Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SL9300 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.6 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Er bietet die Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und auch Trusted Execution Technology für Business Anwender.

Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 ist ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks in 2008. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet alle Funktionen des Kerns (wie VT-x Virtualisierungsfunktionen). 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9300Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2100 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.000V-1.250V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, Idle States
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.$209 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9300Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 2217     avg: 2310     median: 2320 (21%)     max: 2357 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4102     avg: 4251     median: 4282 (6%)     max: 4332 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T8100 +
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 1764     avg: 1851     median: 1878 (4%)     max: 1909 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.1 (5%)     max: 24.23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 54.6     avg: 55.2     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T8100 +
1347 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T8100 +
19291 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T8100 +
15392 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 3250     avg: 4504     median: 4605 (29%)     max: 5677 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4     avg: 4.8     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8100 +
4046 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 09. 00:18:09

#0 checking url part for id 423 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 got single benchmarks 423 +0s ... 0.007s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0s ... 0.007s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#50 got single benchmarks 380 +0.025s ... 0.032s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#100 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.038s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#102 return log +0.004s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)