Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

► remove from comparison Intel P9500

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor wurde später vom 2.63 GHz schnellen P9600 zum selben Startpreis abgelöst, welcher ebenfalls nur 25 Watt braucht. 

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9500 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz2530 MHz3060 MHz
FSB106610661066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.15V45 nm45 nm, 1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA479, PGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
$348 U.S.$530 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (19%)     max: 2575 Points
min: 2758     avg: 2944     median: 2901 (24%)     max: 3234 Points
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (29%)     max: 3722 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (5%)     max: 4863 Points
min: 5245     avg: 5607     median: 5501.5 (6%)     max: 6104 Points
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (8%)     max: 7247 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1230     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1243 s
106%
1 T9900 +
799 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
30.5 s (6%)
25.1 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
min: 1687     avg: 2198     median: 2311 (5%)     max: 2350 Points
2787 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 23.5     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
min: 17.67     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.31 s
15.3 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 55.7     median: 55.4 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
min: 42.49     avg: 43.2     median: 43.2 (2%)     max: 43.91 s
37.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
1101 s (5%)
972 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
23667 MIPS (11%)
25083 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
17820 MFLOPS (14%)
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
min: 4598     avg: 6203     median: 6250 (39%)     max: 7387 Points
8922 Points (56%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
5.4 Points (77%)
5.7 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points
min: 5060     avg: 5142     median: 5157 (5%)     max: 5210 Points
6045 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 115% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 132% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 29. 23:09:15

#0 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:15:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 445 +0.024s ... 0.035s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0s ... 0.035s

#13 got single benchmarks 405 +0.017s ... 0.052s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.052s

#15 got single benchmarks 475 +0.008s ... 0.061s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.068s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.076s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#59 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.077s

#60 return log +0s ... 0.077s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)