, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate etwas begrenzt.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2500 MHz1600 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1-1.25V45 nm0.775-1.1V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA956
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$289 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9300Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (7%)     max: 5854 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9300 +
31.6 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (5%)     max: 2336 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T9300 +
1173 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T9300 +
23021 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T9300 +
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9300 +
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 19. 04:53:32

#0 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 377 +0.031s ... 0.041s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0s ... 0.041s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#51 got single benchmarks 473 +0.006s ... 0.047s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#118 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#120 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)