Notebookcheck Logo

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz vs Mediatek MT8768

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

Mediatek MT8768

Mediatek Helio MT8768

Der MediaTek MT8768 ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,5 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren Helio A25, der MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher. Der MT8768T wiederum bietet nochmals schneller getaktete Kerne.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G. Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der A25 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahrens produziert.

show full text
ModelTelechips TCC8803 1GHzMediatek MT8768
Series Mediatek Mediatek MT8
Serie: Mediatek MT8 Cortex-A53
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Mediatek MT8768 « 1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1000 MHz1500 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 18 / 8
Technology65 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A53
FeaturesLTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 650 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8768
0.3 pt (22%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -43%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 -40%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -38%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -37%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -29%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -25%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -19%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 3%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 10%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 10%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 17%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 17%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 54%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 354%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11228     avg: 11876     median: 11431 (10%)     max: 12969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 957     avg: 1390     median: 1251.5 (15%)     max: 2101 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 969     avg: 1146     median: 1144 (13%)     max: 1328 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
185 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
848 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 135     avg: 156     median: 155 (7%)     max: 179 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 498     avg: 775     median: 798.5 (1%)     max: 1003 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
789 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3745 Points (4%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10163.3     avg: 11131     median: 11009 (13%)     max: 12342 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4070     avg: 4855     median: 4215 (4%)     max: 6281 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
30 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 24     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (7%)     max: 39 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 19097     avg: 21572     median: 21571.5 (18%)     max: 24046 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 15791     avg: 19538     median: 19538 (16%)     max: 23285 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 11434     avg: 11546     median: 11546 (2%)     max: 11658 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 35898     avg: 37935     median: 37935 (14%)     max: 39972 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 89714     avg: 90591     median: 90590.5 (9%)     max: 91467 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
132881 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
40100 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
6.9 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
171.2 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
18.7 MB/s (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
249 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6296 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4564     avg: 5215     median: 5215 (24%)     max: 5866 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2269 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5264 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4536     avg: 4750     median: 4750 (31%)     max: 4964 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5647     avg: 6171     median: 6170.5 (31%)     max: 6694 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
232 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.8 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8768 → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 19:06:34

#0 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12755 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:38:31 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.008s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12755 +0.013s ... 0.076s

#9 got single benchmarks 12755 +0.014s ... 0.089s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.074s ... 0.164s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.187s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)