NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

Professionelle auf CAD optimierte Grafikkarte für Notebooks von NVidia basierend auf 7900 GTX. Wurde von der 3500M bzw 3600M abgelöst.

Durch spezielle professionelle Treiber zeigt sie eine sehr gute Anwendungsleistung (3D Renderer, CAD), jedoch eine schlechtere Spieleleistung. Mit gemoddeten Treibern sollte sie sich jedoch wie eine 7900 GTX verhalten.

Die Treiber der Quadro FX Serie sind zertifiziert für CAD Anwendungen (z.B. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) und DCC Anwendungen (z.B. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) und bieten eine 12-Bit-Präzision für Subpixel, Vollbild-Antialiasing, Hardwarebeschleunigtes Antialiasing für Punkte und Linien und weitere für CAD und DCC optimierte Einstellungen.

Links zu gemoddeten Treibern finden Sie hier.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove

Die Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M ist eine mobile Grafikkarte für Workstation-Laptops. Sie basiert auf die selbe Architektur wie die GeForce 9800M GTX jedoch bietet sie die vollen 128 Shaderprozessoren des G92 Chips (9800M GTX nur 112). Daher ist sie vergleichbar zur GTX 280M, jedoch wird sie noch in 65nm gefertigt und geringer getaktet.

Zur Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung war sie die schnellste Quadro Karte für Notebooks. An 1. Dezember 2009 wurde sie jedoch von der Quadro FX 3800M abgelöst (ebenfalls 128 Shader Cores, jedoch bereits in 55nm gerfertigt und daher mit höheren Taktraten).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M (compare) 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M (compare) 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M (compare) 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M (compare) 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M (compare) 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M (compare) 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M (compare) 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M (compare) 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M (compare) 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M (compare) 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M (compare) 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M (compare) 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M (compare) 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M (compare) 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M (compare) 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M (compare) 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M (compare) 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M (compare) 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M (compare) 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M (compare) 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M (compare) 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M (compare) 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M (compare) 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M (compare) 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71glmNB9E-GLM3
ArchitectureG7xG9x
24 / 8 128 -
Core500 MHz550 MHz
Memory600 MHz800 MHz
Bus256 Bit256 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory512 MB1024 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 9c, 3.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors278 Million754 Million
Technology90 nm65 nm
Featuresoptimiert für professionelle 3D Anwendungen und CAD ProgrammeOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Size
Introduced29.09.2005 14.08.2008
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader1375 MHz

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
27600 Points (29%)
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 18100     avg: 18341.5     median: 18341 (10%)     max: 18583 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 8400     avg: 8450     median: 8450 (16%)     max: 8500 Points
15759 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
25.5 fps (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
32 fps (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
34.6 fps (74%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
29.8 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
54.6 fps (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
22 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
26.4 fps (55%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 116%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Quadro FX 3700M:
»
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps
Quadro FX 3700M:
»

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 18.09.2017)