Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Xeon W-10885M

Intel Xeon W-10855M

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Xeon W-10855M ist ein Sechskern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die sechs Prozessorkerne mit 2,7 - 5,1 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo, alle 6 Kerne maximal 4,4 GHz). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics P630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Professionelle Variante des Intel Core i7-10850H mit leicht höheren Taktraten.

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der Xeon W-10855M unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i7-10850H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

Der Intel Xeon W-10885M ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 GHz bis 5,3 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics P630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down). Professionelle Variante des Intel Core i9-10885H.

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der Intel Xeon W-10885M unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i9-10885H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).

ModelIntel Xeon W-10855MIntel Xeon W-10885M
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Clock2800 - 5100 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
52.8 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6893 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1300 Points (65%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (64%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (16%)     max: 4065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (17%)     max: 1666 Points
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (72%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.3 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7865 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44583 Points (61%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (42%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (32%)     max: 48044 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (79%)     max: 5703 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.1 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236.9 fps (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (28%)     max: 13.6 fps
05101520Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13490 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (64%)     max: 18404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (50%)     max: 22279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (47%)     max: 9214 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1296 Points (63%)
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (66%)     max: 1347 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6231 Points (22%)
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (29%)     max: 8491 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (67%)     max: 1362 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (68%)     max: 5924 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (40%)     max: 32939 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (60%)     max: 231 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.9 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.8 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10855M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 119% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 05:51:39

#0 checking url part for id 12207 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 12207 +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 got single benchmarks 12207 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.018s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#31 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.012s ... 0.034s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.036s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.037s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.016s ... 0.054s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.059s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.073s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.084s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.088s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#120 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.09s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.022s ... 0.112s

#122 return log +0.004s ... 0.116s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)