Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

► remove from comparison

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren T-Prozessoren bietet der T6600 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (Virtualization Technology VT-x) und nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache (Topmodelle bis zu 6 MB). Der Stromverbrauch ist jedoch auch mit max. 35 Watt spezifiziert (TDP).

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6600 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock3060 MHz2200 MHz
FSB1066800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.2125 V45 nm, 1.00-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, SSE4.1
Architecturex86x86
$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2391     median: 2355 (21%)     max: 2631 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
min: 4335     avg: 4525     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4833 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T6600 +
min: 4229     avg: 4727     median: 4864.5 (4%)     max: 4948 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T6600 +
min: 2257     avg: 2454     median: 2463 (15%)     max: 2633 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
799 s (9%)
min: 1190     avg: 2015     median: 2269 (27%)     max: 2331 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
25.1 s (5%)
min: 37     avg: 63.1     median: 71.1 (14%)     max: 73.3 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2787 Points (6%)
min: 1852     avg: 1942     median: 1947 (4%)     max: 1989 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
15.3 s (3%)
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.1 s (2%)
min: 54     avg: 59     median: 60.5 (3%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
972 s (4%)
min: 1322     avg: 1334     median: 1334.5 (6%)     max: 1343 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
25083 MIPS (12%)
min: 20109     avg: 20199     median: 20216 (10%)     max: 20254 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
min: 14760     avg: 15060     median: 15119.5 (12%)     max: 15241 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
8922 Points (56%)
min: 3511     avg: 4691     median: 4746.5 (30%)     max: 5758 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9900 +
5.7 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6600 +
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (73%)     max: 5.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6045 Points (6%)
min: 4198     avg: 4217     median: 4216.5 (4%)     max: 4235 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 → 79% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 00:15:37

#0 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 485 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 475 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 485 +0s ... 0.019s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.02s

#51 got single benchmarks 485 +0.028s ... 0.048s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#138 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.058s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.084s

#140 return log +0.004s ... 0.088s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)