Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek MT8161 vs Mediatek MT8768

MediaTek MT8161

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MT8161 ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 Grafikkarte und einen LPDDR3 Speicherkontroller (z.B. mit 1 GB im Lenovo Tab 2 A8-50). An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0 und Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN.

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

Mediatek MT8768

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio MT8768

Der MediaTek MT8768 ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,5 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren Helio A25, der MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher. Der MT8768T wiederum bietet nochmals schneller getaktete Kerne.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G. Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der A25 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahrens produziert.

ModelMediaTek MT8161Mediatek MT8768
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Mediatek MT8
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek MT8 Cortex-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 « 1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1300 MHz1500 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm
FeaturesLP-DDR3 memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, embedded GPS / GLONASS / BeiDou module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM Jazelle, ARM TrustZoneLTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2PowerVR GE8320 ( - 650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8768
0.3 pt (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8693 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8398 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
9598 Points (8%)
min: 11228     avg: 11876     median: 11431 (10%)     max: 12969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 957     avg: 1390     median: 1251.5 (5%)     max: 2101 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 969     avg: 1146     median: 1144 (13%)     max: 1328 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
185 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
848 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 135     avg: 156     median: 155 (7%)     max: 179 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 498     avg: 775     median: 798.5 (1%)     max: 1003 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
789 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3745 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8161 +
1838 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8161 +
616 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
24610 ms (29%)
min: 10163.3     avg: 11131     median: 11009 (13%)     max: 12342 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1713 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1654 ms (16%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2510 Points (2%)
min: 4070     avg: 4855     median: 4215 (4%)     max: 6281 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
30 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 24     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (7%)     max: 39 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT8161 +
911 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT8161 +
1398 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT8161 +
1866 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
7512 points (17%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
26820 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 19097     avg: 21572     median: 21571.5 (18%)     max: 24046 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 15791     avg: 19538     median: 19538 (16%)     max: 23285 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 11434     avg: 11546     median: 11546 (2%)     max: 11658 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 35898     avg: 37935     median: 37935 (14%)     max: 39972 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 89714     avg: 90591     median: 90590.5 (9%)     max: 91467 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
132881 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
40100 Points (11%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8161 +
768 Iter./s (24%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8161 +
7742 Iter./s (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8161 +
43768 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
3396 Points (17%)
min: 5647     avg: 6171     median: 6170.5 (31%)     max: 6694 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
6.9 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
171.2 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
18.7 MB/s (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
249 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6296 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4564     avg: 5215     median: 5215 (24%)     max: 5866 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2269 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5264 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4536     avg: 4750     median: 4750 (31%)     max: 4964 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
232 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.8 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8161 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8768 → 148% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 02:07:42

#0 checking url part for id 6882 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12755 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6882 +0.002s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 6882 +0.012s ... 0.062s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12755 +0.014s ... 0.076s

#9 got single benchmarks 12755 +0.015s ... 0.092s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.107s ... 0.199s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.223s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)