Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 6205 vs Intel Celeron 6305

Intel Celeron 6205

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6205

Der Intel Celeron 6205 ist ein sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und im Q3 2020 wahrscheinlich auf den Markt kommt. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Architektur. Der Celeron nutzt wahrscheinlich nur 2 Kerne ohne Hyperthreading und ohne Turbo Boost. Die Taktraten dürften ähnlich wie der Comet Lake-U Celeron 5205U (1,9 GHz, kein Turbo) sein.

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel Xe G1 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte UHD Graphics G1 in Ice Lake bieten soll.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip teilintegriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks.

Achtung, bis jetzt basieren die obigen Informationen noch auf Gerüchte und Leaks, wie über den NUC 11, oder zur GrafikleistungAlle Artikel über Tiger Lake, finden Sie auf unserer Tiger-Lake-Übersichtsseite.

Intel Celeron 6305

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6305

Der Intel Celeron 6305 (oder 6305U) ist ein sparsamer Dual-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und im Q3 2020 auf den Markt kommt. Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Architektur. Der Celeron nutzt nur 2 Kerne ohne Hyperthreading und ohne Turbo Boost. Die Taktraten sind 100 MHz unter dem alten Comet Lake-U Celeron 5205U (1,9 GHz, kein Turbo), dank der Architekturverbesserungen der CPU sollte der 6305 aber schneller sein.

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel Xe G1 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte UHD Graphics G1 in Ice Lake bieten soll.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip teilintegriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. 

ModelIntel Celeron 6205Intel Celeron 6305
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameTiger Lake UTiger Lake U
Serie: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake U
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 63051.8 GHz2 / 24 MB
» Intel Celeron 62052 / 24 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Celeron 63051.8 GHz2 / 24 MB
Intel Celeron 62052 / 24 MB
L1 Cache160 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1499BGA1499
FeaturesWi-Fi 6 (Gig+), Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3733Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3733
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Clock1800 MHz
ManufacturerIntel Tiger Lake Celeron 6305

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron 6305
20.7 pt (24%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1056     avg: 1072     median: 1071.5 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 566     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (28%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
217 Points (28%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
416 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 160.8     avg: 161.1     median: 161.1 (2%)     max: 161.3 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 82.6     avg: 84     median: 84 (29%)     max: 85.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.9 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3465 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6611 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1231 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1210 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 4226     avg: 4263     median: 4262.5 (3%)     max: 4299 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2233     avg: 2238     median: 2237.5 (32%)     max: 2242 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
61.9 fps (17%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.69     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (4%)     max: 1.71 fps
00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.822.22.42.62.82.93.13.33.5Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2824     avg: 2834     median: 2834 (20%)     max: 2844 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
905 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1723     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (7%)     max: 2148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19614     avg: 19990     median: 19990 (17%)     max: 20366 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1619     avg: 1639     median: 1638.5 (4%)     max: 1658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2368     avg: 2391     median: 2390.5 (6%)     max: 2413 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 632     avg: 638     median: 638 (31%)     max: 644 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1154     avg: 1198     median: 1198 (4%)     max: 1242 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 626     avg: 629     median: 628.5 (32%)     max: 631 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1151     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (4%)     max: 1216 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2776     avg: 2825     median: 2824.5 (33%)     max: 2873 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4762     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (6%)     max: 5137 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1678     avg: 1681     median: 1681 (2%)     max: 1684 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
326.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
21416 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 99.2     avg: 100.7     median: 100.7 (27%)     max: 102.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 501     avg: 508     median: 507.5 (22%)     max: 514 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.1 Watt (2%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.5 Watt (3%)
012345678910111213Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.8 Watt (20%)
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
6.6 Watt (21%)
0123456789101112Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
15.4 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 6305 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 11. 16:34:04

#0 checking url part for id 12246 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12244 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12246 +0s ... 0.009s

#13 got single benchmarks 12246 +0s ... 0.009s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 12244 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#17 got single benchmarks 12244 +0.009s ... 0.024s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.032s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.026s ... 0.063s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.064s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.067s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.082s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.088s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.092s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.096s

#88 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.097s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#90 return log +0.004s ... 0.101s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)