Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der Prozessor basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu teureren Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, wurde jedoch beim P7350 die Virtualisierungsfunktion VT deaktiviert.

Durch die relativ geringe Taktrate von 2 GHz, ist die Performance bei manchen Spielen etwas begrenzt. Durch die schnelle Core 2 Duo Architektur, dem 1066 MHz getakteten FSB (effektiv) und den 3 MB Level 2 Cache, kann sich der P7350 gegenüber dem 2.4 GHz schnellen Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 klar durchsetzen (bei geringerem Stromverbrauch der Intel CPU).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P7350 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2130 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1 - 1.25 V45 nm, 1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketSocket PPGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2128     avg: 2179     median: 2140 (19%)     max: 2413 Points
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (21%)     max: 2575 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4009     avg: 4124     median: 4036 (6%)     max: 4633 Points
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (6%)     max: 4863 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
38.3 s (8%)
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1230     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1243 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1407     avg: 1734     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1832 Points
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25.4     avg: 25.9     median: 25.9 (6%)     max: 26.36 s
min: 22     avg: 23.5     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.5 s (3%)
min: 54     avg: 55.7     median: 55.4 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1438 s (6%)
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4507     avg: 5019     median: 4805 (30%)     max: 5833 Points
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5 Points (71%)
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3825     avg: 3896     median: 3883.5 (4%)     max: 3990 Points
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 103% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 08. 01:16:10

#0 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.006s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 410 +0.028s ... 0.035s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.035s

#11 got single benchmarks 445 +0.021s ... 0.056s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.058s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.065s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.067s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#45 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.068s

#46 return log +0.026s ... 0.094s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)