Der Mini-UMTS-Tablet-PC
Quelle: Notebook / Organizer / Handy Archive.org version
Plus: Nur 1030 Gramm schwer; Sehr kompakte Bauweise; Aktueller ULV-Prozessor; Als Tablet-PC einsetzbar. Minus: Konzeptbedingt kleine Tasten.
Test ist nur in der Zeitschrift gedruckt

Ergonomie mangelhaft
Einzeltest, online nicht verfügbar, Länge unbekannt, Datum: 20.04.2007
Bewertung: Ergonomie: 50%

75% Fujitsu-Siemens LifeBook P1610
Quelle: Bios Magazine EN→DE Archive.org version
Computers powered by the Windows XP Tablet PC Edition operating system, and equipped with a sensitive screen designed to interact with a complementary pen, are called Tablet PCs. Tablet PCs are fully-functional laptop PCs, but with the added benefit of being able to use a stylus/pen directly on the screen just as you would a mouse to do things like select, drag, and open files; or in place of a keyboard to handwrite notes and communication. Unlike a touch screen, the Tablet PC screen only receives information from this special pen. It will not take information from your finger or your shirt sleeve - so you can rest your wrist on the screen and write naturally. Your business doesn’t live in an office - it goes wherever you go. And with the LifeBook P1610 you have simple ways to connect, communicate, network, and get it done - whether you’re in the office or on the road.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

7.5 von 10, Ausstattung mäßig, Verarbeitung exzellent
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.07.2007
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Ausstattung: 60% Gehäuse: 95%

80% Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook P1610
Quelle: Reg Hardware EN→DE Archive.org version
While the P1610 isn't going to win any performance awards, it's up to the job of everyday tasks. What it lacks in power it easily compensates for in portability. The keyboard is a little on the small side, but other than that it's a very usable machine. The tiny size comes at a premium, but when judged against other similar systems it's reasonably priced. It's a machine you really could take with you everywhere and still be able to get something done once you arrive.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

80%, Preis/Leistung zufriedenstellend, Leistung mäßig
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.05.2007
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 60%

60% A truly portable tablet PC, but one that's dogged by poor battery life
Quelle: vnunet.com EN→DE Archive.org version
With Windows Vista now housing full tablet functionality, Microsoft must be hoping for a boost in sales of the much maligned tablet PC. Pros: Very light; small chassis; good features; Cons: Poor battery life; low-spec components; expensive; Overall: It will appeal to those after a portable tablet PC, but battery life is poor and you pay a hefty premium for its small dimensions
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

(von 5): 3, Preis/Leistung 2, Ausstattung 3, Ergonomie 3, Mobilität mangelhaft
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.03.2007
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 40% Ausstattung: 60% Mobilität: 50% Ergonomie: 60%

70% Can Fujitsu Siemens make the Tablet PC useful?
Quelle: Pocket Lint EN→DE Archive.org version
Tablet PC has never really caught the imagination of the average computer user. It’s great for business, where the interactive screen can be shared by a couple of people for writing notes. The Fujitsu Siemens P1610 is great to use and its light weight means you aren’t tied down to carrying a brick around with you. However, its battery life really lets the useability side down. It may be great to use in meetings but we’d recommend using at a secondary machine and not as your sole notebook.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

7 von 10, Mobilität mäßig
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.02.2007
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Mobilität: 60%

This ultra ultraportable features a swiveling, tablet-style screen.
Quelle: PC World EN→DE Archive.org version
The Fujitsu LifeBook P1610 is a well-designed, extremely compact, and flexible notebook. Anyone who roams around a lot during the workday and needs continual access to a computer is an ideal candidate--particularly if price isn't a big concern. If you frequently spend some of your work day outside (for legitimate reasons--or not), you'd probably find this little computer invaluable, too. Otherwise, a full-featured ultraportable, such as Fujitsu's LifeBook P7120 or Sony's Vaio TX series, is probably a better bet.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

Preis/Leistung teuer, Ausstattung gut, Akkulaufzeit zufriedenstellend
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.02.2007
Bewertung: Preis: 40% Ausstattung: 80%

LifeBook P1610 Tablet PC (1.20GHz Core Solo U1400, 1GB, 80GB, Windows XP Pro, 8.9)
Quelle: PC World EN→DE Archive.org version
This attractive ultraportable model packs a lot of functionality--including a swiveling touch screen--into a tight space. Pick up the svelte Fujitsu LifeBook P1610, and you'll barely feel as if you're carrying a notebook PC. And no wonder: At 2.2 pounds, the $2419 (as of 12/18/06) P1610 puts the "ultra" in ultraportable. The P1610 is similar in weight and size to its predecessor, the LifeBook P1510. (It's slightly slimmer at 1.4 inches deep, and it measures 9.1 by 6.6 inches.) Included, however, are several notable improvements, among them a reasonably roomy 80GB hard drive, and a PC Card slot in lieu of the P1510's integrated CompactFlash slot.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.01.2007

57% Fujitsu LifeBook P1610 (Core Solo 1.2GHz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HDD)
Quelle: CNet EN→DE Archive.org version
The Fujitsu LifeBook P1610 combines the best features of ultramobile PCs (tiny size, easy-to-use touch screen) and convertible tablets (an attached keyboard, laptop-caliber performance). As with most hybrid technologies, however, the LifeBook P1610 forces you to make some compromises: its tiny keyboard makes extensive typing a challenge, and--though we'd like to carry the P1610 with us all day long--its battery life isn't enough to last through a full day of work.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar

(von 10): 5.7, Leistung 5, Ausstattung 7, Akkulaufzeit 4, Preis/Leistung teuer
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.12.2006
Bewertung: Gesamt: 57% Preis: 40% Leistung: 50% Ausstattung: 70%