MSI X-Slim X350
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 7 Bewertungen (aus 8 Tests)
Testberichte für das MSI X-Slim X350
Quelle: Computer Shopper
EN→DE Archive.org versionMSI may have found the magic balance between comfort and portability. The MSI X-Slim X350 maintains the MacBook Air–style thin-and-light form factor we liked so much in last year’s X340 model, while addressing our complaints about the keyboard, performance, and battery life. The MSI X350 is an attractive, slim ultraportable that’s extremely comfortable to use. It offers excellent battery life and responsive, if not exceptional, performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.10.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Hardware Central
EN→DE Archive.org versionOdd associations come to mind when trying to describe the MSI X350, a notebook so slim that its front edge comes almost to a point like the stapled side of a magazine. But these things are tradeoffs; the MSI is priced well below the MacBook Air, and its performance is adequate considering its combination of sky-high portability, screen legibility, decent battery life, and an excellent keyboard. It's a solid choice for office workers who seek to travel light.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.08.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Preis: 60% Leistung: 80% Ausstattung: 80%
Quelle: Good Gear Guide
EN→DE Archive.org versionMSI's X-Slim X350 is an ultralight 13in laptop with smooth curves, clean lines and plenty of flair. The X-Slim X350 is perfect for anyone who wants a thin and light notebook -- and is willing to sacrifice performance. It's a reasonably comfortable notebook to use and it's also very stylish. However, we wish it had more RAM and better battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.07.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Laptop Mag
EN→DE Archive.org versionAt first blush, the $899 ($999 MSRP) MSI X350 seems rather expensive by today’s standards, particularly when you compare it to faster competitors such as the Apple MacBook or the ASUS U30Jc-1A. However, for its premium price, MSI provides a notebook that’s easier to carry. We also appreciate the comfortable keyboard and long battery life. Though we wish the MSI X350 achieved better performance and included 64-bit Windows, this fashion-forward ultraportable is a strong contender. If you crave more speed, hold out for the X360, which will feature a Core i5 processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.06.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Digital Versus
EN→DE Archive.org versionSuccessor to the X340, the MSI X-Slim X350 uses the same ulra-thin design that is the mark of the range. In spite of a few improvements on the previous version, the MSI X-Slim X50 still struggles to convince. Performance levels are however fine for portable use. The glossy screen is still a real weak point and the low battery life means it’s no replacement for a netbook.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Techtree.com
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe MSI X350 is priced at Rs. 45,000. It comes with a two-year warranty, which is great since most manufacturers just give one year. But the pricing is slightly over-the-top. At that price, they should have at least thrown in an external DVD writer. Comparatively, a similarly spec'ed Dell Vostro V13 with a 500GB hard drive will cost you a little under Rs. 40,000. Overall, we do not have much to complain about the laptop other than the track-pad issue mentioned before. As my colleague rightly put it, screwing up the track-pad on a laptop is like screwing up a steering wheel in a car. MSI should really take note of this and fix it at the soonest. And if the price is dropped to around 40k, then the X350 will defnitely get a recommendation from us. If you are willing to adapt to the average track-pad - or better, use an external mouse - the X350 is a good choice for people looking for a thin laptop to do office work and probably watch HD movies when not working. However, we advise you to wait till the price falls to 40k.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.02.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Erenumerique
FR→DE Archive.org versionEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2010
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Zoom
RU→DE Archive.org versionEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 01.04.2010
Bewertung: Mobilität: 60%
Kommentar
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD: Im GM45, GS45 und GE45 Chipsatz (Montevina Plattform) integrierte shared Memory Grafikkarte von Intel. Durch höhere Taktung und mehr Shader ist sie deutlich schneller als die X3100, jedoch immer noch nicht für Spieler empfehlenswert. Kann HD-Videos (AVC/VC2/MPEG2) dekodieren und so die CPU entlasten.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Intel Core 2 Duo: Core Duo Nachfolger mit längerer Pipeline und 5-20% Geschwindigkeitszuwachs bei 0.5 - 3 Watt mehr Stromverbrauch.
Der Notebook Core 2 Duo ist baugleich mit den Desktop Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, jedoch werden die Notebook-Prozessoren mit niedrigeren Spannungen und geringerem Frontsidebus Takt betrieben. Von der Leistung bleiben gleichgetaktete Notebooks deswegen (und auch wegen der langsameren Festplatten) 20-25% hinter Desktop PCs.
SU7300: Langsam getakteter Core 2 Duo Prozessor mit 3 MB Level 2 Cache und geringem TDP von 10 Watt.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .



