Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6500, bietet der T6570 jedoch Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6570Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2100 MHz2800 MHz3060 MHz
FSB80010661066
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.2125 V45 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T6570Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
$316 U.S.$530 U.S.
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T6570 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (20%)     max: 2314 Points
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (6%)     max: 4284 Points
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
4768 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
2462 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1170 s (14%)
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
799 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
36.8 s (7%)
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
25.1 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
2787 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
15.3 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 57.9     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
37.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
972 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
25083 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (29%)     max: 5134 Points
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
8922 Points (56%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
5.6 Points (80%)
5.7 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6570 +
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (4%)     max: 4040 Points
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points
6045 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 123% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 132% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 11. 11:11:46

#0 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.01s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0s ... 0.011s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#85 got single benchmarks 466 +0.014s ... 0.026s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.026s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#88 got single benchmarks 397 +0.01s ... 0.036s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.036s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#91 got single benchmarks 475 +0.007s ... 0.044s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.044s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.045s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#178 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#184 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#186 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#187 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#189 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.056s

#190 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)