Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Core i5-10200H

Intel Core i5-10400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400H

Der Intel Core i5-10400H ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (4. Generation der Skylake Architektur) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,6 - 4,6 GHz (4,4 GHz wenn alle 4 Kerne ausgelastet sind).  Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann wahrscheinlich vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i5-10400H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-10400H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

Der Intel Core i5-10200H ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (4. Generation der Skylake Architektur) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 - 4,1 GHz.  Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-9300H der Vorgängergeneration ist der einzige Unterschied der Support für schnelleren DDR4 Speicher (2933 vs 2666 MHz). Dadurch sollte die Performance nur minimal schneller sein als ein Core i5-9300H

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i5-10200H unterstützt kein vPro, TXT und SIPP, für diese Business Features ist z.B. der Core i5-10400H mit 100-200 MHz höheren Taktfrequenzen geeignet.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-10200H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).

ModelIntel Core i5-10400HIntel Core i5-10200H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Clock2600 - 4600 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i5-10400HIntel Comet Lake i5-10200H

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
40.8 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
38.2 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
5372 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
1089 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
471 Points (61%)
419 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1924 Points (8%)
2082 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
796 Points (8%)
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760Tooltip
842 Points (9%)
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
192 Points (66%)
171.6 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.6 Points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7403 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25731 Points (35%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
801 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4115 Points (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
23136 MIPS (16%)
21148 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4766 MIPS (68%)
4497 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.1 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
191.4 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (13%)
0123456789101112Tooltip
6.5 fps (14%)
0123456789Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (20%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
565 Seconds (4%)
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9578 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
484.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8007 Points (28%)
6233 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10760 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3613 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1245 Points (61%)
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (54%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4332 Points (15%)
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (13%)     max: 4126 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
787 ms (1%)
882 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
187.3 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
67.4 Watt (12%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
99.5 Watt (17%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
75.9 Watt (20%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
4.9 Watt (18%)
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.5 Points per Watt (12%)
77 Points per Watt (89%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 95% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 24. 20:21:32

#0 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.016s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.017s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.018s

#26 got single benchmarks 11958 +0.008s ... 0.026s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.028s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.03s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#37 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0s ... 0.03s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#39 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.012s ... 0.043s

#40 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.045s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.053s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.061s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.067s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.067s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.017s ... 0.085s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.016s ... 0.1s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.105s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.106s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.108s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.11s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.118s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.126s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.133s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.142s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#95 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.149s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#97 return log +0.004s ... 0.154s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)