Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo L7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom-2M Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Die Virtualisierungsfunktionen des Merom Kerns sind jedoch beim T5500 deaktiviert. Durch die geringe Taktrate, den relativ kleinen Cache und den langsamen FSB ist die Performance des T5500 limitiert und war auch in 2008 nur in der Einsteigerklasse anzusiedeln. Im Vergleich zu Pentium und Celeron Modellen, sollte der Core 2 Duo jedoch mehr Stromsparmechanismen bieten.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

► remove from comparison Intel T7500

Der Core 2 Duo T7500 ist ein Mittelklasse Core 2 Duo Prozessor (zur Zeit des Erscheinens sogar knapp High-End) der Merom basierenden Notebook Prozessoren. Dank 4 MB Level 2 Cache und 2.2 GHz zeigte er eine gute Anwendungs- und Spieleperformance. 

Im Vergleich zu später veröffentlichten Prozessoren, positioniert sich der T7500 auf Höhe eines Core 2 Duo P7570 oder Turion II Ultra M640-M660 in der Mittelklasse ein. Spätere Core 2 Duo Prozessoren (Penryn) unterstützen jedoch einige Features mehr und sind daher etwas schneller und stomsparender.

Intel Core 2 Duo L7500

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T7500Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz2200 MHz1600 MHz
FSB667800800
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V65 nm, 1.075 - 1.250V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$234 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1656     avg: 1717.3     median: 1660 (10%)     max: 1836 Points
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (14%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3026     avg: 3190.3     median: 3069 (2%)     max: 3476 Points
min: 4182     avg: 4283.9     median: 4272.5 (3%)     max: 4473 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37.5     avg: 37.5     median: 37.5 (110%)     max: 34 s
min: 68.2     avg: 68.2     median: 68.2 (201%)     max: 34 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1339     avg: 1387.3     median: 1392 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1878.5     median: 1906 (4%)     max: 1940 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (133%)     max: 24.58 s
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (93%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 83     avg: 83     median: 83 (170%)     max: 48.81 s
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.7 (112%)     max: 48.81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1923     avg: 1923     median: 1923 (178%)     max: 1081 s
min: 1344     avg: 1344     median: 1344 (124%)     max: 1081 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2916     avg: 3353     median: 3323 (7%)     max: 3992 Points
min: 2095     avg: 4544.7     median: 4629 (10%)     max: 5785 Points
3356 Points (7%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 37.5>34 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.269s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 68.2>34 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.271s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 204> for benchmark 9, setting:2276 +0s ... 0.277s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 34>24.58 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.279s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 83>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.282s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 55.3>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.283s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1923>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.285s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1344>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.286s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 19840> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.288s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 20177> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.289s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 10367> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.29s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 13946> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.291s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 532> for benchmark 12, setting:2279 +0s ... 0.292s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5787> for benchmark 15, setting:18 +0s ... 0.294s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5984> for benchmark 15, setting:18 +0s ... 0.296s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.1> for benchmark 20, setting:114 +0s ... 0.303s

log 16. 05:39:52

#0 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 343 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:39:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0.002s ... 0.024s

#8 got single benchmarks 174 +0.084s ... 0.108s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.002s ... 0.11s

#10 got single benchmarks 322 +0.129s ... 0.239s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 343 +0.003s ... 0.241s

#12 got single benchmarks 343 +0.015s ... 0.256s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.256s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.258s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.261s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.264s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.266s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.268s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.269s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.271s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.272s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.276s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.277s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.279s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.28s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.282s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.283s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.285s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.286s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.288s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.289s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.29s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.291s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.292s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.294s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.296s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.297s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.301s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.302s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.303s

#41 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.303s

#42 return log +0s ... 0.303s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)