Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove from comparison Intel P8400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8400 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Der P8400 ist sehr ähnlich zu der OEM Version Core 2 Duo P7550, welcher später auf den Markt kam.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P8400 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

► remove from comparison Intel P9500

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor wurde später vom 2.63 GHz schnellen P9600 zum selben Startpreis abgelöst, welcher ebenfalls nur 25 Watt braucht. 

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9500 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P8400Intel Core 2 Duo P9500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2530 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.1545 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket PBGA479, PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$209 U.S.$348 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P8400Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2418     avg: 2527     median: 2497 (22%)     max: 2882 Points
min: 2758     avg: 2944     median: 2901 (26%)     max: 3234 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4507     avg: 4701     median: 4630 (6%)     max: 5314 Points
min: 5245     avg: 5607     median: 5501.5 (8%)     max: 6104 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
34.2 s (7%)
30.5 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (4%)     max: 2084 Points
min: 1687     avg: 2198     median: 2311 (5%)     max: 2350 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 21.75     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (5%)     max: 22.71 s
min: 17.67     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.31 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 50.7     avg: 51.5     median: 51.8 (2%)     max: 52.2 s
min: 42.49     avg: 43.2     median: 43.2 (2%)     max: 43.91 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1212 s (5%)
1101 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
21204 MIPS (10%)
23667 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
17820 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3410     avg: 5117     median: 5201.5 (33%)     max: 6255 Points
min: 4598     avg: 6203     median: 6250 (39%)     max: 7387 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.2 Points (74%)
5.4 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (4%)     max: 4475 Points
min: 5060     avg: 5142     median: 5157 (5%)     max: 5210 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 110% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 12:59:01

#0 checking url part for id 398 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 398 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 398 +0.039s ... 0.046s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0s ... 0.047s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#51 got single benchmarks 405 +0.015s ... 0.063s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#166 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.073s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#168 return log +0.004s ... 0.077s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)