Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-9100F vs DK3.5+ST vs unknown

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

Der Intel Core i3-9100F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,2 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i3-9100F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i3-8100 konnte die Leistung etwas gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um 10 bis 15 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit auf kleine Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-9100F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i3-9100 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

DK3.5+ST

► remove from comparison

unknown

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core i3-9100FDK3.5+STunknown
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeHuawei
CodenameCoffee Lake-R
Serie:
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « 2 cores
unknown cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown «  cores
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42
TDP65 Watt
Technology14 nm
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
$122 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
28 pt (46%)
AMD E1-2100
2.33 -92%
...
Intel Core i5-1035G1
27.3 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
27.4 -2%
Intel Core i5-8365U
27.4 -2%
Intel Core i5-1035G7
27.5 -2%
Intel Core i5-1130G7
27.6 -1%
Intel Core i5-10310U
27.6 -1%
Intel Core i5-1140G7
27.7 -1%
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
27.9 0%
Intel Core i7-8809G
27.9 0%
Intel Core i3-9100F
28
Intel Core i5-1230U
28.2 1%
Intel Core i7-1065G7
28.3 1%
Intel Core i5-10200H
28.4 1%
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
28.4 1%
Intel Core i5-9300H
28.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
28.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
28.5 2%
Intel Core i7-10810U
28.5 2%
Intel Core i7-8665U
28.5 2%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.3 115%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (4%)
164%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
345.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (57%)
37732 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
142%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (18%)
119%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (16%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (43%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
8.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 31. 23:46:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730414795s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:16:23 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#9 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.004s ... 0.039s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.001s ... 0.039s

#11 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0s ... 0.043s

#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.091s ... 0.134s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.155s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.155s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)