Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen. Der später erschienenen T7250 bietet nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache dafür jedoch einen schnelleren FSB. Trotzdem sollte er im Schnitt langsamer sein.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum T5670, bietet der T5600 einen langsameren FSB mit 667 MHz  (deshalb auch der minimal höhere Takt) und keine Idle States Unterstützung. Dafür fehlen dem T5670 die Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1830 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm1.0375V-1.300V65 nm1.0375V-1.300V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.$241 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Benchmarks

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5600 +
48.8 s (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
min: 1540     avg: 1560     median: 1559.5 (3%)     max: 1579 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
215 Points (83%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
31 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
79 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
1818 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
min: 16812     avg: 18676     median: 16959 (8%)     max: 22256 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
min: 8209     avg: 10449     median: 11471 (9%)     max: 11667 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
561 Points (38%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
2091 Points (86%)
1792 Points (74%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
2018 Points (91%)
1740 Points (79%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
min: 5153     avg: 5868     median: 5902 (79%)     max: 6347 Points
min: 3579     avg: 4104     median: 4157 (26%)     max: 4522 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 94% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 15. 21:16:15

#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.005s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#42 got single benchmarks 168 +0.038s ... 0.044s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0s ... 0.044s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#45 got single benchmarks 171 +0.016s ... 0.061s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.07s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#109 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.071s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#111 return log +0.004s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)