Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0)
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 29 Bewertungen (aus 45 Tests)
Testberichte für das Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Das Galaxy A25 ist preislich in der Mittelklasse verortet, bietet mit 4 großen Android- und 5 Jahren Sicherheits-Updates aber mehr Software-Support als manches Highend-Smartphone. Auch der verbaute OIS, der sehr helle 120-Hz-Super-AMOLED-Bildschirm sowie die 3,5-mm-Klinke machen das Galaxy-Handy interessant.
Quelle: Chip.de

Das Samsung Galaxy A25 bietet auf 6,5 Zoll ein großes OLED-Display, das im Test mit kräftigen Farben, hoher Schärfe sowie einer geschmeidigen Bildwiederholrate von 120 Hertz punktet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.12.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 88% Leistung: 79% Ausstattung: 88% Bildschirm: 96% Mobilität: 96%
Quelle: Computerbild

Klar, das Samsung A25 ist keine Rakete und auch kein Designwunder. Doch erstmals bietet Samsung auch in der A20er-Serie ein richtig gutes OLED-Display mit ordentlicher Helligkeit. Das Arbeitstempo ist zwar gemächlich, aber durchaus ausreichend – und im Gegensatz zu absoluten Billigmodellen wie dem A05s lässt es sich mit dem A25 gut leben.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: PC Welt

Mit einem Preis von 299 Euro erfüllt das Galaxy A25 5G viele Kriterien, wenn Sie auf der Suche nach einem zuverlässigen Budget-Smartphone sind.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Chinahandys.net

Samsung versucht, den Anschluss an Xiaomi nicht zu verlieren. Das macht man mit einem exzellenten AMOLED-Display, welches aber in Sachen Helligkeit gegenüber der Konkurrenz zurückstecken muss.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: GSM Arena

Galaxy A26 lands with a bigger AMOLED display and the confidence of IP67 water-resistance, while the A25 keeps things lighter on the wallet with the same reliable camera setup—so which feels like the smarter everyday pick?
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.06.2025
Quelle: CNet
EN→DEThe Samsung Galaxy A25 5G offers just enough power that it can handle most of your phone needs, even if it stops short of being able to impress outside of its comparatively long software support timeline. While many phones that cost $300 and less are fortunate to receive more than one software update and three years of security updates, Samsung's commitment to the cheaper phone market means a perfectly good device doesn't have to be discarded after two to three years. However, when you look away from the software support timeline, it's increasingly difficult to ignore some of the additional features and more modern design influences that are showing up on rival budget phones. This includes the colorful vegan leather look Motorola has brought to its Moto G line.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: TechLekh
EN→DEI don’t think that the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a true upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy A24. Instead, it would be better to call this a 5G variant of the Samsung Galaxy A24. The changes are very minimal, yet the price hike is significant. For this reason, I find that the Samsung Galaxy A24 provides better value for money than the Galaxy A25. Since the Galaxy A24 may soon be out of stock, I recommend considering the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G instead. The Galaxy A15 offers similar features to the A24, better gaming performance than the A25, a lower price, includes a charger, and is currently the best phone under Rs. 30,000 in Nepal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.04.2024
Quelle: Android Police
EN→DEIt’s hard to argue that Samsung makes some of the better options when it comes to budget smartphones, so if you’ve got limited funds to work with, we’d definitely recommend checking out the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. The display alone impresses enough to make it worth the mild investment, and the commitment to so many software updates means you won’t be forced to swap it for a new device for a while, adding even more to the value. If you’re coming over from an older flagship, though, the performance issues are going to bother you. The lag is noticeable, although you shouldn’t have any serious problems when it actually matters. Plus, the limited storage options could be frustrating for a heavy user, though considering you can always increase it with a microSD card, that’s far from a deal-breaker.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: PC Mag
EN→DEThe Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a large and bright OLED screen, all-day battery life, good everyday performance, and excellent imaging capabilities for an affordable price. In addition, you won't have to worry about upgrading for several years thanks to Samsung's multi-year software update commitment. As such, the Galaxy A25 handily secures our Editors' Choice award for affordable Android phones. If you're willing to spend more, the $499 Pixel 7a is our Editors' Choice winner for midrange phones thanks to its more durable build, faster hardware, and even better cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Phone Arena
EN→DEShould you buy the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G? In this $300 price class, it offers good value for the money. You get a pretty screen, a substantial upgrade in processor and RAM compared to the cheaper A15 5G, a decent main camera and solid battery life. You can kind of live with this phone. But it's hard to be terribly excited about the Galaxy A25 5G. The design is disappointingly bland and plastic. And while the phone is not terribly slow, it's definitely not fast either. The OnePlus Nord N30, which is much older, still feels zippier than this here Galaxy A25 5G. And for just a bit more, at $350, you can also buy the flashier and more powerful Nothing Phone 2a. But if you want to own a Samsung phone and like the user interface, this is certainly a decent budget phone at a good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.03.2024
Quelle: Android Authority
EN→DEThe Galaxy A25 5G sits right in the middle of Samsung's budget-friendly A series, replacing a Galaxy A24 that never made its way to the United States. It offers a smooth, 6.5-inch AMOLED with a 120Hz refresh rate, an in-house Exynos 1280 chipset, and a triple camera system captained by a 50MP primary sensor. Oh, and it still has a headphone jack!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 13.03.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor
EN→DEAt just under £250/$300, the Galaxy A25 5G ticks a lot of boxes if you’re looking for a reliable budget smartphone. As well as 5G support, you get an excellent 120Hz AMOLED screen, good all-round performance, some good cameras and (perhaps most importantly) better software support than rivals.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.02.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal
EN→DESo all in all, in the process of reviewing the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, I found it to be just about average. Like I said at the beginning, this phone is a slightly better version of the Samsung Galaxy A24 with a better display, 5G connectivity, and a free charger in the box. But, if you are working with a strict budget of around NPR 30,000 then you will not miss out on anything significant by opting for the Samsung Galaxy A24. Even though the Exynos 1280 on the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is better than the Helio G99 on the A24 on paper, it is severely lacking in terms of optimisation. As a result, you won’t find a significant difference in performance. So, getting the Galaxy A24 and saving 7 to 8 thousand of your hard-earned money makes absolute sense too! On the other hand, if have a bit more flexible budget then going for the Samsung Galaxy A34 which comes with an in-display fingerprint sensor, better camera quality, a more premium design, and an IP67 rating is kind of like a no-brainer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A25 is a globally available device and it comes with some notable hardware upgrades over the A24. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.01.2024
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEAll of these small updates pile up and arguably place the Galaxy A25 closer than ever to Galaxy A3X territory regarding features. Other than the upgrades, the Galaxy A25 still offers a solid build, now with a slightly tweaked design, which we found to offer a more comfortable grip. Both the battery life and performance are dependable, and the same can mostly be said about the camera setup. Well, at least in daylight. Low-light photography is a bit of a letdown, though still not bad enough to be a dealbreaker. We would have loved to see a proper ingress protection rating on the Galaxy A25 like its bigger brothers get, but perhaps next year. We really don't see anything major in the Galaxy A25 to complain about. It is a solid Samsung device with all that entails for a reasonable price, and we are sure it will enjoy good popularity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74%
Quelle: Tech X Reviews
EN→DEThe Galaxy A25 steps up the game with its Super AMOLED display and a smoother 120Hz refresh rate, making it a better choice for those who enjoy vibrant colors and fluid scrolling. The Exynos 1280 processor, coupled with 5G capability, positions it as a more future-proof device, offering better performance in gaming and intensive applications. The dual-speaker setup provides an enhanced audio experience. Camera-wise, the A25 offers noticeable improvements, especially in terms of white balance and saturation. So, in conclusion, the comparison between the Samsung Galaxy A15 and Galaxy A25 is a tale of budget versus features. While the A15 offers affordability and reliable performance, the A25 steps up with enhanced features like a superior processor, better display technology, and 5G capability.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.01.2024
Quelle: Tech X Reviews
EN→DEThe Galaxy A25’s design may not appeal to all, as it sports a basic, all-plastic build that lacks a premium feel. The absence of an IP rating for water and dust resistance raises questions about its durability in challenging environments. Moreover, the device’s U-shaped notch design is a step behind the current trend of punch-hole or under-display cameras, which might detract from its aesthetic appeal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.01.2024
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News
EN→DEThe Samsung Galaxy A25 does provide some great value for the money you will pay for. It has 5G connectivity, a flagship-level display, higher brightness, more than a decent chipset, and excellent battery performance. Even the camera is quite good, especially the main camera. Sure there’s no telephoto lens or high-end ultrawide but the superb main camera performance trumps them. Not to mention, it would be impossible to find a smartphone with a telephoto lens at this price in 2023. On top of that, Samsung’s long-term OS support trumps pretty much every other smartphone in this price range and above. No one beats Samsung when it comes to software support in the Android space. Considering all that it offers, the pricing is okay, and vice versa. However, not everyone is a fan of Samsung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.12.2023
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70%
Quelle: 4G News
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android Geek
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 12.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.02.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66% Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 82% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 85% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 70% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Les Numeriques
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 60% Ergonomie: 60%
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 60% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Nerd-mobile
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Orange PL
PL→DEPositive: Stereo speakers; nice display; great cameras; good video recording. Negative: Mediocre design; unsupported waterproof; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.02.2024
Quelle: DGL.ru
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: MobilArena HU
HU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.10.2024
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Viettelstore
VN→DEPositive: Modern design; sharp AMOLED display; high performance; nice cameras; long battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.01.2025
Quelle: Viettelstore
VN→DEPositive: Impressive design; beautiful display; powerful processor; nice cameras; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 11.01.2024
Quelle: Cell Phones
VN→DEPositive: Good cooling system; modern design; excellent display; impressive cameras; powerful hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.01.2024
Quelle: Viettelstore
VN→DEPositive: Premium design; beautiful display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.01.2024
Quelle: FPT shop
VN→DEPositive: Beautiful design; nice display; great performance; long battery life; good cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.12.2023
Quelle: The Gioididong
VN→DEPositive: Premium design; great built quality; nice display; powerful processor; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.12.2023
Quelle: Cell Phones
VN→DEPositive: Excellent display; nice cameras; good price; high performance. Negative: Old design.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.12.2023
Quelle: Komputer for alle
DA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 19.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Komputer for alle
DA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81%
Quelle: Mobil.se
SV→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Mobile-com JP
JA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.04.2025
Bewertung: Leistung: 40% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Kommentar
ARM Mali-G68 MP4: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 4 Kernen / Clustern.
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Exynos 1280: Der Exynos 1280 ist ein Mittelklasse-SoC für Smartphones mit zwei schnellen Cortex-A78 Kernen mit bis zu 2,4 GHz und sechs kleinen A55 Kernen mit bis zu 2 GHz. Er wird in 5nm hergestellt und unterstützt 5G und WifFi 5.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .