Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.9, phase comparison-AF, Videos @2160p/30fps
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 70 Bewertungen (aus 101 Tests)
Testberichte für das Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Ganz wichtig bei Motorolas neuem Oberklasse-Phone Edge 50 Pro: der Style. Ausgefallene Farbvarianten, Pantone-zertifzierte Farben bei Bildschirm und Kamera und viel Personalisierung, damit das Handy auch zu Besitzerin oder Besitzer passt. Aber ist auch das Innenleben des Phones aufsehenerregend?
Quelle: Tech Stage

Das Motorola Edge 50 Pro hebt sich optisch positiv vom Einerlei am Smartphone-Markt ab, ohne dabei die inneren Werte zu vernachlässigen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chip (Print) - 8/24

Die Kamera überzeugt mit hoher Qualität selbst unter schlechten Lichtverhältnissen.
Einzeltest, online nicht verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 01.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 97% Bildschirm: 97% Mobilität: 92%
Quelle: PC Welt

Darüber, ob das Motorola Edge 50 Pro seinen “Pro”-Namenszusatz verdient, kann man streiten. Das Edge 50 Pro ist aber zweifelsohne eines der aktuell ästhetisch ansprechendsten Mittelklasse-Handys auf dem Markt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PCtipp.ch

Motorolas Edge 50 Pro ist ein gutes Smartphone, aber es löst (zumindest bei mir) keine Begeisterung aus. Es kann alles, was ein Oberklassegerät sollte und tut dies ohne zu enttäuschen, aber es bietet nichts Spezielles.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2024
Quelle: Chip.de

Das Motorola Edge 50 Pro zeigt im Test viele überzeugende Qualitäten. Dazu gehört das schöne OLED-Display mit immenser Spitzenhelligkeit und tollen Farben.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Preis: 76% Leistung: 83% Ausstattung: 97% Bildschirm: 97% Mobilität: 92%
Quelle: Go2 Mobile

Der ehemaligen Google-Tochter ist mit dem Motorola Edge 50 Pro eine gesunde Mischung aus Preis und Leistung gelungen. Es gibt nur sehr wenig Kritik an dem 700 Euro preiswerten Smartphone – wenn überhaupt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Leistung: 73% Mobilität: 87% Gehäuse: 89%
Quelle: Computerbild

Mit dem Edge 50 Pro ist Motorola ein gutes Smartphone gelungen. Es schließt gewissermaßen eine Lücke zwischen den sehr teuren Modellen der Oberklasse und den teils schwächelnden Geräten der Mittelklasse. Das Design ist ansprechend und die Wasserdichtigkeit zeitgemäß. Auch das Display und die Kamera überzeugten im Test – nur bei voller Vergrößerung glänzt Letztere nicht. Dafür ist in den niedrigeren Zoomstufen und auch bei den Selfies die Detailtreue gut. Schade ist, dass Motorola dem Pro-Modell im Vergleich zum Vorgänger weniger Leistung beim Prozessor gönnt. Der verbaute Snapdragon ist zwar nicht langsam, aber er sorgt dafür, dass sich das Gerät eher in Richtung Mittel- statt Oberklasse bewegt. Da hilft auch das große Netzteil gepaart mit einem ordentlichen Akku wenig.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 96%
Quelle: Inside Handy

Mit einem Preis von 699 Euro ist das Motorola Edge 50 Pro das günstigste Top-Smartphone auf dem Markt. Doch ohne Top-Prozessor stellt sich hier die Frage, wie sich ein Top-Smartphone überhaupt definiert.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: GSM Choice
EN→DEOverall, although the phone has many advantages, including a good camera, software issues can affect the overall user experience. I hope Motorola will take steps to improve the camera app in future software updates. The overall assessment of this phone is rather positive. Aside from issues with the camera app and video recording, there are no major flaws – except for the price. Motorola originally wanted around €700 for it. At that price, there were many phones on the market that didn't have the aforementioned issues and were more versatile. Currently, this model can be purchased for about half that price, at €350, which is quite a good deal. Overall, the smartphone is decent.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.08.2025
Quelle: Amateur Photographer
EN→DEThe middle child of the Motorola Edge 50 family packs quite a punch for a slightly watered down version of the 50 Ultra. My only complaints are with its low light performance, a lag when it processes images and the curved screen, but the screen problem might not bother everyone and can be fixed with a phone case that can give you more of a grip on it. As someone who regularly uses her phone for creating social content, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is one I’d consider, particularly for shooting portraits and quality video.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Techradar
EN→DEWith a long-lasting and fast-charging battery, a solid processor and a beautiful 6.7-inch curved display, it's hard to find fault with the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The camera steals the show but, at its mid-range price, it’s worthy of consideration for anyone who doesn’t want to pay flagship prices for top-tier handset.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tom's Guide
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro has some great features that help it to stand out, especially its fantastic battery life, vibrant screen colors and AI features. But the camera's lack of stability and overall poor performance hold it back. A limited number of supported Android updates makes it feels like less of a value.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Irish Mirror
EN→DEOverall, Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a decent value for money proposition at a competitive price point. It’s the fastest charging 2024 phone that I’ve seen on the market so far and the 125W charger is in the box. It’s not a phone aimed at those who want superfast performance – try the Edge 50 Ultra if that’s your priority. But if you want a capable all-rounder in a stylish package, then Edge 50 Pro is well worth considering.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.07.2024
Quelle: GSM Arena

The new Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and the Motorola Edge 50 Pro may look quite identical at first glance but there are a number of differences between how these devices perform.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.07.2024
Quelle: Expert Reviews
EN→DEThere’s a very specific cohort for whom the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is perfect: anyone after a cheap telephoto camera phone will find this to be one of the most affordable options around. Along with that, you’re getting an excellent display, nippy fast charging and plenty of storage space. If you aren’t fussed about telephoto shooters, however, I can’t recommend you buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The rest of the camera suite has some wobbles and the performance sacrifices are simply too steep considering the price being asked. Most people will be better off picking up a Google Pixel 8a, instead – the charging speeds and internal storage aren’t as good, but the display is equally fantastic and performance, battery life, software support and general camera quality are all superior.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Guru Daily
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is an attractive phone with an impressive list of features and abilities to provides a satisfying mobile experience, an excellent camera and amazingly fast recharging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is an impressive mid-range specimen that looks to break free of the commonplace look of similarly priced alternatives, offering a lightweight design in attractive finishes and colour options to suit most tastes. It’s more than just a looker, however; the 144Hz 1.5K OLED screen is fast and detailed, ideal for both gaming and doom-scrolling on TikTok, it goes from flat to full in just 20 minutes with 125W charging (and a charger in the box no less), plus its near-stock approach to Android 14 is a refreshing change too. The camera setup is another highlight; despite using the same main camera as last year’s Edge 40, it remains an impressive arrangement for the price point with a wide f/1.4 aperture that gives close-ups a natural bokeh, and the inclusion of a 3x telephoto camera at the £599 price point is a rarity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Amateur Photographer
EN→DEThe middle child of the Motorola Edge 50 family packs quite a punch for being a slightly watered down version of the 50 Ultra. My only complaints are with its low light performance, a lag when it processes images and the curved screen, but the screen problem might not bother everyone and can be fixed with a phone case that can give you more of a grip on it. As someone who regularly uses her phone for creating social content, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is one I’d consider, particularly for shooting portraits and quality video.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Root Nation
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a great phone at a reasonable price, offering much more than some of its competitors. I believe it’s perhaps one of the best smartphones in its price range. You get an excellent display, a vibrant design, wireless charging, IP68-rated protection, and a very good camera. The Edge 50 Pro is also one of the most aesthetically pleasing phones in its class on the market, and its software and charging capabilities are among the best. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a great addition to the modern phone market, offering excellent performance and connectivity features, as well as high-end capabilities at a moderate price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 97% Preis: 100% Leistung: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Mezha EN
EN→DEAmong a large number of similar smartphones, it's always nice to find something with an original design, even if it's just a more interesting back cover. And when the device is also generally capable of providing good performance, it will give competitors a headache. Actually, this can be said about the motorola edge 50 pro - it's a good smartphone. Yes, it has some flaws, such as plastic on the body, controversial issues with cameras, or the lack of Always-On Display. But its price is less than half of the market leaders. Therefore, if you are looking for a good smartphone with a non-standard appearance, this is a good option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Tech Advisor
EN→DEWhether it deserves the Pro designation or not (it probably doesn’t), the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is one of the most aesthetically pleasing mid-range phones on the market, while its display, software, and charging provisions are among the best. You can get better cameras, performance, and battery life for the money if those are important to you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phone Arena
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a great phone and, given the user experience and specs, what you get matches well to the €699 price tag. This is about what you can expect from a high-tier mid-range phone in 2024. The only major issue we have with the Edge 50 Pro is that it comes with only 3 years of Android updates. Most phone manufacturers now offer at least 4 years, which is what the Galaxy S23 FE from Samsung comes with. Speaking of the Galaxy S23 FE, it is probably the best competition to the Edge 50 Pro, with a chipset that is even more capable (despite being two generations old by now), also rocking a triple camera system at the back, and the ability to shoot at 4K 60fps. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 inside the Motorola, however, prevails in many gaming-related cases. Also, there’s the 125W wired and 50W wireless charging with the Edge 50 Pro vs the 25/15W on the Galaxy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%
Quelle: GSM Arena

The Pro isn't the top model in the Motorola Edge lineup this time around, but it nicely slots in below flagship territory. It offers a very capable camera setup for stills with a main camera that's a champion at light gathering, a 3x zoom camera in a segment where dedicated zoom cameras are rare and an ultrawide that's got autofocus and puts it to good use. And then it tops it all off with some excellent selfies for good measure. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2024
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEWith a nice design that’s well thought out, attractive colours and a good range of mid-range specs, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro could be a good pick for those who want an Android phone that looks a little different to everything else. Check out the Best Android Phone page for more options.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEThe Pro isn't the top model in the Motorola Edge lineup this time around, but it nicely slots somewhere below flagship territory. Even with the remarkably-specced Ultra, the Edge 50 Pro still manages to offer a very capable camera setup for stills - a champion at light gathering of a main camera is joined by a solid telephoto in a segment where dedicated zoom cameras are rare and an ultrawide that's got autofocus and puts it to good use. And then it tops it all off with some excellent selfies for good measure. Motorola says it's big on experiences and transcending the specs wars, which is convenient when the chipset isn't winning any. But the newly renamed Hello UI is a sizable chunk of the experience with an Edge 50 Pro and it's a nice blend of the visual simplicity of 'stock' Android and the personality and functionality that Motorola has built and continued to develop on top of it. All things considered, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro may just be worth a recommendation - with a medium-sized asterisk about regional pricing and market context.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Stuff TV
EN→DEI’m a fan of the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s sleek styling, eye-catching colour options, and how quickly it can gulp down power when plugged into a mains socket. But I don’t think it’s the flagship-baiter that the previous generation could claim to be. That’s not to say it’s lacking performance, or has particularly meagre battery life – more that rivals have superior silicon and larger capacity cells for the same sort of cash. The Pantone partnership hasn’t delivered cameras that significantly outsnap the competition, either. Image quality is decent rather than spectacular, and the app is particularly sluggish. Phone photographers only need to spend a little more to get a better shooting experience. If you’re sold on the looks, there’s nothing here I’d consider a dealbreaker – though the abundance of well-rounded rivals at the £599/€699 mark means it doesn’t quite earn that Pro moniker. I fully expect it’ll prove more successful in other territories, where pricing is much keener.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Spurt

Reviewing the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, a fresh 2024 Moto flagship sporting a triple lens camera with Pantone colour correction, slick leathery design and Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 smarts. But can the Motorola Edge 50 Pro compete with the best smartphones like the Nothing Phone 2 around this £599 price? And should you consider the Edge 50 Ultra instead? Well, the performance is sadly limited compared with some close rivals. Gaming on Genshin Impact is a smooth enough experience, but I saw some lag using the cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a great phone that's competitively priced. However, in some areas, you may be better off purchasing other phones. For example, if you want better performance, you could opt for the Oppo Reno 11 Pro (Review). However, it lacks an IP rating and wireless charging and offers similar camera performance. Then there's the Vivo V30, which offers slightly better camera performance and the same chipset. However, it lacks wireless charging and a few other features. Motorola Edge 50 Pro offers a lot more features than some of its competitors. I honestly think that this is probably one of the best smartphones in the price segment. The cameras aren't amazing, but they're not bad, and you get usable sensors. The display is excellent, you get a standout design, wireless charging, an IP68 rating, and a lot more. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is on the edge of greatness and is definitely one of the best mid-range phones you can buy today.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Business Standard
EN→DEPriced at Rs 35,999 for the top-end model, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is as a well-rounded smartphone catering to diverse user preferences. Its standout features, including the 144Hz refresh rate display, AI-enhanced camera system, rapid wired and wireless charging, and top-tier protection against water and dust, provide a competitive edge over its counterparts. However, the device is not without flaws, notably in its imaging capabilities. Nevertheless, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro presents a comprehensive package, prioritising overall user experience over individual features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.04.2024
Quelle: The Times of India
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro boosts a crisp curved display with a great viewing experience. The performance of the device also provides a great experience, making it a competitive smartphone in the mid-range segment. However, Motorola may have worked on the colour processing of the images, which could have been the star of the device as portrayed in the launch event. Overall, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a great option for people who are looking for a great-performing smartphone under the range of Rs.35000.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express
EN→DEThe Edge 50 Pro may not be a flagship, but it feels close to a premium smartphone. I feel this phone combines AI, a powerful processor, and speedy RAM to deliver a great mobile device under Rs 35,000. Yes, its AI-enhanced cameras are also respectable but don’t come close to the iPhone 15 and Pixel 8. I would like to see more Gen AI features on the Edge 50 Pro in the future via a software update. That would make the Edge 50 Pro a lot more interesting device than what it is today. Maybe phone companies need the magic of AI to differentiate their devices from others.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Think Digit
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a nearly perfect mid-range smartphone. For the features on offer such as IP68 dust and water resistance, 50 W wireless charging, and a 144 Hz pOLED display, it has been priced competitively starting at merely ₹31,999. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has one of the most gorgeous designs on the market in its price segment – the colour-matched aluminium frame, the soft vegan back, and the delightful colour choices make it a treat for the eyes. You also get a colour-accurate display, decent performance, and super fast 125 W charging speeds. However, the camera experience is a chink in its armour. The camera array, while impressive, hasn’t been tuned exceptionally well leading to some issues with skin tones and general colour reproduction. The Motorola ‘Edge’ series of smartphones is something special.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 56% Gehäuse: 84%
Quelle: 91mobiles
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro is poised to be the smartphone to beat in the sub-Rs 35,000 segment as of now. The handset makes a compelling case for itself with its premium and flagship-grade specifications, such as a reliable telephoto camera and 50W wireless charging, typically found on smartphones priced a notch higher. The overall day-to-day performance of the device remains on par with its competitors. However, the Motorola smartphone surpasses its closest rivals, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (review) and Vivo V30 (review), with its vibrant 144Hz refresh rate display, 125W fast charging speeds, clean software experience, and striking IP68-certified design. Overall, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro with its competitive pricing remains a strong contender within the segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Android Authority
EN→DEIn my limited time with the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it’s been hard not to be impressed by the hardware. It looks good, performs well, and includes a range of features you can’t find in alternatives. What’s not to like? It isn’t perfect, though, as the promised software upgrade support comes across as lackluster at just three major upgrades. It’s also a bit pricey, starting at Rs 31,999 (~$383), and going up to Rs 35,999 (~$431). In the US, it may not compete well with the likes of the upcoming Pixel 8a.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2024
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets
EN→DEThe Motorola Edge 50 Pro comes with a 4,500mAh battery, and the 12GB RAM variant, which we're reviewing, gets a 125W TurboCharger in the box. The 8GB RAM variant will get a slower 68W charger. The phone charges super fast with the 125W charger, and you also get 50W wireless charging support. At a starting price of Rs. 31,999, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro seems like an easy recommendation. However, we suggest waiting for our full review to decide whether to go for the new Edge 50 Pro or choose one of its alternatives, such as the recently launched Nothing Phone 2a (Review).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: MuyComputer
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 13.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Xataka
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Hipertextual
ES→DEPositive: Impressive design; great display; useful cameras. Negative: High price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.05.2024
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70%
Quelle: Canaltech
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 96% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Target HD
PT→DENegative: Slow memory; short battery life; curved display; no memory card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.05.2024
Quelle: Target HD
PT→DEPositive: Powerful processor; nice cameras; great display; good connectivity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Multiplayer IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Batista70Phone
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Ausstattung: 95% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Wired IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Evo smart
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 60% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Mister Gadget
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 79% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 87%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 95% Ergonomie: 95%
Quelle: HDblog.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Ausstattung: 84%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 95% Ergonomie: 95%
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 95%
Quelle: Techprincess IT
IT→DEPositive: Beautiful design; great display; high performance; quick charging. Negative: Poor cameras; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.04.2024
Quelle: Corriere
IT→DEPositive: Light weight; compact size; pleasant design; very fast 125W charging. Negative: Weak hardware; poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→DEPositive: Elegant design; powerful hardware; very quick charging; nice cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 60%
Quelle: 01Net
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Presse Citron
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 95%
Quelle: Charles Tech
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 92% Preis: 100% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Les Mobiles
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: CNet France
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Journal du Geek
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Clubic
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Les Numeriques
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100% Ergonomie: 100%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEPositive: Simple design; solid workmanship; 512GB ROM; good autonomy; quick charging speed; waterproof IP68; good price. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.04.2024
Quelle: GSM Maniak
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.08.2025
Quelle: Video testy
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.09.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobileworld 24
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Telepolis
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Geex X-kom
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: T3 PL
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Tabletowo
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Techno Strefa
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: m GSM
PL→DEPositive: High performance; very quick charging; decent battery life; stereo speakers; good connectivity; beautiful display. Negative: High price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2025
Quelle: Komorkomania
PL→DEPositive: Beautiful OLED display; great triple cameras; 12GB RAM; fast 125W charging; powerful processor; waterproof IP68; good speakers; NFC module; support 5G; rich starter kit. Negative: No memory card slot; no headphone jack; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.07.2024
Quelle: Orange PL
PL→DEPositive: Attractive design; waterproof IP68; stereo speakers; 512GB ROM; very quick 125W charging; excellent cameras. Negative: Weak processor; hybrid slot; short battery life; no Always On Display mode.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.06.2024
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEPositive: Excellent display; great speakers; nice cameras; beautiful design; decent performance. Negative: High price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Quelle: GSM Online
PL→DEPositive: Nice display; quick charging; great built quality; good cameras. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.05.2024
Quelle: Instalki
PL→DEPositive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; waterproof IP68; excellent display; very quick charging; rich set of package; large RAM and ROM; stereo speakers. Negative: UFS 2.2 memory; short battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.05.2024
Quelle: Techno Senior
PL→DEPositive: 12GB RAM; 512GB ROM; nice display; quick charging; support eSIM.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.05.2024
Quelle: Gry.wm.pl
PL→DEPositive: Excellent design; beautiful display; compact size; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.04.2024
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; great cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.04.2024
Quelle: Telepolis
PL→DEPositive: Affordable price; elegant design; large ROM; nice cameras; quick charging. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Premium design; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof IP68; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.04.2024
Quelle: ITC UA
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: MobilArena HU
HU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 18.04.2024
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz
CZ→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Ausstattung: 82% Mobilität: 87% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Laptopmedia CN
zh-CN→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 97% Preis: 100% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 100% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Tek.no
NO→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Komputer for alle
DA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 19.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Komputer for alle
DA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: Mere Mobil.dk
DA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla
SV→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Mobil.se
SV→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Bildschirm: 70%
Quelle: Mobile-com JP
JA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.11.2024
Bewertung: Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Computerblog.ro
→DEPositive: Slim size; light weight; attractive design; decent cameras; fast charging. Negative: Short battery life; poor display; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.05.2024
Quelle: Arena IT
→DEPositive: Beautiful display; decent hardware; nice performance; good cameras; decent autonomy; quick charging; great connectivity; solid workmanship; impressive speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.04.2024
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 720: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SoC.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 7 Gen 3: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo Kernen (1x ARM Cortex-A715 2,63 GHz Prime Core, 3x ARM Cortex A715 2,4 GHz Performance-Cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A510 mit 1,8 Effizienz-Cluster) und einem X63 5G Modem. Der Chip wird im modernen 4nm Prozess gefertigt.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .