Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

The Ryzen 7 9700X is an upper mid-range desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 8 Zen 5 cores (16 threads) running at 3.8 GHz to 5.5 GHz, PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in July.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9700X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9700X has 32 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5600 MT/s, ECC memory included - this too depends on the motherboard.

The 9700X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

If early July leaks are any indication, the 9700X is set to have multi-thread performance matching the fastest laptop chips such as the 24-core Core i9-13950HX. We'll update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9700X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with a 4 nm TSMC process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is 65 W. It'll probably consume at least 100 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900

Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 ist ein High-End-Desktop-Prozessor der Raphael Serie mit 12-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT), womit dieser in Summe bis zu 24 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Mit der Vorstellung Anfang 2023 ist der Ryzen 9 7900 der schnellste 12-Kern-Prozessor mit 65 Watt TDP. 

Der Ryzen 9 7900 taktet mit 3,7 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,4 GHz auf einem Kern. Dies ist auch der Unterschied zum höher getaktetem Ryzen 9 7900X.

Der interne Aufbau des Prozessors hat sich auf den ersten Blick nicht grundlegend verändert. Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 basiert weiterhin auf dem Chiplet-Design bestehend aus zwei CCD-Clustern, welche jeweils einen CCX mit 8-Kernen beinhalten. Mit 5 nm wurde allerdings der Fertigungsprozess verkleinert, wodurch die höheren Taktraten zu gewährleisten sind. Weiterhin gibt es den IO-Die, der unter anderem den Speichercontroller sowie die iGPU beinhaltet. Dieser wird nunmehr in 6 nm Strukturbreite gefertigt.

In Spielen kann der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 dank der deutlich verbesserten IPC überzeugen. 

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9700XAMD Ryzen 9 7900
CodenameGranite RidgeRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Serie: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X compare4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X « 3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X compare3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 « 3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5500 MHz3700 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB
L3 Cache32 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.5 GHz AMD Zen 5
12 / 24
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology4 nm & 6 nm5 nm
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
SocketAM5AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Transistors9.9 Million
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V
Die Size262 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 9700X
47.2 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900
46.1 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
136 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1203 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20485 Points (19%)
24776 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2211 Points (90%)
1966 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
870 Points (95%)
762 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7956 Points (19%)
9703 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3178 Points (20%)
4020 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
346 Points (96%)
315 Points (87%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.2 Points (47%)
45.3 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.06     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
3.7 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9457 Points (57%)
8339 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57914 Points (42%)
60934 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108170 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17765 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
59.6 s (1%)
46.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13549 Points (21%)
10154 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
82553 MIPS (47%)
112881 MIPS (65%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7894 MIPS (93%)
7936 MIPS (94%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (4%)
207 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
376 fps (10%)
355.5 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
26.4 fps (46%)
31.2 fps (55%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
2 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
3.1 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.1 GB/s (42%)
21.5 GB/s (56%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
244 Seconds (3%)
199 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
154 Seconds (1%)
125 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18794 Points (40%)
19451 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
369.7 s (2%)
329 s (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
30757 Points (76%)
26325 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38088 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14306 Points (60%)
14817 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3373 Points (78%)
2990 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
16817 Points (65%)
15725 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
min: 2848     avg: 2859     median: 2858.5 (91%)     max: 2869 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
min: 16864     avg: 16913     median: 16912.5 (69%)     max: 16961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2507 Points (84%)
2203 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14613 Points (26%)
17880 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2402 Points (10%)
2096 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14698 Points (46%)
17581 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9801 Points (98%)
8861 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
59594 Points (58%)
65241 Points (64%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
383 ms (0%)
452 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
346 Points (90%)
302 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
398 Points (71%)
366 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2174 Points (80%)
2322 Points (85%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
180.2 Watt (31%)
203 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
174.6 Watt (32%)
196.9 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83 Watt (55%)
106.9 Watt (71%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)
112%
1 R9 7900 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9700X → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 105% n=42

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 07. 18:33:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767807194s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:03:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17989 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 17989 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.003s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 15014 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.058s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.063s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)