Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der Prozessor basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu teureren Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, wurde jedoch beim P7350 die Virtualisierungsfunktion VT deaktiviert.

Durch die relativ geringe Taktrate von 2 GHz, ist die Performance bei manchen Spielen etwas begrenzt. Durch die schnelle Core 2 Duo Architektur, dem 1066 MHz getakteten FSB (effektiv) und den 3 MB Level 2 Cache, kann sich der P7350 gegenüber dem 2.4 GHz schnellen Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 klar durchsetzen (bei geringerem Stromverbrauch der Intel CPU).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P7350 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

► remove from comparison Intel P8800

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8800 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.66 GHz, ist die Performance jedoch für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert von einem schnelleren Prozessor).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1 - 1.25 V45 nm1.00V-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketSocket PBGA479, PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologySSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
$241 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 P8800 +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2128     avg: 2179     median: 2140 (19%)     max: 2413 Points
min: 2798     avg: 2890     median: 2932 (26%)     max: 2940 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4009     avg: 4124     median: 4036 (6%)     max: 4633 Points
min: 5240     avg: 5357     median: 5370 (7%)     max: 5460 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
38.3 s (8%)
min: 30.8     avg: 31.4     median: 31.4 (6%)     max: 31.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 982     avg: 994     median: 993.5 (12%)     max: 1005 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1407     avg: 1734     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 2309     avg: 2355     median: 2355 (5%)     max: 2401 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25.4     avg: 25.9     median: 25.9 (6%)     max: 26.36 s
min: 19     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.5 s (3%)
min: 44     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1438 s (6%)
min: 961     avg: 1049     median: 1048.5 (5%)     max: 1136 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 24450     avg: 26155     median: 26155 (12%)     max: 27860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P8800 +
18000 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7350 +
min: 4507     avg: 5019     median: 4805 (30%)     max: 5833 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P7350 +
5 Points (71%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P8800 +
6.3 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3825     avg: 3896     median: 3883.5 (4%)     max: 3990 Points
4658 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 → 116% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 02. 00:40:43

#0 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 477 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 410 +0.023s ... 0.032s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 477 +0s ... 0.032s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#51 got single benchmarks 477 +0.007s ... 0.039s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#115 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.048s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.023s ... 0.071s

#117 return log +0.004s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)