Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs Mediatek MT8766B

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison  Helio MT8766B

Der MediaTek MT8766B Helio A20 ist eine ARM-SoC für günstige Android-Smartphones und -tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das SoC besitzt 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz Takt und ähnelt daher dem Helios A20 (1.8 GHz).

Als Grafikchip kommt ein PowerVR GE8300 zum Einsatz (max. 1600x720 Pixel), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3/LPDDR4X.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G mit bis zu 150 Mbps Download (Cat-4) und 75 Mbps Upload (Cat-5). Bluetooth 5.0 (?) und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der A20 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahrens produziert.

ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TMediatek MT8766B
Series Mediatek Mediatek MT8
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek MT8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2300 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 Decode
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)PowerVR GE8300
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13779 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
853 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
860 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (7%)     max: 172 Points
133 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
455 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
2217 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
741 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
2043 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
11505 ms (13%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1609 ms (18%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (5%)     max: 5156 Points
3920 Points (4%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (7%)
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
15424 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
24878 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
4722 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
30304 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
75328 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (24%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
4808 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2761 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6844 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
6431 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 81% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 19:00:57

#0 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.014s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.011s ... 0.045s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.009s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.009s ... 0.063s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.094s ... 0.157s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.159s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.162s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.164s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.191s

#16 return log +0.036s ... 0.227s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)