Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

Der Core 2 Duo T7700 war der schnellste Merom basierte Core 2 Duo mit 35 Watt TDP. Die Penryn Nachfolger (z.B. Core 2 Duo T8300) waren bei gleichem Takt minimal schneller.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2400 MHz1800 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt20 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$307 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (23%)     max: 2598 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (6%)     max: 4665 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7700 +
1266 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7700 +
22156 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7700 +
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 02. 23:22:50

#0 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 383 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0s ... 0.005s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#42 got single benchmarks 323 +0.023s ... 0.029s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 383 +0s ... 0.029s

#44 got single benchmarks 383 +0s ... 0.029s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#77 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.033s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#79 return log +0.003s ... 0.037s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)