Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate etwas begrenzt.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

► remove from comparison Intel T9550

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 Dual-Core CPU ist ein oberer Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9550 ist vergleichbar mit dem teureren P9600, welcher jedoch auf einen TDP von 25 Watt spezifiziert ist (T9550 max. 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der 2.66 GHz und des großen Level 2 Cache von 6 MB (shared für alle beiden Kerne), ist die Anwendungsleistung für Single-Threaded Anwendungen und Spiele welche hauptsächlich einen Kern benutzen, sehr gut. Moderne Spiele, welche mehrere Threads benutzen, können jedoch von einem 4-Kerner deutlich mehr profitieren (z.B. ein Drittel mehr Leistung bei DIRT 2 beim Einsatz von 4 Kernen, siehe unseren Prozessorleistung und Spiele Artikel). In 2009 reichte die Performance des T9550 jedoch für eine flüssige Darstellung von allen Spielen (GTA4 ev. knapp) und auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen kommen mit der Leistung gut aus.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Im Core 2 Duo T9550 wurden keine Features der Penryn Architektur deaktiviert. Daher unterstützt er 64 Bit, Virtualisierung und alle Stromsparfunktionen (z.B. C6 State).

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9550 passt in den Socket P (BGA479, PGA478).

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

► remove from comparison Intel T9800

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 ist ein schneller high-end Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Zur Zeit der Einführung war er der schnellste Core 2 Duo für Notebooks, später wurde er jedoch vom T9900 abgelöst (mit 3.06 GHz).

Dank der hohen Taktung von 2.93 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle und die schnelleren Dual Core CPUs mit 3 GHz (T9900), den T9800 abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9800 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9550Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2660 MHz2920 MHz
FSB80010661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm0.775-1.1V45 nm1.05-1.212V45 nm1-1.25 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTVirtualization, Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep (up to C6), ExBit, SSE4.1Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$289 U.S.$316 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9550Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 2911     avg: 2958     median: 2966 (26%)     max: 3001 Points
122%
1 T9800 +
3633 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 5418     avg: 5530     median: 5577 (8%)     max: 5615 Points
123%
1 T9800 +
6839 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9550 +
922 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9550 +
29 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 2347     avg: 2384     median: 2385 (5%)     max: 2417 Points
110%
1 T9800 +
2626 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 16     avg: 17     median: 17 (4%)     max: 17.91 s
100%
1 T9800 +
15 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 40     avg: 41.6     median: 42 (2%)     max: 42.84 s
100%
1 T9800 +
38 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 1059     avg: 1105     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1132 s
101%
1 T9800 +
1008 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 6820     avg: 17433     median: 20774 (10%)     max: 24706 MIPS
130%
1 T9800 +
26991 MIPS (13%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 5870     avg: 14981     median: 19516 (15%)     max: 19556 MFLOPS
104%
1 T9800 +
20305 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 6414     avg: 6553     median: 6619 (42%)     max: 6625 Points
100%
1 T9800 +
6618 Points (42%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 3.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (79%)     max: 5.5 Points
104%
1 T9800 +
5.7 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9550 +
min: 5252     avg: 5399     median: 5424 (6%)     max: 5496 Points
107%
1 T9800 +
5802 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 17. 16:15:27

#0 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 448 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.012s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0s ... 0.013s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#85 got single benchmarks 473 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0s ... 0.02s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#88 got single benchmarks 449 +0.02s ... 0.041s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 448 +0.001s ... 0.042s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#91 got single benchmarks 448 +0.009s ... 0.051s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.059s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.062s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.062s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#145 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.064s

#146 return log +0s ... 0.064s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)