, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Unterschied zum C2D T6600, bietet der T6670 Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und eine höhere maximale Temperatur von 105°C. Dadurch eignet er sich eher für Business Notebooks.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6670 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

 

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove from comparison Intel P8400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8400 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Der P8400 ist sehr ähnlich zu der OEM Version Core 2 Duo P7550, welcher später auf den Markt kam.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P8400 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2260 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.15
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
L1 Cache128 KB
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
$209 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2352     avg: 2365     median: 2365 (21%)     max: 2378 Points
min: 2418     avg: 2527     median: 2497 (22%)     max: 2882 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4428     avg: 4434     median: 4430 (6%)     max: 4444 Points
min: 4507     avg: 4701     median: 4630 (6%)     max: 5314 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6670 +
2196 s (26%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 34.975     avg: 52.1     median: 52.1 (10%)     max: 69.14 s
34.2 s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1850 Points (4%)
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (4%)     max: 2084 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.868     avg: 33.4     median: 33.4 (7%)     max: 43 s
min: 21.746     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (5%)     max: 22.714 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
101 s (4%)
min: 50.65     avg: 51.5     median: 51.7 (2%)     max: 52.229 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2241 s (10%)
1212 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
11254 MIPS (5%)
21204 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
8839 MFLOPS (7%)
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4384     avg: 4567     median: 4559 (29%)     max: 4757 Points
min: 3410     avg: 5117     median: 5201.5 (33%)     max: 6255 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P8400 +
5.2 Points (74%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6670 +
5.6 Points (72%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P8400 +
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (4%)     max: 4475 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 → 122% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 19. 05:42:43

#0 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 398 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 467 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 398 +0s ... 0.018s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.019s

#51 got single benchmarks 398 +0.038s ... 0.058s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#147 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.068s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#149 return log +0.004s ... 0.072s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)