Oppo A5 2020
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 7 Bewertungen (aus 24 Tests)
Testberichte für das Oppo A5 2020
Quelle: Recombu
EN→DE Archive.org versionOppo A5 2020 is a great phone if you’re feeling at all apprehensive about sporting a device that uses cheaper materials – none of your mates will clock this is a sub-£200 device. A big battery and display make for strong experience, even if a low resolution is a bit of a letdown.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 08.10.2020
Quelle: Techradar
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe Oppo A5 2020 when judged against its price comes out very well indeed: for not much money at all, you get a device that is competent in most areas and really good in a couple.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Advisor
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe Oppo A5 2020 is bread-and-butter proof that you don’t need to spend a fortune for some impressive bits of kit on a smartphone. With a 5000mAh battery, a large display and an aesthetically-pleasing design to boot. The camera isn’t as strong as what we’ve seen on other budget phones, but this is still a great buy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Pocket Lint
EN→DE Archive.org versionIf you're looking for an affordable phone there are plenty of good options, this Oppo A5 included among them. Its battery life is exceptional, with near two-day life, its screen is large, and its processor ample for tasks and games. However, the screen could be higher-res and less prone to smears, while the 'quad camera' system is a total oversell.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Stuff TV
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe Oppo A5 2020 is great for the hardcore phone user who isn’t a hardcore tech snob. A big screen and battery let you stream a lot of music and video, and play games without having to worry about running out of charge.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.02.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe Oppo A5 2020 is just the kind of phone I end up recommending most often to friends. Its cost is low enough to make a SIM-free buy perfectly reasonable, it looks good and should have the CPU power, RAM and battery capacity to make use headache-free.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.01.2020
Quelle: Unbox
EN→DE Archive.org versionBeing at least Php 5k more affordable than the A9 2020, the A5 2020 is arguably the better choice. You don’t really lose out much: save for lower RAM, a 12-megapixel main shooter, and 8-megapixel selfie camera, you still get the majority of the A9 2020’s key features: Snapdragon 665, 5000mAh battery with USB-C charging, and stereo speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.11.2019
Quelle: Mobygyaan
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe OPPO A5 2020 is a smartphone made for the casual users out there. It doesn’t have any major flaws but it doesn’t offer what you pay for. There are smartphones like Realme 5 Pro, Redmi Note 7 Pro, and Vivo Z1 Pro which offer much better specs at the same price range. If you are looking for a smartphone for playing PUBG or some other heavy games ignore this one. On the other hand, if you are looking for a smartphone that comes with good speakers so you can enjoy watching videos and multitask easily then you can go for the OPPO A5 2020.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.09.2019
Quelle: Top for Phone
FR→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; decent speakers; long battery life; great built quality; big screen; mini jack; nice performance. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.07.2020
Quelle: Tabletowo
PL→DE Archive.org versionEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 100% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 95%
Quelle: Tabletowo
PL→DE Archive.org versionEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.11.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 100% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 95%
Quelle: Product Test
RU→DE Archive.org versionEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.12.2019
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 88% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 92%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Powerful processor; large battery capacity; great speakers; NFC chip; nice connectivity. Negative: Plastic case; wide frames; poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.03.2020
Quelle: Zoom
RU→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Big screen; good price; powerful processor; high autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.02.2020
Quelle: i2Hard
RU→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Long battery life; high performance; NFC chup; long battery life; great speakers. Negative: Easy getting fingerprints.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.12.2019
Quelle: Mega Obzor
RU→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Long battery life; powerful processor; nice speakers; excellent cameras; bright design. Negative: Poor display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: High performance; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2020
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; beautiful design; nice cameras; high performance; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Nice quad cameras; long battery life; high performance; big screen; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice cameras; decent hardware; high gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 23.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Large battery capacity; nice quad cameras; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.10.2019
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; decent processor; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.10.2019
Quelle: Viettelstore
VN→DE Archive.org versionNegative: Thick frames; poor display; slow charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.10.2019
Quelle: The Gioididong
VN→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price. Negative: Only microUSB port; poor display; thick frames; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.10.2019
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoC. Die Performance ist vergleichbar mit dem alten Adreno 512 und daher in der unteren Mittelklasse.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 665: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 260 Kernen (4x 2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold Cortex-A73 Derivat, 4x 1,8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex-A53 Derivat) und einem X12 LTE Modem (bis zu 600 Mbps Download). Hergestellt in 11 nm LPP.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
