, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i3-10100

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i3-10100 ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Comet Lake S-Architektur. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,3 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i3-10100 im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++). Im Vergleich zum älteren i3-9100 (Comet Lake-S) bietet der 10100 einen 100 MHz höheren Turbo-Takt, Multithreading und Support für schnelleren DDR4-2666 Speicher.

Performance

Die Leistung sollte nur leicht oberhalb des Core i3-9100 im Einstiegsbereich für Desktop-CPUs liegen. Dadurch reicht die Leistung für Office und anspruchsloses Gaming.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-10100 handelt es sich um einen Prozessor mit integrierter Grafikeinheit (Intel UHD Graphics 630). 

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

Intel Core i7-10700

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i7-10700 ist eine High-End-CPU mit zehn Kernen auf Basis der neuen Comet-Lake-Architektur, die Ende April 2020 bereits angekündigt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,9-4,8 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i7-10700 weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess. Mit seiner geringen TDP (65 Watt) eignet sich dieser Prozessor für sehr kompakte Systeme. Auf einen freien Multiplikators zum Übertakten muss allerdings verzichtet werden.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i7-9700 bietet der Core i7-10700 nun Hyperthreading, was bei Multi-Thread-Anwendungen für einen ordentlichen Performance-Schub sorgt. Die Single-Core-Leistung bleibt nahezu unverändert auf dem Niveau des Vorgängers. Dank des Turbo Boost 3.0 kann der Intel Core i7-10700 bis zu 4,8 GHz auf einem Kern erreichen. Im Vergleich dazu kam der Core i7-9700 nur auf 4,7 GHz. Gleichwohl liegt der All-Core-Boost des Core i7-10700 noch bei 4,6 GHz. Allerdings spielen hierfür viele Faktoren eine Rolle (Art des Workloads, Anzahl aktiver CPU-Kerne, kalkulierte Stromstärke, kalkulierte Leistungsaufnahme, CPU-Temperatur).

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i7-10700 mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Hier hat Intel deutliche Veränderungen vorgenommen und dem Intel Core i7-107000 einen Spielraum von bis zu 224 Watt (PL2) unter Volllast eingeräumt. Die angegebene TDP von 65 Watt (PL1) wird in den meisten Fällen fast immer überschritten, was an den geänderten PL2 (224 Watt) sowie dem Tau-Wert (28 Sekunden) liegt. Aufgrund der deutlich höheren Leistungsaufnahme sollte der Core i7-10700K mit einer leistungsstarken Kühlung verwendet werden.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100Intel Core i7-10700
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
» Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz2900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache6 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA12001200
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
$130 U.S.$340 U.S.
Announced
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i7-10700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
8532 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
1234 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
436 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2181 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
895 Points (9%)
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
1455 Points (15%)
075150225300375450525600675750825900975105011251200127513501425Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
181 Points (63%)
196 Points (69%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.9 Points (18%)
16.7 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (59%)
2.3 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6863 Points (61%)
7611 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26903 Points (37%)
41156 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
34987 Points (31%)
52577 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8914 Points (55%)
9898 Points (61%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
194 s (2%)
119 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6124 Points (39%)
6555 Points (42%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 24319     avg: 24356     median: 24355.5 (17%)     max: 24392 MIPS
43007 MIPS (30%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4797     avg: 4853     median: 4853 (70%)     max: 4909 MIPS
5293 MIPS (76%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
55.8 fps (25%)
84.8 fps (38%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
213 fps (58%)
236 fps (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.7     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (17%)     max: 7.78 fps
01234567891011121314Tooltip
11.6 fps (25%)
05101520Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (17%)
1.1 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (18%)
1.8 GB/s (37%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (19%)
10.3 GB/s (38%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 492.2     avg: 494     median: 493.7 (3%)     max: 495.1 Seconds
315 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.652 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.9 s (2%)
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20 s (1%)
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
482 s (2%)
440 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15497 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 61562     avg: 74373     median: 74373 (48%)     max: 87184 Points
62614 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 61702     avg: 74370     median: 74369.5 (66%)     max: 87037 Points
62334 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 62930     avg: 74011     median: 74011 (68%)     max: 85092 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9394     avg: 16477     median: 16477 (42%)     max: 23560 Points
13579 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13268     avg: 24581     median: 24581 (62%)     max: 35894 Points
20080 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5274     avg: 5304     median: 5303.5 (29%)     max: 5333 Points
8580 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5494     avg: 5563     median: 5563 (64%)     max: 5632 Points
5726 Points (66%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18622     avg: 18692     median: 18692 (23%)     max: 18762 Points
32174 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1167     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (60%)     max: 1200 Points
1304 Points (66%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4724     avg: 4748     median: 4748 (15%)     max: 4772 Points
8196 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1188     median: 1187.5 (58%)     max: 1204 Points
1299 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4740     avg: 4758     median: 4758 (17%)     max: 4776 Points
8173 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 833     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (1%)     max: 838 ms
752 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 208     median: 207.5 (59%)     max: 213 Points
244 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.54     avg: 115     median: 115.2 (20%)     max: 121.95 Watt
116 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 96.66     avg: 102     median: 101.9 (27%)     max: 107.08 Watt
148 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.3 Points per Watt (11%)
9.8 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10700 → 129% n=37

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 24. 23:13:17

#0 checking url part for id 12793 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13214 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 12793 +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 got single benchmarks 12793 +0.009s ... 0.016s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 13214 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#23 got single benchmarks 13214 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.025s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.031s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.038s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.016s ... 0.062s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.071s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.085s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.088s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#131 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.09s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#133 return log +0.004s ... 0.094s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)