Intel Core i9-12950HX vs Intel Core i9-12900HK
Intel Core i9-12950HX ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12950HX ist eine High-End-Notebook-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-S Desktop-Chip und bietet alle 8 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 24 Threads) und takten von 2,3 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,7 - 3,6 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Im Unterschied zum i9-12900HX, bietet der 12950HX Intel vPro Managment Features und ECC Speicher (Nachfolger der Xeon Linie). Die Übertaktungsoptionen sind jedoch etwas begrenzt.
Performance
Durch die zwei zusätzlichen P-Kerne und den höheren TDP sollte der i9-12950HX deutlich schneller sein als der i9-12900HK . Dadurch eignet sich die CPU hervorragend für anspruchsvolle Anwendungen und Spiele.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12950HX sind alle 32 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,55 GHz. Der schwächere 12900HK Mobilchip bietet 96 EUs.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800 und DDR4-3200. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt 48 PCIe Lanes, davon 16 PCIe 5.0 (x16 oder 2 x8).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12950HX ist mit 55 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 157 Watt). Gefertigt wird der 12900HX im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Model Intel Core i9-12950HX Intel Core i9-12900HK Series Intel Alder Lake-S Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Alder Lake-HX Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 1700 - 5000 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 1.4 MB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 14 MB 11.5 MB L3 Cache 30 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 16 / 24 8 x 5.0 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core 8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core 14 / 20 TDP 55 Watt 45 Watt Technology 10 nm 10 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1964 BGA1744 Features DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (with ECC supp.), PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12950HX
46.6 pt (65%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
44.8 pt (62%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (76%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 92% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 85%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16277 avg: 19930 median: 20263 (19%) max: 23113 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 93% 92% 88% 75% 94%
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 82% 77% 100% 66% 98% 94% 80% 100% 89% 90% 93% 93%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1465 avg: 1835 median: 1885 (80%) max: 1922 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 99% 98% 99% 100% 76% 98%
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 81% 97% 97% 82% 98% 99% 76% 97% 100% 98% 86% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 703 avg: 727 median: 727 (81%) max: 741 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 98% 98% 100% 100% 95% 98%
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 86% 98% 98% 82% 100% 100% 95% 98% 92% 99% 80% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6625 avg: 7689 median: 7744 (19%) max: 8777 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 96% 90% 89% 80% 93%
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 80% 75% 100% 65% 94% 92% 83% 97% 87% 86% 90% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2464 avg: 3090 median: 3107 (20%) max: 3530 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 94% 100% 88% 70% 79% 89%
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 70% 70% 100% 56% 88% 70% 79% 89% 79% 83% 81% 83%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 167 avg: 257.4 median: 274 (83%) max: 276 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 100% 100% 61% 97% 100%
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (81%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 85% 96% 98% 81% 98% 60% 95% 98% 100% 99% 86% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 83% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (81%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 99% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 87% 85% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (52%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 81%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (2%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100%
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 91% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 65637 avg: 77515 median: 77003 (44%) max: 85019 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 87% 91% 90% 77% 95%
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 84% 78% 92% 70% 96% 96% 82% 100% 85% 91% 92% 86%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6022 avg: 6174 median: 6197 (74%) max: 6318 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 99% 100% 97% 96% 98%
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (69%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 86% 97% 99% 85% 100% 97% 96% 99% 99% 98% 84% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (44%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 87% 95%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6 avg: 22.3 median: 22.5 (40%) max: 26.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 84% 89% 78% 74% 93%
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 81% 74% 91% 67% 96% 83% 79% 100% 77% 85% 87% 91%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (0%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 80% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 85% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 80% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273 avg: 307.8 median: 302 (4%) max: 337 Seconds
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 101%
413 Seconds (5%)
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 101% 102% 101% 101% 102%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 138 avg: 171.4 median: 175 (1%) max: 193 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (1%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100% 100% 100%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4251 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4515 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 100% 101% 100% 100% 100%
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 102% 102% 101% 103% 103% 102% 102% 103% 103% 101% 103%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 86% 78% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (2%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (2%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (53%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20830 avg: 22817 median: 23129 (63%) max: 23711 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 97% 98% 88% 98%
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (60%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 85% 95% 70% 93% 94% 84% 93% 98% 94% 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
99481 Points (81%)
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 97% 100% 66% 72%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 67% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (75%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 100% 74% 92% 81%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20257 avg: 21525 median: 21525 (54%) max: 22793 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 82 W 100% 89%
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 83% 100% 71% 89% 85% 88% 78% 93%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28197 avg: 30872 median: 30270 (54%) max: 34733 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 86% 87% 81% 90%
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 65% 77% 100% 67% 86% 87% 81% 90% 84% 89% 76% 87%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12049 avg: 13302 median: 13303 (56%) max: 14615 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 93% 91% 82% 89%
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 67% 81% 100% 65% 93% 91% 82% 89% 88% 95% 80% 98%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2611 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1847 avg: 1891 median: 1886 (80%) max: 1945 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 95% 97% 96% 100% 98% 99%
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (79%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 83% 96% 97% 96% 100% 98% 99% 96% 99% 82% 97%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14028 avg: 15046 median: 15229 (27%) max: 16009 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 99% 97% 90% 91% 98%
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 78% 78% 100% 98% 91% 92% 98% 90% 88% 81% 89%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1798 avg: 1845 median: 1855 (8%) max: 1881 Points
CPU TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 96% 99%
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 95% 100% 96% 99% 99% 98%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13575 avg: 14070 median: 13908 (44%) max: 14728 Points
CPU TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 94% 92% 100%
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 70% 94% 92% 100% 93% 92%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 99% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (55%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 77% 98% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 498 avg: 502 median: 502 (1%) max: 506 ms
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (1%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (1%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94008 Points (85%)
94352 Points (85%)
CPU TDP 70 W TDP 86 W 100% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 272 avg: 276.2 median: 274 (79%) max: 286 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 96% 100% 96% 95% 96%
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (74%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 94% 96% 87% 100% 96% 95% 96%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 298 avg: 310.4 median: 311 (65%) max: 324 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 92% 100% 94% 96% 97%
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (63%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 44% 95% 90% 86% 98% 92% 94% 95% 100% 95% 87% 90%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (95%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1801 avg: 1930 median: 1889 (72%) max: 2112 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 93% 100% 89% 85% 89%
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 94% 93% 85% 100% 89% 85% 89% 100% 82% 90%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 106.4 avg: 133.5 median: 128.7 (22%) max: 165.7 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 114% 109% 106% 109% 100%
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 122% 117% 122% 112% 109% 111% 102% 112% 115% 113% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 150 avg: 173.6 median: 172.2 (31%) max: 198.5 Watt
CPU TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 114% 100% 108%
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 128% 135% 114% 100% 108% 116% 118% 109% 109%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.2 avg: 19 median: 19.6 (13%) max: 25.7 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 100% 104% 106% 112%
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 156% 142% 100% 148% 151% 159%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9.54 avg: 17 median: 18.2 (20%) max: 22.2 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 109% 100% 103% 119%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.9 avg: 15.9 median: 15.7 (12%) max: 18.2 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W 86% 76% 100%
min: 17.2 avg: 20.3 median: 19.4 (14%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 71 W TDP 76 W TDP 82 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 99% 100% 62% 55% 72% 76% 85% 68% 69%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12950HX → 100% n=26 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 95% n=26
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 17. 10:17:25
#0 checking url part for id 14403 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:39:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14403 +0.021s ... 0.044s
#7 got single benchmarks 14403 +0.03s ... 0.073s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.017s ... 0.09s
#9 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.041s ... 0.131s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.373s ... 0.504s
#12 return log +0.035s ... 0.539s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)