Realme 14 Pro+
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 21mm, Videos @2160p/30fps
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 36 Bewertungen (aus 71 Tests)
Testberichte für das Realme 14 Pro+
Wer ein Mittelklassephone mit viel Akkukapazität, guten Kameras und hellem OLED-Screen sucht, ist beim Realme 14 Pro Plus 5G gut aufgehoben: 6.000-Milliamperestunden-Batterie und Periskop-Zoomlinse sind die Highlights des Handys. Ob das Realme-Phone insgesamt überzeugen kann, das erfahren Sie im Test.
Quelle: Go2 Mobile

Das Realme 14 Pro+ ist „nur“ ein Mittelklasse-Smartphone, dessen Preispolitik ein wenig verwirrend scheint. Realme wirbt zum Verkaufsstart mit einem Rabatt von 100 Euro.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 86% Leistung: 75% Mobilität: 98% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Smartzone

In unserem Test des Realme 14 Pro+ waren wir an vielen Stellen sehr kritisch, da das Smartphone kaum Fortschritte gegenüber seinem Vorgänger mitbringt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 85%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Cashify
EN→DESo, overall, the Realme 14 Pro Plus long-term review is outstanding. It stands out as a well-rounded mid-range smartphone that excels in design, display, and battery life. Despite housing a substantial 6,000mAh battery, its lightweight build makes it comfortable for daily use. The 6.83-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth visuals, and the peak brightness of 1,500 nits allows for clear visibility even under direct sunlight. Performance-wise, the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset handles everyday tasks and moderate gaming efficiently. The inclusion of UFS 3.1 storage contributes to faster data access and app loading times. However, the device is limited to two years of major Android updates, which might be a consideration for long-term users.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.05.2025
Quelle: Yugatech
EN→DEAs of writing this review, the realme 14 Pro+ 5G has a suggested retail price of PHP 27,999 with a configuration of 12GB RAM and 512GB internal storage. The realme 14 Pro+ 5G can also be purchased for as low as PHP 25,363 via TikTok. This comes with a free realme Watch S2 with a steel wristband (worth PHP 4,499) until March 27, 2025, or until supplies last. It’s a bit of a stretch to ask for this much considering the hardware configuration of the 14 Pro+, but it also tries to make up for other factors such as the camera and battery. Wrapping this up, my experience with the realme 14 Pro+ was quite impressive. It was able to handle my day-to-day tasks and live up to its promises, especially in gaming. Not to mention, I genuinely enjoyed how great and capable the phone’s camera is. So, if you’re looking for a mid-range phone with premium looks and solid camera performance, the realme 14 Pro+ 5G can be your match.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.04.2025
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets
EN→DEAt a starting price of Rs. 29,999, the Realme 14 Pro+ offers plenty of features. It impresses with its sleek design, immersive display (despite lacking HDR or Dolby Vision), solid all-around camera performance—especially with zoom—long battery life, and an IP69 rating for durability. Overall, it's a well-rounded package, though an upgrade may not be necessary if you already own the Realme 13 Pro+. The phone competes with other offerings in the price range, such as the Redmi Note 14 Pro+, the new Nothing Phone 3a, and the Poco X7 Pro. The Redmi and Nothing phones offer the same chipset. However, the former has Dolby Vision support and faster charging. Meanwhile, the Nothing Phone 3a provides a distinctive design, cleaner software, and slightly superior main camera performance. The Poco X7 Pro, though not the best in camera quality, delivers flagship-level performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Manila Shaker
EN→DEFinally, let’s talk about pricing. The realme 14 Pro+ 5G is priced at PHP27,999, In my experience, it is a reliable device, especially in the camera department, it delivers quality performance. Beyond that, it also features a large battery, ensuring extended usage, a definite plus for users on the go. In terms of design, it stands out with an eye-catching and aesthetically pleasing look. Its lightweight build makes it easy to carry, adding to the overall convenience. One of the standout features is the underwater mode, perfect for those who love beach trips and summer vacations. If you’re looking for a smartphone that can accompany you on your upcoming summer getaway, this might just be the ideal choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.03.2025
Quelle: Manila Shaker

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2025
Quelle: Yugatech

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.03.2025
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEI have thoroughly enjoyed my time with the Realme 14 Pro Plus. As a reviewer, moving into a budget-focused phone from a flagship can often be a frustrating experience, but that wasn’t the case here. The 14 Pro Plus is really well rounded, and frankly, a bit of a bargain. The software looks good and performs well, the battery lasts an age, the screen is lovely and the cameras outperform most similarly-priced rivals. It’s not the best option for die-hard gamers, but unless you’re playing very graphically demanding titles, the power here is likely sufficient. Of course, there are plenty of solid competitors to consider too. The recently launched (and similarly named) Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus is the first that springs to mind.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News
EN→DEThe difference between the Realme 14 Pro and Realme 14 Pro Plus is that the latter has a slightly larger display, way better camera experience, and faster charging. The only decent alternatives to these two phones are Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro and 14 Pro+. They have specs similar to the Realme 14 Pro and 14 Pro Plus but at similar prices. The final decision is up to you, so it is better to choose a smartphone based on your needs and requirements.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.02.2025
Quelle: GSM Arena

The Realme 14 Pro+ is a well-rounded midranger with a large screen, a large battery, capable camera kit and some unique design traits. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.02.2025
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEThe Realme 14 Pro+ is a niche offering right now because of its limited availability. The maker was once a real challenger to the Redmi series, but now that only holds true for the Indian market. The 14 Pro+ is a well-rounded device with a bright OLED screen, good performance, versatile and reliable camera experience day and night. Realme UI is familiar, and the user experience is always smooth. The phone is not ideal, though. Its battery life is not up to par, its speakers' sound quality is mediocre, and the camera video quality is average at best. Still, we think that the Relame 14 Pro+ is a good alternative to the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ for its many cameras and solid execution, so we recommend exploring it if you are looking for a phone priced around €400. And if you live in India, you should definitely put it on your shortlists.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express
EN→DEOver the past decade, smartphone design has plateaued, with manufacturers reluctant to innovate, adhering to the popular mantra, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” This has resulted in a stagnation of design, making most smartphones look similar, with only a few standing out. When Realme asked me to review its latest premium smartphone, the Realme 14 Pro Plus, I immediately noticed the company’s attempt to break the mould with a distinctive design that commands attention.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: 91mobiles
EN→DEThis concludes our Realme 14 Pro+ review. While the smartphone offers noteworthy improvements in key areas over its predecessor, there are things it could have done better. The display’s peak brightness lags behind competitors, and the colour-changing back panel, while innovative, may degrade with prolonged sunlight exposure, especially in a region like India. The camera performance, although impressive in many aspects, still requires optimisation for processing speed and colour accuracy. Additionally, Realme’s limited software update policy puts it at a disadvantage for long-term use, especially when rival brands offer more extended support. However, for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with reliable performance, good battery life, and a modern design, the Realme 14 Pro+ delivers a strong value proposition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Tech2.in.com
EN→DEThe Realme 14 Pro+ stands out as an excellent choice if you’re looking for dependable cameras without breaking the bank. It doesn’t stop at just photography, though. With a stunning display and impressive speakers, it’s designed for an immersive multimedia experience. Add to that its long-lasting battery, which can keep up with extended gaming sessions, and you’ve got a phone that’s built to entertain. To top it off, the Pro+ comes in a sleek yet durable design, making it a package that’s as attractive as it is practical. The Realme 14 Pro, on the other hand, caters to those who value looks, display quality, battery life, and dependable everyday performance. Its primary camera punches well above its weight for this segment, but the lack of an ultra-wide camera is a noticeable omission that might frustrate some users.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Tech PP
EN→DERealme 14 Pro Plus comes in three variants: the base model starts with 8GB and 128GB starting at rupees 29,999/-, and the 8GB+256GB starting at 31,999/-. The higher variant, 12GB with 512GB of internal storage, starts at 34,999/-. There are also some decent card discounts for a limited time, and you can get up to 5,000 if you purchase the Realme 14 Pro Plus. If you are looking for the best camera smartphone with all-around performance under 30000, Realme 14 Pro Plus might be the best choice. It takes excellent pictures and has all the solid features required for a daily drive. The competitors of Realme 14 Pro Plus will be its own Realme GT6 and also the recently launched Redmi Note 14 Pro series, the OnePlus Nord 4, and the Moto 50 Pro. Here is the decision matrix to help you make the right choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEI have thoroughly enjoyed my time with the Realme 14 Pro Plus. As a reviewer, moving into a budget-focused phone from a flagship can often be a frustrating experience, but that wasn’t the case here. The 14 Pro Plus is really well rounded, and frankly, a bit of a bargain. The software looks good and performs well, the battery lasts an age, the screen is lovely and the cameras outperform most similarly-priced rivals. It’s not the best option for die-hard gamers, but unless you’re playing very graphically demanding titles, the power here is likely sufficient. Of course, there are plenty of solid competitors to consider too. The recently launched (and similarly named) Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus is the first that springs to mind. It charges faster and has a larger and higher resolution main sensor, but it also comes with a much smaller battery and no telephoto lens.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.01.2025
Quelle: Cashify
EN→DEThe Realme 14 Pro Plus has a unique colour-changing design and a capable triple camera setup on the back. It also has a massive battery and a unique colour-changing design on the back. You will still need to deal with the presence of bloatware, lack of NFC and only two years of OS updates. You can also consider other options like the Vivo V40, Motorola Moto Edge 50 Pro, Realme GT 6T and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G. All these phones either offer better performance or superior cameras in the same segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.01.2025
Quelle: Yanko Design
EN→DEThe realme 14 Pro+ is a standout in the mid-range smartphone segment, delivering a blend of innovative design, robust performance, and sustainability. Its collaboration with Valeur Designers has resulted in a device that not only looks and feels premium but also offers a unique, dynamic aesthetic with its color-changing back panel. This feature, alongside the ergonomic quad-curved design, makes it a joy to handle and a conversation starter. Priced competitively at around $325 USD, the device offers exceptional value, blending high-end features typically reserved for more expensive models. It is an excellent choice for those seeking a stylish, high-performance device that aligns with modern sustainability values without breaking the bank.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.01.2025
Bewertung: Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: India Today
EN→DEThe Realme 14 Pro+ is priced at Rs 29,999 for the 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. At this price tag, the phone comes with a few high-end features. It sports a quad-curve display, a 50-megapixel rear camera, a 6,000mAh battery and a Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip. Don’t forget the colour-changing rear panel. After a long time, I have tested a phone that feels equally good on paper and in real life. The Realme 14 Pro+ is definitely worth considering.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobygyaan
EN→DEThe realme 14 Pro+ 5G stands out with its color-changing design, dual OIS camera system with periscope telephoto lens for zoomed shots paired with AI feature for clarity and details. Additionally, the performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is top-notch ensuring a smooth experience for gaming and multitasking. The titan-sized 6,000 mAh battery offers reliable endurance, and Android 15-based realme UI 6.0 offers a customizable interface with added AI features. The realme 14 Pro+ 5G delivers an impressive combination of design innovation, fast performance, and feature-packed cameras that solidifies its position in the upper mid-range smartphone segment. The realme 14 Pro+ 5G is a well-rounded package for its price, with a powerful processor, stunning 1.5K AMOLED display, dual OIS versatile cameras, and a long-lasting battery. Combined with a sleek and IP68 + IP69 durable design, and 80W fast charging, it is an excellent choice in the upper mid-range category.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.01.2025
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEVergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Hipertextual
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Xataka
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 83% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 40% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Evo smart
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 86% Mobilität: 68% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Wired IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 05.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: HDblog.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 87%
Quelle: Cellulare Magazine
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Batista70Phone
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: DDay IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 60% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Multiplayer IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Mister Gadget
IT→DEPositive: Large battery capacity; premium design; great main camera. Negative: Weak processor; inflexible AI Features; average video quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.03.2025
Quelle: Igizmo
IT→DEPositive: Affordable price; great cameras; beautiful AMOLED display; powerful hardware; good cooling system; large battery capacity; waterproof IP69 and dust avoiding. Negative: No charger included; relatively heavy; average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.03.2025
Quelle: Ceotech
IT→DEPositive: Good price; elegant design; waterproof IP68/IP69; tough device; nice display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; quick 80W charging; support eSIM. Negative: Plastic case; slippery case; poor ultra wide angle camera; mediocre video recording.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→DEPositive: Impressive design; tough device; great OLED display; decent performance; very large battery capacity. Negative: Plastic case; no charger included; mediocre ultra wide angle camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→DEPositive: Premium design; tough device; waterproof IP68/IP69; beautiful display; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity; nice cameras. Negative: Plastic case; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Les Numeriques
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Les Mobiles
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: 01Net
FR→DEPositive: Premium design; waterproof IP69; nice cameras; long battery life. Negative: Plastic case; many bloatwares; mediocre audio; no microSD card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2025
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEPositive: Stylish design; good built quality; excellent battery life; decent telephoto lens; great display. Negative: Many bloatwares; average selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.03.2025
Quelle: CNet France
FR→DEPositive: High performance; powerful hardware; waterproof IP69; large battery capacity; quick 80W charging; great cameras; affordable price. Negative: Many bloatwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.03.2025
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Telepolis
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEPositive: Modern design; good built quality; smooth performance; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2025
Quelle: Instalki
PL→DEPositive: Modern design; bright OLED display; long battery life; quick charging; waterproof IP68/IP69; tough device; eSIM support. Negative: Mono speakers; poor video recording; average ultra-wide-angle camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.03.2025
Quelle: PurePC
PL→DEPositive: Powerful processor; high performance; nice cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; great display; long battery life; quick 80W charging; wateproof IP68/IP69; case included; eSIM support. Negative: Average 8MP ultra-wide camera; poor video recording; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: GeekWeek
PL→DEPositive: Beautiful OLED display; nice performance; impressive battery life; quick 80W charging; great cameras; waterproof IP69; elegant design. Negative: No charger included; non-MicroSD card slot; without wireless charging; easy getting dirts.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEPositive: Elegant design; waterproof ỊP69; nice cameras; decent performance; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: GSM Online PL
PL→DEPositive: Premium design; great display; long battery life; nice triple cameras; waterproof IP69; affordable price. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: Telepolis
PL→DEPositive: Premium design; nice AMOLED display; waterproof IP69 and dust avoiding; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras; long battery life; quick 80W charging. Negative: No charger included; plastic case; without memory card slot; many bloatwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: m GSM
PL→DEPositive: Great cameras; large battery capacity; quick 80W charging; beautiful design; tough device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Quelle: Techno Strefa
PL→DEPositive: Modern design; impressive display; waterproof IP68/IP69; excellent cameras; large battery capacity; quick 80W charging. Negative: Average gaming performance; poor video recording.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.02.2025
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Premium design; solid workmanship; great AMOLED display; decent hardware; impressive battery capacity; stereo speakers; NFC module; 5G. Negative: Without wireless charging; lack of MicroSD card slot; average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.01.2025
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Premium design; excellent display; high performance; long battery life; quick 80W charging; nice cameras. Negative: Lack of MicroSD card slot; without wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.12.2024
Quelle: Ferra.ru
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: 3DNews.ru
RU→DEPositive: Attractive design; beautiful AMOLED display; excellent battery life; quick charging; stereo speakers; waterproof IP68/IP69. Negative: No memory card slot; without mini jack; average cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2025
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DEPositive: Premium design; waterproof IP69; beautiful display. Negative: Average gaming performance; mediocre cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.03.2025
Quelle: Ferra.ru
RU→DEPositive: Excellent main camera; large battery capacity; premium design; waterproof IP69; affordable price. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.03.2025
Quelle: Zive
CZ→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz
CZ→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 81% Ausstattung: 77% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 82%
Quelle: XT Mobile
VN→DEPositive: Premium design; excellent display; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; nice main camera; large battery capacity; quick 80W charging. Negative: Plastic case; no MicroSD card slot; without wireless charging; poor selfie camera.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.01.2025
Quelle: Arena IT
→DEPositive: Beautiful design; very good autonomy; great cameras; waterproof IP69 and dust avoiding. Negative: Many bloatwares; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.03.2025
Quelle: Computerblog.ro
→DEPositive: Premium design; powerful processor; decent battery life; nice cameras; attractive price. Negative: Plastic case; lack of microSD card slot; without headphone jack; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.03.2025
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 810: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 SoC. Laut Qualcomm um 40% schneller als die alte Vorgängergeneration (Adreno 710).
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 7s Gen 3: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo Kernen (1x ARM Cortex-A720 2,5 GHz Prime Core, 3x ARM Cortex A720 2,4 GHz Performance-Cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A520 mit 1,8 Effizienz-Cluster) und einem 5G Modem. Der Chip wird im modernen 4nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .