Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MT8163 V/B ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 MP2 Grafikkarte mit 520 MHz (Benchmarks) und einen DDR3x32 1600Mbps Speicherkontroller. An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0, Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN, FM und GPS.

Im Vergleich zum schnelleren MediaTek MT8163 V/A taktet die CPU niedriger (1,3 versus 1,5 GHz) und auch die GPU (520 versus 600 MHz).

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

show full text
ModelMediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHzWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
SeriesMediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1300 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 1
Technology28 nm
FeaturesDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 MP2@520MHz, internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (520 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8724     avg: 10042     median: 10290 (9%)     max: 10857 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 716     avg: 831     median: 867 (3%)     max: 875 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 739     avg: 852     median: 870.5 (10%)     max: 893 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 639     median: 640 (6%)     max: 648 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1683     avg: 1754     median: 1767 (2%)     max: 1797 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
601 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1583 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1888     avg: 1930     median: 1930 (3%)     max: 1972 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 617     avg: 638     median: 638 (10%)     max: 659 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11818     avg: 13133     median: 13321.5 (16%)     max: 14321 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2821     avg: 2929     median: 2853.5 (3%)     max: 3320 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 34714     avg: 35625     median: 35464 (12%)     max: 36602 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
4493 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
13368 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
2432 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
20724 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
41017 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2907     avg: 3177     median: 3219.5 (21%)     max: 3361 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4125     avg: 4345     median: 4294 (21%)     max: 4685 Points

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 17:45:23

#0 checking url part for id 8108 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.083s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8108 +0.003s ... 0.086s

#7 got single benchmarks 8108 +0.022s ... 0.108s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.003s ... 0.11s

#9 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.006s ... 0.116s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.172s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.192s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)