, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 war zur Zeit der Erscheinung ein schneller Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den Penryn Kern. Er bietet jedoch nur 3MB Level 2 Cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

Der Core 2 Duo SL9400 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9380 bietet der SL9400 einen schnelleren FSB mit 1066 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T8300Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2400 MHz1860 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1-1.25V45 nm1.050V - 1.150V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA956
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$241 U.S.$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T8300Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2406     avg: 2612     median: 2626 (23%)     max: 2704 Points
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (19%)     max: 2205 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3918     avg: 4773     median: 4837 (7%)     max: 4965 Points
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (5%)     max: 3864 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 1329.49     avg: 1355     median: 1354.7 (16%)     max: 1379.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 41.932     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1986     avg: 2121     median: 2143 (5%)     max: 2181 Points
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21 s
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 50     avg: 50.5     median: 50.5 (2%)     max: 50.996 s
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1206 s (5%)
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22062 MIPS (10%)
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
17583 MFLOPS (13%)
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4358     avg: 5255     median: 5311 (33%)     max: 6090 Points
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
min: 4     avg: 5.1     median: 5.3 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4628 Points (5%)
3809 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 84% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 23:58:24

#0 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 379 +0.022s ... 0.032s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0s ... 0.032s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#51 got single benchmarks 422 +0.009s ... 0.042s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#140 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#142 return log +0.003s ... 0.056s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)