, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core Duo T2700 vs Intel Core Duo T2500

Intel Core Duo T2700

Der Intel Core Duo T2700 war 2006 das Topmodell der mobilen Notebookprozessoren. Er besitzt zwei Rechenkerne (basierend auf den Pentium M) und bietet noch keine Unterstütztung für 64 Bit Betriebssysteme (nur 32 Bit). Er unterstützt jedoch bereits VT-x Virtualisierung. In 2010 zählt die Rechenleistung nur noch zur Einsteigerklasse (Performance eines 2 GHz Core 2 Duo P7370 z.B.).

Intel Core Duo T2500

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core Duo T2700Intel Core Duo T2500
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
CodenameYonahYonah
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
» Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2600 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2450 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2400 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo L2500 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2350 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2250 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2300 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2300E compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo L2400 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo L2300 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2050 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo U2500 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo U2400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2600 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2450 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2400 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo L2500 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2350 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2250 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2300 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2300E compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo L2400 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo L2300 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo T2050 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo U2500 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core Duo U2400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2
Clock2330 MHz2000 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP31 Watt31 Watt
Transistors151 Million
Technology65 nm1.1625V - 1.30V65 nm
Die Size90 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
Architecturex86x86
$663 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core Duo T2700

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1860 Points (4%)
min: 1593     avg: 1618     median: 1621 (3%)     max: 1639 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
230 Points (88%)
min: 155     avg: 191     median: 200 (77%)     max: 217 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T2700 +
25 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T2500 +
min: 73     avg: 75.5     median: 75.5 (3%)     max: 78 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T2500 +
1761 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T2500 +
13519 MIPS (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T2500 +
9983 MFLOPS (8%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T2500 +
545 Points (37%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T2500 +
1719 Points (71%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T2500 +
1551 Points (70%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
6493 Points (87%)
min: 4992     avg: 5368     median: 5202 (70%)     max: 6075 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4390 Points (28%)
min: 2859     avg: 3655     median: 3662.5 (23%)     max: 4450 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2700 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2500 → 84% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 19. 12:42:39

#0 checking url part for id 165 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 170 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#34 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#35 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 165 +0s ... 0.003s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#38 got single benchmarks 165 +0.008s ... 0.012s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 170 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.013s

#41 got single benchmarks 170 +0.021s ... 0.035s

#42 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.036s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#65 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.04s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#67 return log +0.004s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)