Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Core i9-10885H

Intel Core i5-10400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400H

Der Intel Core i5-10400H ist ein Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (4. Generation der Skylake Architektur) basiert. Er taktet die vier Prozessorkerne mit 2,6 - 4,6 GHz (4,4 GHz wenn alle 4 Kerne ausgelastet sind).  Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann wahrscheinlich vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i5-10400H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-10400H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

Der Intel Core i9-10885H ist ein Achtkern-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur basiert (CML-H, 4. Generation der Skylake Architektur). Er taktet die acht Prozessorkerne mit 2,4 GHz bis 5,3 GHz oder höher (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo, bis jetzt nicht bestätigt). Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.

Der i9-10885H unterstützt die Businessfeatures vPro, TXT und SIPP.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i9-10885H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks. Optional kann er per Configurable TDP-down auf 35 Watt gedrosselt werden (mit dadurch geringerer Leistung).

ModelIntel Core i5-10400HIntel Core i9-10885H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Clock2600 - 4600 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i5-10400HIntel Comet Lake i9-10885H
$556 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
40.8 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
50.2 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (15%)     max: 10074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (64%)     max: 1295 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
471 Points (61%)
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (63%)     max: 513 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1924 Points (8%)
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (15%)     max: 3762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
796 Points (8%)
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760Tooltip
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (16%)     max: 1726 Points
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
192 Points (66%)
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (72%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.6 Points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7403 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25731 Points (35%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
801 s (9%)
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.9 s (5%)
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4115 Points (24%)
6420 Points (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
23136 MIPS (16%)
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (30%)     max: 42993 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4766 MIPS (68%)
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (80%)     max: 5668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.1 fps (22%)
80.5 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
191.4 fps (52%)
217.8 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (13%)
0123456789101112Tooltip
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (24%)     max: 12.5 fps
05101520Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
1 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (20%)
1.8 GB/s (37%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (20%)
9.9 GB/s (37%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
565 Seconds (4%)
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9578 Points (20%)
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
484.5 s (2%)
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8007 Points (28%)
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (50%)     max: 17242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
31296 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
30997 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (51%)     max: 20606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (44%)     max: 8682 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (65%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (36%)     max: 31904 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (65%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1245 Points (61%)
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (64%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4332 Points (15%)
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (24%)     max: 7693 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
787 ms (1%)
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
58398 Points (60%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (65%)     max: 236 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
67.4 Watt (12%)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
75.9 Watt (20%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (33%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.5 Points per Watt (12%)
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (12%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 140% n=24

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 24. 20:43:08

#0 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.011s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0s ... 0.012s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#26 got single benchmarks 11958 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.021s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#33 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0s ... 0.023s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#35 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.014s ... 0.038s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.046s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.028s ... 0.073s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.092s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.015s ... 0.107s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.108s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.108s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.11s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.112s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.113s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.117s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.118s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.121s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.121s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.133s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.138s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.138s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#150 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.139s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#152 return log +0.004s ... 0.143s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)