Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8766B vs Mediatek MT8735

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison Helio MT8766B

Der MediaTek MT8766B Helio A20 ist eine ARM-SoC für günstige Android-Smartphones und -tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das SoC besitzt 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz Takt und ähnelt daher dem Helios A20 (1.8 GHz).

Als Grafikchip kommt ein PowerVR GE8300 zum Einsatz (max. 1600x720 Pixel), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3/LPDDR4X.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G mit bis zu 150 Mbps Download (Cat-4) und 75 Mbps Upload (Cat-5). Bluetooth 5.0 (?) und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der A20 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahrens produziert.

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

show full text
ModelMediatek MT8766BMediatek MT8735
Series Mediatek MT8 Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz1300 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 Decode4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou
iGPUPowerVR GE8300ARM Mali-T720
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 9%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 24%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 31%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 43%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 75%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 81%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 89%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 697%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13779 Points (12%)
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
853 Points (10%)
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
860 Points (10%)
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
133 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
455 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (8%)
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2217 Points (2%)
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
741 Points (10%)
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2043 Points (5%)
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
11505 ms (13%)
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1609 ms (18%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3920 Points (4%)
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
15424 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24878 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
4722 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
30304 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
75328 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2761 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6844 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4808 Points (31%)
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
6431 Points (32%)
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 80% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 07:40:42

#0 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.015s ... 0.035s

#7 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.012s ... 0.047s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#9 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.018s ... 0.069s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.127s ... 0.195s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.198s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.2s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.202s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.205s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.233s

#17 return log +0.106s ... 0.339s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)