, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

Der Core 2 Duo SL9400 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9380 bietet der SL9400 einen schnelleren FSB mit 1066 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der Prozessor basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu teureren Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, wurde jedoch beim P7350 die Virtualisierungsfunktion VT deaktiviert.

Durch die relativ geringe Taktrate von 2 GHz, ist die Performance bei manchen Spielen etwas begrenzt. Durch die schnelle Core 2 Duo Architektur, dem 1066 MHz getakteten FSB (effektiv) und den 3 MB Level 2 Cache, kann sich der P7350 gegenüber dem 2.4 GHz schnellen Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 klar durchsetzen (bei geringerem Stromverbrauch der Intel CPU).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P7350 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1860 MHz2000 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.050V - 1.150V45 nm1 - 1.25 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA956Socket P
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTSSE4.1, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (19%)     max: 2205 Points
min: 2128     avg: 2179     median: 2140 (19%)     max: 2413 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (5%)     max: 3864 Points
min: 4009     avg: 4124     median: 4036 (6%)     max: 4633 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 1329.49     avg: 1355     median: 1354.7 (16%)     max: 1379.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 41.932     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
38.3 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
min: 1407     avg: 1734     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1832 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
min: 25.396     avg: 25.9     median: 25.9 (6%)     max: 26.364 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
59.5 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
1438 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
min: 4507     avg: 5019     median: 4805 (30%)     max: 5833 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.8 Points (69%)
5 Points (71%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3809 Points (4%)
min: 3825     avg: 3896     median: 3883.5 (4%)     max: 3990 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 106% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 04:57:54

#0 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0s ... 0.011s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#48 got single benchmarks 422 +0.01s ... 0.022s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0s ... 0.022s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#51 got single benchmarks 410 +0.029s ... 0.052s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.053s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#119 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.063s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#121 return log +0.003s ... 0.067s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)