Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T830 MP1 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP2

ARM Mali-T830 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP1

Die ARM Mali-T830 MP1 ist eine integrierte Grafikeinheit für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Neben OpenGL ES 3.2 beherrscht die GPU auch OpenCL 1.2 sowie DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). Die MP1-Version bietet nur einen Cluster an Recheneinheiten und ist die langsamste T830 Variante.

ARM Mali-T880 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP2

Die ARM Mali-T880 MP2 ist eine integrierte Grafikeinheit z.B. im Mediatek Helio P20 SoC für Android Smartphones. Neben OpenGL ES 3.1 beherrscht die GPU auch OpenCL 1.2 sowie DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). Je nach Bedarf kann die Mali-T880 von 1 bis 16 Kerne/Cluster skaliert werden. In diesem Fall werden 2 Cluster verbaut.

show full text
ARM Mali-T830 MP1ARM Mali-T880 MP2
Mali-T800 Serie
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
iGPUIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Pipelines1 - unified2 - unified
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1
Herstellungsprozess16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
Erscheinungsdatum01.04.2016 26.11.2015
Herstellerseitewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)
ArchitekturMidgard (4rd-gen)
Kerntakt900 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Mali-T830 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-T880 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P258 x 2600 MHz1000 MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT67578 x 2300 MHz900 MHz? MHz
min. - max.900 - 1000 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
8002 Points (1%)
min: 10498     avg: 11431     median: 11898 (1%)     max: 11898 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 5376     avg: 7092     median: 7470 (1%)     max: 7793 Points
min: 10023     avg: 13267     median: 13844 (1%)     max: 14288 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
4548 Points (1%)
min: 6839     avg: 8665     median: 9269 (1%)     max: 9283 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 464     avg: 474.8     median: 473.5 (2%)     max: 488 Points
min: 826     avg: 976     median: 991.5 (4%)     max: 1069 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 385     avg: 394.2     median: 393 (1%)     max: 405 Points
min: 767     avg: 882     median: 893.5 (2%)     max: 978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 291     avg: 300.6     median: 303 (1%)     max: 307 Points
min: 626     avg: 720     median: 717 (3%)     max: 795 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 236     avg: 243.4     median: 245 (1%)     max: 248 Points
min: 556     avg: 620     median: 633 (2%)     max: 647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 301     avg: 402     median: 404 (4%)     max: 490 Points
min: 708     avg: 957     median: 988.5 (9%)     max: 1058 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 244     avg: 331.4     median: 333 (2%)     max: 407 Points
min: 639     avg: 862     median: 907 (5%)     max: 938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 231     avg: 273.5     median: 276 (1%)     max: 312 Points
min: 631     avg: 699     median: 700.5 (3%)     max: 759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 185     avg: 220.8     median: 223 (1%)     max: 253 Points
min: 559     avg: 606     median: 606.5 (2%)     max: 649 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
0.6 fps (0%)
1.5 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 8     median: 8 (1%)     max: 14.2 fps
4.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (0%)     max: 2 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 4     median: 4.1 (0%)     max: 4.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 1.7     avg: 3     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
min: 3.4     avg: 6     median: 6.8 (0%)     max: 6.9 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 4.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (0%)     max: 5.4 fps
min: 9.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (0%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP1
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
12 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2
min: 21     avg: 23.1     median: 24 (0%)     max: 24 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 9655     avg: 9936     median: 9935.5 (23%)     max: 10216 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 18345     avg: 19359     median: 19359 (43%)     max: 20373 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
2.7 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3868     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (1%)     max: 4072 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1046     avg: 1086     median: 1085.5 (1%)     max: 1125 Points
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

ARM Mali-T830 MP1 → 100% n=17

ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 214% n=17

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
med.
100%
Mali-T830 MP1:
10 13 ~ 12 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
ultra
100%
Mali-T830 MP1:
26  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP1:
30 30 30 35 52 60 ~ 40 fps
115%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 52 57 ~ 46 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T830 MP1:
29 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP1:
18 22 23 28 30 ~ 24 fps
125%
Mali-T880 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP1:
59  fps
88%
Mali-T880 MP2:
52  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP1 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 107%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

ARM Mali-T830 MP1ARM Mali-T880 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile12
Arena of Valor26
Dead Trigger 24046
Asphalt 8: Airborne30243030
Temple Run 25952
ARM Mali-T830 MP1ARM Mali-T880 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1

1


1
2

1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





3










Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 11. 03:48:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7718 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7720 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773197299s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:47:34 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7718 +0.015s ... 0.025s

#9 got single benchmarks 7718 +0.007s ... 0.032s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7720 +0s ... 0.033s

#11 got single benchmarks 7720 +0.009s ... 0.042s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.058s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.058s

#15 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.061s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.061s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.061s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.063s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.063s

#20 return log +0.124s ... 0.187s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks & Tech > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)