Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

► remove from comparison Intel SP9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist ein sparsamer High-End Dual Core Prozessor für flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf dem Core 2 Duo P9500, wird jedoch nur in BGA (Ball Grid Array) Ausführung angeboten zum direkten Auflöten auf das Mainboard. Dadurch ist die Package Größe des Prozessors auch deutlich geringer (22m2 versus 35mm2 beim P9500). Der SP9600 kann dadurch in sehr flachen aber trotzdem leistungsstarken Notebooks eingesetzt werden (z.B. Lenovo Thinkpad T400s). Der Stromverbrauch von max. 25 W TDP ist jedoch identisch

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2530 MHz2500 MHz3060 MHz
FSB10668001066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm1-1.25V45 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86x86
$316 U.S.$316 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2836 Points (25%)
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009 Points
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5309 Points (7%)
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (7%)     max: 5854 Points
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SP9600 +
1863 s (22%)
116%
1 T9900 +
799 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 30.3     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (9%)     max: 58.5 s
31.6 s (6%)
25.1 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2189 Points (5%)
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
2787 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18 s (4%)
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
15.3 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43 s (2%)
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
37.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1117 s (5%)
1173 s (5%)
972 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23240 MIPS (11%)
23021 MIPS (11%)
25083 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18549 MFLOPS (14%)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
7587 Points (48%)
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
8922 Points (56%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.4 Points (77%)
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
5.7 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points
128%
1 T9900 +
6045 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 98% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 112% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 16. 11:05:28

#0 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 May 2022 13:12:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.011s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.012s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#85 got single benchmarks 500 +0.006s ... 0.022s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.024s

#88 got single benchmarks 377 +0.027s ... 0.05s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0.001s ... 0.051s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#91 got single benchmarks 475 +0.009s ... 0.06s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.064s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#182 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#183 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#185 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.074s

#186 return log +0s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)