Oppo Reno13
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.0, 21mm
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 17 Bewertungen (aus 33 Tests)
Testberichte für das Oppo Reno13
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEThe Oppo Reno 13 5G is another impeccably put-together mid-range phone from this quietly impressive brand. Its design, in particular, bears most of the hallmarks of a significantly more expensive handset, both in the materials and the build quality (IP69 certification is a stand-out spec). Performance is decent, the primary camera is solid, and Oppo’s front camera takes unusually proficient selfies. Oppo’s AI provision is also more extensive than most, with a full suite of enhancements of varying levels of usefulness. Oppo’s UI is a little cluttered, and there’s too much bloatware, but it’s fast and fluid enough, and the update promise is decent. As an overall package, the Oppo Reno 13 5G isn’t quite as impressive or well-rounded as the Google Pixel 9a, but it’s right up there with the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G as a viable mid-range alternative.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Smart
EN→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 16.05.2025
Quelle: Root Nation
EN→DEI spent three weeks with the OPPO Reno13 5G. I was impressed by its sleek, premium design, especially the unique “Butterfly Shadow” on the back panel and its solid build quality. It’s also worth noting the IP69 dust and water resistance, which makes the device not only stylish but also functional for daily use. I’m confident this design will appeal to many. OPPO has created an elegant and impressive smartphone. The experience is complemented by a high-quality AMOLED display with ultra-thin bezels, allowing for full content consumption despite the device’s compact size. For some reason, this smartphone reminded me more of an iPhone than an Android device, though that’s only in terms of design and comfort during use.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 96% Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100% Ergonomie: 100%
Quelle: Gadgetguy
EN→DEThe Oppo Reno 13 5G has a lot going for it, but it’s tough competition when, in roughly the same price range, you’ve got mid-range heavy hitters like the Samsung Galaxy A56 and soon-to-arrive Google Pixel 9a, not to mention the Apple iPhone 16e. They could also claim to blur the line between mid-range and premium. Assuming you’re not already wedded to one of these brands, the Oppo Reno 13 5G could win you over with its impressive display, decent cameras and long-lasting battery life, which ensures you can keep shooting all day.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Htxt Africa
EN→DEWith another OPPO review done, we can’t help but think of this manufacturer, especially the Reno range, as the star student in a class – it always does great work, it rarely steps afoul in tasks and you can always depend on it. While some may not like this steadfast commitment to the work and its perceived lack of surprise, we will always celebrate consistency and dependability, especially in a piece of tech that is so integral to daily life. The Reno13 5G may have tiny blemishes in its factory bloatware and camera switching in certain photography conditions, but these pail in comparison to its solid specs, fantastic real-world performance and beautiful photography results. The high build quality, in-box accessories and other solid factors we have come to expect from OPPO all make this another easy recommend from the company.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 31.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEAll in all, the Reno13 may convince some of you with its nice looks, fast charging, exceptional battery life and great selfies, especially in this compact 6.59-inch package. But there's more nuance to that. Looking at the broader picture, we find more powerful alternatives with superior all-round camera performance. And some of those have brighter displays, too. Still, we see the potential in the Reno13. It's not a bad phone per se, but it's a bit pricey for what it is. As the price settles with time, it will gradually become more competitive, but for now, it's a tough pick among its immediate competitors.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Hitech Century
EN→DEThe Oppo Reno13 5G bridges the gap between midrange and flagship phones, offering solid day-to-day performance, a versatile set of AI tools for productivity and photography, and a capable camera system. However, its shorter Android and security update lifespan, bloatware and slightly higher price tag compared to competitors are something to consider before buying.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.01.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Tech Nave
EN→DEThe OPPO Reno 13 series offers an interesting mix of design, performance, and features. For RM2299, we feel it is a solid option for those desiring a premium smartphone experience without an expensive cost. Alternatively, you can also opt for the realme GT6 (RM2499) for its performance and smooth gaming experience. You can also get the Xiaomi 14T Pro (RM2399) for a more economic all-rounder device. That begs the question, should you buy it? The answer is a solid yes.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.01.2025
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News
EN→DEOppo Reno 13 and 13 Pro have received some solid upgrades compared to its predecessor, which makes them a great choice for older Oppo Reno phone owners as well as for users who just want a new phone. The new smartphones provide a satisfactory experience in every aspect. The displays of both phones are quite impressive in terms of picture quality and clarity. The performance is also quite fabulous. It’s not as fast as the flagship chipsets but is faster than most mid-range and high-end chips. The camera performance of the two phones is also quite satisfactory. They won’t come anywhere close to the performance of the likes of the Samsung Galaxy S24 series but they are more than good enough. The battery life and charging speed are even more impressive than anything else on the two phones.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 16.12.2024
Quelle: Game IT
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 93% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70%
Quelle: 4G News
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Target HD
PT→DENegative: Without microSD card slot; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding; mediocre autonomy; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.04.2025
Quelle: Target HD
PT→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; sharp AMOLED display; nice cameras; long battery life; quick charging; 512GB ROM; good connectivity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.04.2025
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: HDblog.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Batista70Phone
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Techzilla.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 65% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: Evo smart
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66% Preis: 50% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Ceotech
IT→DEPositive: Beautiful display; premium design; high gaming performance; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 20.04.2025
Quelle: Mister Gadget
IT→DEPositive: Good price; very long battery life; great AI cameras; waterproof IP69; smart Android AI Functions. Negative: Mediocre design; unsupported wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2025
Quelle: Techprincess IT
IT→DEPositive: Elegant design; beautiful display; high performance; nice main camera; impressive battery life; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2025
Quelle: Nerd-mobile
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Premium design; decent processor; high performance; large battery capacity; quick 80W charging; 512GB ROM; support 5G & NFC module. Negative: Average cameras; mediocre speakers; dark display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.11.2024
Quelle: Root Nation UA
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 96% Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100% Ergonomie: 100%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DEPositive: Great display; decent performance; good main camera; waterproof IP69. Negative: Poor secondary camera; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.02.2025
Quelle: VNReview
VN→DEPositive: Impressive design; metal case; slim size; light weight; waterproof IP69; great AMOLED display; high performance; powerful processor; large battery capacity; quick 80W charging; nice dual speakers; smart AI Features; decent cameras. Negative: No telephoto camera; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.01.2025
Quelle: The Gioididong
VN→DEPositive: Elegant design; decent processor; long battery life; nice cameras.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.01.2025
Quelle: Techtimes.vn
VN→DEPositive: Stylish design; powerful hardware; high performance; nice AI cameras; great display; impressive quick charging speed.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.01.2025
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→DEPositive: Compact size; light weight; powerful processor; long battery life; slim size; light weight; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 27.11.2024
Quelle: Jagat Review
ID→DEPositive: Premium design; slim size; light weight; waterproof; high performance; large RAM & ROM; smart AI Features; rich set of packages.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.01.2025
Quelle: Mobile-com JP
JA→DEPositive: Elegant design; nice AMOLED display; good cameras; decent autonomy; quick 80W charging. Negative: No MicroSD card slot; average gaming performance; mediocre speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 12.12.2024
Kommentar
ARM Mali-G615 MP6: Mittelklasse Grafikchip für Smartphones mit 6 der 6 möglichen Kernen. Basiert auf die vierte Generation der Valhall Architektur. Bietet Variable Rate Shading.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
unknown: » Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .