Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

Der Intel Core i3-10320 ist ein Einstiegs-Desktop-Prozessor der Comet Lake-S Serie und wurde im 2. Quartal 2020 vorgestellt. Er bietet vier Kerne und acht Threads mit 3,8 - 4,6 GHz Taklung. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i3-10320 weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess.

Performance

In vielen Bereichen kann der kleine i3 mit dem alten Spitzenmodell, dem Core i7-7700K mithalten. Dieser bietet zwar einen etwas geringeren Maximaltakt, aber einen etwas höheren TDP.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i5-10600K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP ist mit 65 Watt (Pl1) spezifiziert und daher für Desktop-CPUs relativ gering. Für 28s kann die CPU auch 90 Watt nutzen (PL2).

Intel Core i3-10100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100F

Der Intel Core i3-10100F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Comet Lake S-Architektur. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,3 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i3-10100F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++). Im Vergleich zum älteren i3-9100F (Comet Lake-S) bietet der 10100F einen 100 MHz höheren Turbo-Takt, Multithreading und Support für schnelleren DDR4-2666 Speicher.

Performance

Die Leistung sollte nur leicht oberhalb des Core i3-9100F im Einstiegsbereich für Desktop-CPUs liegen. Dadurch reicht die Leistung für Office und anspruchsloses Gaming.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-10100F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Core i3-10100F
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
» Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz3600 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200FCLGA1200
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$162 U.S.$122 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i3-10320
Die Size126 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
40.6 pt (48%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (39%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (18%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (54%)
1072 Points (47%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (17%)
3650 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (25%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100F → 82% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 10:01:01

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12774 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#21 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.007s ... 0.026s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 12774 +0s ... 0.026s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#24 got single benchmarks 12774 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.037s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.047s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.052s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.062s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.065s

#65 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.065s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#67 return log +0.004s ... 0.069s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)