, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate begrenzt.

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 war zur Zeit der Erscheinung ein schneller Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den Penryn Kern. Er bietet jedoch nur 3MB Level 2 Cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9300Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz2400 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.050V-1.150V45 nm1-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9300Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
$241 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1373     avg: 1392     median: 1391.5 (12%)     max: 1410 Points
min: 2406     avg: 2612     median: 2626 (23%)     max: 2704 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2435     avg: 2463     median: 2463 (3%)     max: 2491 Points
min: 3918     avg: 4773     median: 4837 (7%)     max: 4965 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1014     avg: 1028     median: 1028 (2%)     max: 1042 Points
min: 1986     avg: 2121     median: 2143 (5%)     max: 2181 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 50     avg: 50.5     median: 50.5 (2%)     max: 50.996 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1992 s (9%)
1206 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
9372 MIPS (4%)
22062 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
8811 MFLOPS (7%)
17583 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2608     avg: 2827     median: 2827 (18%)     max: 3046 Points
min: 4358     avg: 5255     median: 5311 (33%)     max: 6090 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8300 +
min: 4     avg: 5.1     median: 5.3 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8300 +
4628 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → 189% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 06:59:26

#0 checking url part for id 425 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 425 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 425 +0.011s ... 0.019s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0s ... 0.02s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.02s

#51 got single benchmarks 379 +0.024s ... 0.045s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.046s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.051s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#121 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#123 return log +0.004s ... 0.057s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)