Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen. Der später erschienenen T7250 bietet nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache dafür jedoch einen schnelleren FSB. Trotzdem sollte er im Schnitt langsamer sein.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo T7700 war der schnellste Merom basierte Core 2 Duo mit 35 Watt TDP. Die Penryn Nachfolger (z.B. Core 2 Duo T8300) waren bei gleichem Takt minimal schneller.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2400 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm1.0375V-1.300V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.$307 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (23%)     max: 2598 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (6%)     max: 4665 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
1266 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
22156 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 Points (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 Points (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 116% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 00:22:45

#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#42 got single benchmarks 168 +0.041s ... 0.049s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0s ... 0.049s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#45 got single benchmarks 323 +0.024s ... 0.073s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#120 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.083s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.021s ... 0.104s

#122 return log +0.004s ... 0.108s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)