Xiaomi Redmi Pad Serie
Prozessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G99, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 680Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G57 MP2, Qualcomm Adreno 610
Bildschirm: 10.61 Zoll, 11.00 Zoll
Gewicht: 0.445kg, 0.481kg
Preis: 199.9, 330 Euro
Durchschnitt von 96 Bewertungen (aus 164 Tests)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Xiaomi Redmi PadProzessor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G99
Grafikkarte: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Bildschirm: 10.61 Zoll, 5:3, 2000 x 1200 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.445kg
Preis: 330 Euro
Links:
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Mit dem Redmi Pad stellt Xiaomi sein erstes Tablet aus der Redmi-Serie vor. Das bedeutet, dass beim 10,6-Zöller ein niedriger Preis und eine gute Ausstattung zum Pflichtprogramm gehören. Im Test legt das Redmi Tab mit Features wie einem 90-Hz-Display, einem schicken Metallgehäuse und langen Akkulaufzeiten ordentlich vor, offenbart aber auch ein paar Schwächen.
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
Personally, I think that Redmi Pad is a very balanced and organic device. It has a classic design, a good screen, high battery life, and good cameras. It doesn’t have any incredible exceptional features, but it doesn’t have a single failure or significant drawback. It is a very marketable product that aims to satisfy all the needs of a middle-class user. The difficulty is how to stand out from the competition in such circumstances, but for some reason you have read this far. In short, this tablet is definitely worth a look as a purchase option for the most utilitarian tasks.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
Personally, I think that Redmi Pad is a very balanced and organic device. It has a classic design, a good screen, high battery life, and good cameras. It doesn’t have any incredible exceptional features, but it doesn’t have a single failure or significant drawback. It is a very marketable product that aims to satisfy all the needs of a middle-class user. The difficulty is how to stand out from the competition in such circumstances, but for some reason you have read this far. In short, this tablet is definitely worth a look as a purchase option for the most utilitarian tasks.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 90% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Redmi Tab seems like a well-thought project that materialised the way Xiaomi wanted it to. It not only impressed the first-time users in our office and home but also left a good impression on us. While the competition is tough in this price segment, the Redmi Pad has all the necessary ingredients and support of some nifty features to easily impress potential buyers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE
Redmi Tab seems like a well-thought project that materialised the way Xiaomi wanted it to. It not only impressed the first-time users in our office and home but also left a good impression on us. While the competition is tough in this price segment, the Redmi Pad has all the necessary ingredients and support of some nifty features to easily impress potential buyers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
Despite this, the Redmi Pad also has a lot of advantages - it offers quite good performance for tablet applications, and above all, it does not get hot. In addition, it has good 4 speakers and a not bad battery, takes decent photos and looks really beautiful. The whole thing together is really digestible, but once again I will repeat - rather to use at home. As a device that we grab from time to time to read or watch a video, this tablet is the most noteworthy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.11.2022
Quelle: GSM Choice EN→DE
Despite this, the Redmi Pad also has a lot of advantages - it offers quite good performance for tablet applications, and above all, it does not get hot. In addition, it has good 4 speakers and a not bad battery, takes decent photos and looks really beautiful. The whole thing together is really digestible, but once again I will repeat - rather to use at home. As a device that we grab from time to time to read or watch a video, this tablet is the most noteworthy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.11.2022
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE
The Redmi Pad is the longest-lasting Android device we’ve tested in the last year. The measured battery life is 16 hours, and the continuous playback of 1080P video at station B can last for 18 hours. This figure is roughly 1.5 times that of today’s mainstream mobile phones. In the case of medium and heavy use, it can basically be charged every 2 days. The charging performance is relatively average, and it takes 135 minutes to charge from 0 to 100%. However, considering its long battery life, even if it is used under high load, the number of charging times per week is not much. 10.6-inch 90Hz high-refresh screen, 6+2GB memory, 128GB UFS 2.2 flash memory, 8000mAh large-capacity battery, and 4 speakers. As an entry-level tablet, Redmi Pad has almost no obvious shortcomings in configuration.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.11.2022
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE
The Redmi Pad is the longest-lasting Android device we’ve tested in the last year. The measured battery life is 16 hours, and the continuous playback of 1080P video at station B can last for 18 hours. This figure is roughly 1.5 times that of today’s mainstream mobile phones. In the case of medium and heavy use, it can basically be charged every 2 days. The charging performance is relatively average, and it takes 135 minutes to charge from 0 to 100%. However, considering its long battery life, even if it is used under high load, the number of charging times per week is not much. 10.6-inch 90Hz high-refresh screen, 6+2GB memory, 128GB UFS 2.2 flash memory, 8000mAh large-capacity battery, and 4 speakers. As an entry-level tablet, Redmi Pad has almost no obvious shortcomings in configuration.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.11.2022
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Wrapping up this review, Xiaomi has clearly scored another winner with its latest budget tablet. The company has struck a fine balance between affordability, usability, and features, making the Redmi Pad the best budget tablet in the market right now. Other than the software limitations on the base variant and a few other minor drawbacks, this is an excellent budget tablet. And the one to beat for other new newcomers. Redmi has scored a winner with its first attempt at a budget Android tablet. It has struck a fine balance between affordability, usability, and features with the Redmi Pad, making it the best budget tablet in the market right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 90% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→DE
Wrapping up this review, Xiaomi has clearly scored another winner with its latest budget tablet. The company has struck a fine balance between affordability, usability, and features, making the Redmi Pad the best budget tablet in the market right now. Other than the software limitations on the base variant and a few other minor drawbacks, this is an excellent budget tablet. And the one to beat for other new newcomers. Redmi has scored a winner with its first attempt at a budget Android tablet. It has struck a fine balance between affordability, usability, and features with the Redmi Pad, making it the best budget tablet in the market right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 07.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 90% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
The Redmi Pad has the makings of a decent tablet for entertainment. It has a premium design, a nice screen, immersive speakers, and a big battery. It is competitively priced too at PHP 13,999 for the 4GB + 128GB, and PHP 14,999 for the 6GB + 128GB. It’s positioned better compared to its competitors from other brands. However, it’s priced too close to its cousin the Xiaomi Pad 5. The 6GB + 128GB is now priced at PHP 15,999 and has a better display with a higher refresh rate, a more powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset, faster UFS 3.1 storage, a better camera, and an even bigger battery with faster charging. In this case, I’d recommend just bumping the budget a bit for this one so you can get more hardware for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.10.2022
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE
The Redmi Pad has the makings of a decent tablet for entertainment. It has a premium design, a nice screen, immersive speakers, and a big battery. It is competitively priced too at PHP 13,999 for the 4GB + 128GB, and PHP 14,999 for the 6GB + 128GB. It’s positioned better compared to its competitors from other brands. However, it’s priced too close to its cousin the Xiaomi Pad 5. The 6GB + 128GB is now priced at PHP 15,999 and has a better display with a higher refresh rate, a more powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset, faster UFS 3.1 storage, a better camera, and an even bigger battery with faster charging. In this case, I’d recommend just bumping the budget a bit for this one so you can get more hardware for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 31.10.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Redmi Pad, with all its hardware and software features, is certainly my obvious recommendation for anyone looking to buy an Android tablet under Rs. 20,000. With a capable performance unit, a big battery and a large screen, the Redmi Pad is suitable for a majority of use cases, including gaming. I would recommend buying the 4GB RAM variant or possibly even the 6GB RAM variant. You not only get more storage but also the assurance of a smoother user experience. Some of the key MIUI 13 for Pad features such as split screen, floating windows, multi-window, etc, are not available on the 3GB RAM variant, so it makes sense to skip it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Redmi Pad, with all its hardware and software features, is certainly my obvious recommendation for anyone looking to buy an Android tablet under Rs. 20,000. With a capable performance unit, a big battery and a large screen, the Redmi Pad is suitable for a majority of use cases, including gaming. I would recommend buying the 4GB RAM variant or possibly even the 6GB RAM variant. You not only get more storage but also the assurance of a smoother user experience. Some of the key MIUI 13 for Pad features such as split screen, floating windows, multi-window, etc, are not available on the 3GB RAM variant, so it makes sense to skip it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 20.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Save for a somewhat limited multi-window implementation in software (and let's face it, not everyone even cares about multi-window), we can hardly think of any glaring issue with the Redmi Pad. Well, the rather low-spec 64GB/3GB version is to be avoided (this one doesn't support multi-window at all, mind you), but other than that, we see no reason not to recommend the higher tiers (128GB/4GB or 128GB/6GB). It's got one of the best displays you can get for the money - it's as bright as the rest of them at this price point but has no pesky contrast shifts, and it's 90Hz amongst 60Hz competitors. Battery life is towards the top of the class, and the speakers are very good too. On the outside, the metal unibody lends it an air of premiumness. Overall, the Redmi Pad is one of the nicest all-around packages if you're looking for a midrange tablet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
Save for a somewhat limited multi-window implementation in software (and let's face it, not everyone even cares about multi-window), we can hardly think of any glaring issue with the Redmi Pad. Well, the rather low-spec 64GB/3GB version is to be avoided (this one doesn't support multi-window at all, mind you), but other than that, we see no reason not to recommend the higher tiers (128GB/4GB or 128GB/6GB). It's got one of the best displays you can get for the money - it's as bright as the rest of them at this price point but has no pesky contrast shifts, and it's 90Hz amongst 60Hz competitors. Battery life is towards the top of the class, and the speakers are very good too. On the outside, the metal unibody lends it an air of premiumness. Overall, the Redmi Pad is one of the nicest all-around packages if you're looking for a midrange tablet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
When it comes to picking a tablet, software and hardware both play a critical role. With the Redmi Pad, both work well in sync, though the performance is perhaps not all that it is hyped up to be. Where I think the Redmi Pad enjoys an advantage compared to some others I have reviewed with a similar price tag is with the battery and the display. If you are looking for a budget tablet, the Redmi Pad delivers well for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE
When it comes to picking a tablet, software and hardware both play a critical role. With the Redmi Pad, both work well in sync, though the performance is perhaps not all that it is hyped up to be. Where I think the Redmi Pad enjoys an advantage compared to some others I have reviewed with a similar price tag is with the battery and the display. If you are looking for a budget tablet, the Redmi Pad delivers well for the price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Times of India EN→DE
After spending more than a week with the Redmi Pad, I can say that the company has set the bar for budget tablets. Priced under Rs. 15000, it surprisingly offers better performance and experience than any other tablet in this range. Even compared to more expensive Android tablets, this one offers much better value, and an excellent tablet experience. Considering everything, it is indeed the best option we can recommend for less than Rs. 20000.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: The Times of India EN→DE
After spending more than a week with the Redmi Pad, I can say that the company has set the bar for budget tablets. Priced under Rs. 15000, it surprisingly offers better performance and experience than any other tablet in this range. Even compared to more expensive Android tablets, this one offers much better value, and an excellent tablet experience. Considering everything, it is indeed the best option we can recommend for less than Rs. 20000.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Xiaomi recently launched a tablet called the Xiaomi Redmi Pad, which arrived with a price tag of $240 (Rs 19,999 in India) approx. The Redmi Pad comes with a tall 10.61-inches IPS LCD display panel with a 90Hz refresh rate, and 1B colors support. The device will be available in 3GB/4GB/6GB RAM configurations with 64GB/128GB internal storage and will run on the latest Android 12 OS with the MIUI 13.1 user interface. Under the hood, you’ll find a 6nm MediaTek Helio G99 chipset with Mali-G57 MC2 GPU. In terms of the camera setup, you will receive a single 8MP rear camera, while an 8MP ultrawide selfie port is present on the front screen. The Redmi Pad is expected to be available in Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, and Mint Green color variants. For the battery section, you will get a massive Li-Po 8000mAh battery with 18W fast charging support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News EN→DE
Xiaomi recently launched a tablet called the Xiaomi Redmi Pad, which arrived with a price tag of $240 (Rs 19,999 in India) approx. The Redmi Pad comes with a tall 10.61-inches IPS LCD display panel with a 90Hz refresh rate, and 1B colors support. The device will be available in 3GB/4GB/6GB RAM configurations with 64GB/128GB internal storage and will run on the latest Android 12 OS with the MIUI 13.1 user interface. Under the hood, you’ll find a 6nm MediaTek Helio G99 chipset with Mali-G57 MC2 GPU. In terms of the camera setup, you will receive a single 8MP rear camera, while an 8MP ultrawide selfie port is present on the front screen. The Redmi Pad is expected to be available in Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, and Mint Green color variants. For the battery section, you will get a massive Li-Po 8000mAh battery with 18W fast charging support.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
This is pretty much the budget tablet everyone has been waiting for since the tablet market revived after the pandemic. Those who find an iPad way too expensive finally have a tablet that looks good, works well, and comes with a price tag that is right out of 2015! Redmi Pad review: At its starting price of Rs 12,999, the Redmi Pad is hands-down the best value-for-money tablet in the Indian market right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tech PP EN→DE
This is pretty much the budget tablet everyone has been waiting for since the tablet market revived after the pandemic. Those who find an iPad way too expensive finally have a tablet that looks good, works well, and comes with a price tag that is right out of 2015! Redmi Pad review: At its starting price of Rs 12,999, the Redmi Pad is hands-down the best value-for-money tablet in the Indian market right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Redmi Pad is undoubtedly one of the most value-for-money offerings in the budget tablet market. And, the proof is in the pudding too and the device is backed by a 90Hz 2K panel, a powerful SoC, and quad-speakers tuned by Dolby Atmos. Now, I would’ve liked to see a fingerprint sensor and a headphone jack with the device. Furthermore, the tablet doesn’t support 4G connectivity either. Putting all that aside, the starting price for the Redmi Pad is highly competitive at Rs 14,999, which makes it the tablet to beat in the market.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Redmi Pad has most features that a tablet user demands, it has a large 10.61-inch display, higher 2K+ resolution with 10-bit color depth (1B colors), 90 Hz display, quad speakers with support for Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio, as well as a fast processor from MediaTek. The Redmi Pad packs a 6nm MediaTek Helio G99 SoC with up to 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage which means it’s backed up with good hardware, delivers a decent performance, and offers a great battery life (8,000 mAh). If you are looking for a tablet in the ₹15k budget, you won’t go wrong with the Redmi Pad, it has everything you need in a tablet, the Redmi Pad is recommended buy, the price starts at ₹12,999 (3 GB RAM and 64 GB storage).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.10.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Redmi Pad competes against a bunch of Android tablets priced under Rs. 20,000. With the kind of hardware it offers, the Redmi Pad definitely looks promising on paper, however, the spec sheet only tells one part of the story. How does it perform in day-to-day life? For that, stay tuned for the full review of the Redmi Pad coming soon, on Gadgets 360.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The Redmi Pad is undoubtedly one of the most value-for-money offerings in the budget tablet market. And, the proof is in the pudding too and the device is backed by a 90Hz 2K panel, a powerful SoC, and quad-speakers tuned by Dolby Atmos. Now, I would’ve liked to see a fingerprint sensor and a headphone jack with the device. Furthermore, the tablet doesn’t support 4G connectivity either. Putting all that aside, the starting price for the Redmi Pad is highly competitive at Rs 14,999, which makes it the tablet to beat in the market.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The Redmi Pad has most features that a tablet user demands, it has a large 10.61-inch display, higher 2K+ resolution with 10-bit color depth (1B colors), 90 Hz display, quad speakers with support for Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio, as well as a fast processor from MediaTek. The Redmi Pad packs a 6nm MediaTek Helio G99 SoC with up to 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage which means it’s backed up with good hardware, delivers a decent performance, and offers a great battery life (8,000 mAh). If you are looking for a tablet in the ₹15k budget, you won’t go wrong with the Redmi Pad, it has everything you need in a tablet, the Redmi Pad is recommended buy, the price starts at ₹12,999 (3 GB RAM and 64 GB storage).
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.10.2022
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE
The Redmi Pad competes against a bunch of Android tablets priced under Rs. 20,000. With the kind of hardware it offers, the Redmi Pad definitely looks promising on paper, however, the spec sheet only tells one part of the story. How does it perform in day-to-day life? For that, stay tuned for the full review of the Redmi Pad coming soon, on Gadgets 360.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Great display; elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 31.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Great display; elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 31.12.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.04.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 26.04.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful screen; elegant design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 16.04.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful screen; elegant design; powerful processor; large battery capacity; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 16.04.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stylish design; decent processor; long battery life; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.03.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; stylish design; decent processor; long battery life; Widevine L1. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.03.2023
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great ergonomics; bright display; powerful processor; fast charging. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2023
Quelle: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→DE
Positive: Elegant design; great ergonomics; bright display; powerful processor; fast charging. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.02.2023
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; decent processor; long battery life. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.12.2022
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; decent processor; long battery life. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 29.12.2022
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.10.2022
Quelle: Ofertaman ES→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; powerful processor; long battery life. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; no headphone jack; no GPS; no stylus pen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 24.10.2022
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66%
Quelle: PC Guia PT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 12.05.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Decent performance; nice display; good speakers; modern design; great built quality. Negative: Many bloadtwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.11.2022
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Decent performance; nice display; good speakers; modern design; great built quality. Negative: Many bloadtwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.11.2022
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Impressive display; powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; premium design; metal case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Quelle: Target HD PT→DE
Positive: Impressive display; powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; premium design; metal case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2022
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: AndroidWorld.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 85% Ergonomie: 85%
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Everyeye.it IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice performance; excellent display; long battery life; great speakers; metal case; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→DE
Positive: Decent hardware; nice performance; excellent display; long battery life; great speakers; metal case; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: Diskidee.nl NL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 29.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 72%
Quelle: Want.nl NL→DE
Positive: Very long battery life; quick charging; nice display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.12.2022
Quelle: Want.nl NL→DE
Positive: Very long battery life; quick charging; nice display; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.12.2022
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Les Numeriques FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Presse Citron FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.10.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 90% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Good price; original design; large battery capacity; decent processor; nice performance. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2022
Quelle: Frandroid FR→DE
Positive: Good price; original design; large battery capacity; decent processor; nice performance. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.10.2022
Quelle: GSM Maniak PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: GSM Maniak PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.03.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.11.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.12.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.12.2022
Bewertung: Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Svet Androida CZ→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; beautiful display; high performance; nice selfie camera; very long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.10.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; beautiful display; high performance; nice selfie camera; very long battery life; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.10.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; good speakers; nice performance; large battery capacity; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.10.2022
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Beautiful display; good speakers; nice performance; large battery capacity; elegant design.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.10.2022
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 08.02.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 04.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Komputer for alle DA→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 04.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68%
Quelle: Mobil.se SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 68%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: M3 PC för alla SV→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Unlimited Tech →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Unlimited Tech →DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE jetzt bei Amazon Das neueste Mitglied der Xiaomi-Familie ist kein anderes als das Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE. Was das Design und die Verarbeitung angeht, ist dieses Modell mit seinem Aluminium-Unibody-Gehäuse sehr robust gebaut. Außerdem ist es mit Abmessungen von 255,5 x 167 x 7,4 mm und einem Gewicht von 478 g viel leichter als das Xiaomi Pad 6, das 490 g wog. Auf den ersten Blick sieht die Verarbeitungsqualität nicht schlechter aus als die des Google Pixel Tablet oder des Samsung Galaxy Tab S8. Während das Xiaomi Pad 6 Flaggschiff keinen Fingerabdrucksensor bot, ist es nicht verwunderlich, dass man auch bei diesem Budget-Modell keinen findet. Das einzige hardwarebezogene Sicherheitsmerkmal zur Entsperrung ist daher der KI-Scan des Gesichts über die Frontkamera. Abgesehen davon ist es erwähnenswert, dass die Tasten in typischer Xiaomi-Manier angeordnet sind, einschließlich der Power- und Standby-Tasten, die sich oben auf der linken Seite befinden, und der Lautstärkewippe, die sich auf der oberen linken Seite befindet. Was das Display angeht, so ist das Gerät mit einem 11-Zoll-Display ausgestattet, das ein IPS-LCD-Panel mit einer Auflösung von 1.920 x 1.200 px bei 207 ppi ist. Obwohl die maximale Bildwiederholfrequenz nur bei 90 Hz liegt, ist es definitiv ein guter Kompromiss zwischen Energieeffizienz, visueller Leichtigkeit und Benutzerfreundlichkeit. Das Display bietet eine maximale Helligkeit von 400 nits, was in der Welt der Tablets kein schlechter Wert ist, aber das Arbeiten unter direktem Sonnenlicht unmöglich macht. Trotzdem macht der Bildschirm unter typischen Bedingungen einen guten Eindruck, da er lebendige Farben, einen guten Kontrast und einen knackigen Schwarzwert bietet. Was die Leistung angeht, so ist das Redmi Pad SE mit einem Snapdragon 680 ausgestattet, der im 6-nm-Verfahren hergestellt wird, gepaart mit entweder 4, 6 oder 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM. Der interne eMMC 5.1-Speicher ist auf 128 GB begrenzt und kann nur über eine microSD-Karte um bis zu 1 TB erweitert werden. Während es insgesamt für eine flüssige Leistung sorgt, ist die Grafikleistung recht langsam. Was die Kamera betrifft, so ist dieses Modell mit insgesamt zwei Kameras ausgestattet. Auf der Vorderseite befindet sich eine 5-MP-Kamera, die an der Längsseite in den Rahmen integriert wurde, um allgemeine Videochats zu ermöglichen, und eine 8-MP-Hauptkamera, die uns optisch ein größeres Objektiv suggeriert, als es in Wirklichkeit der Fall ist. Beide bieten eine akzeptable Foto- und Videoqualität für ein Einsteigermodell. Was den Akku angeht, so ist dieser mit 8.000 mAh deutlich kleiner als der 8.840 mAh Akku des Xiaomi Pad 6, der nicht einmal lange durchhalten konnte. Im Gegensatz dazu bieten Konkurrenten wie das Google Pixel Tablet einen 7.020-mAh-Akku, der eine ganze Nummer kleiner ist. Kurz gesagt, es ist ein großartiges Tablet, das es zu entdecken gilt, je nach Bedarf und Vorliebe des Nutzers. Praktischer Artikel von Jagadisa RajarathnamAusstattung / Datenblatt
Notebook: Xiaomi Redmi Pad SEProzessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 680
Grafikkarte: Qualcomm Adreno 610
Bildschirm: 11.00 Zoll, 16:10, 1920 x 1200 Pixel
Gewicht: 0.481kg
Preis: 199.9 Euro
Links:
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Testberichte
Ein Aluminium-Unibody-Gehäuse, vier Lautsprecher mit Dolby-Atmos-Zertifizierung und ein 90-Herz-Display in einem Tablet für 200 Euro. Beim Redmi Pad SE schnürt Xiaomi ein spannendes Päckchen zum Schnäppchen-Preis. Ob das Gerät doch Schwächen hat, klärt unser Test.
Quelle: WinFuture
Xiaomi hat das Redmi Pad als kostengünstige SE-Variante neu aufgelegt. Für unter 200 Euro werden ein 11 Zoll großes Display mit 90 Hertz, viel Speicher und ein Metallgehäuse geboten.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.09.2023
Quelle: WinFuture
Xiaomi hat das Redmi Pad als kostengünstige SE-Variante neu aufgelegt. Für unter 200 Euro werden ein 11 Zoll großes Display mit 90 Hertz, viel Speicher und ein Metallgehäuse geboten.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.09.2023
Quelle: Tablet Blog
Das Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE bietet insgesamt ein gutes Preis/Leistungsverhältnis. Spannend ist es als Medien-Tablet für Netflix und YouTube.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tablet Blog
Das Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE bietet insgesamt ein gutes Preis/Leistungsverhältnis. Spannend ist es als Medien-Tablet für Netflix und YouTube.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Redmi-Tablet – im Internet unter Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE zu finden – ist auf dem Datenblatt ein absolutes Einsteiger-Tablet, was der Preis ab 199 Euro auch noch einmal unterstreicht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit Germany
Das Redmi-Tablet – im Internet unter Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE zu finden – ist auf dem Datenblatt ein absolutes Einsteiger-Tablet, was der Preis ab 199 Euro auch noch einmal unterstreicht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The Ziaomi Redmi Pad SE is definitely worth a look if you are looking for an Android tablet that is under that crucial $300 price point. It's a bit difficult to believe that at this price, you can get a solidly built tablet with an aluminum enclosure, a high refresh display, a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, up to 8GB RAM, and expandable storage, all alongside at least two OS updates. While that all looks good on paper — err, on-screen — it also works well in practice. I really enjoyed my time with this device and would have no problem recommending it to anyone who wants a midsized tablet for casual use. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE had no issues running apps side by side, streaming movies, or playing games. Sure, there's still space for improvement — I wish it had some kind of fingerprint scanner and that the speakers had a broader sound stage — but for $240, this tablet is a winner.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE
The Ziaomi Redmi Pad SE is definitely worth a look if you are looking for an Android tablet that is under that crucial $300 price point. It's a bit difficult to believe that at this price, you can get a solidly built tablet with an aluminum enclosure, a high refresh display, a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, up to 8GB RAM, and expandable storage, all alongside at least two OS updates. While that all looks good on paper — err, on-screen — it also works well in practice. I really enjoyed my time with this device and would have no problem recommending it to anyone who wants a midsized tablet for casual use. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE had no issues running apps side by side, streaming movies, or playing games. Sure, there's still space for improvement — I wish it had some kind of fingerprint scanner and that the speakers had a broader sound stage — but for $240, this tablet is a winner.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The Redmi Pad SE is currently going for just €150, a fairly good deal in our books. We liked the display, the build, the battery life and the speakers. The UI is highly customizable, albeit too heavy for the Snapdragon 680 SoC in some cases. However, consider some of the most prominent drawbacks we found. The most annoying thing is the lack of an ambient light sensor - you can't rely on the automatic brightness mode. And secondly, the charging could be faster. Sure, an argument can be made that this device will probably stay at home most of the time so it would never be far from an outlet. Still, this is one of the slowest charging tablets we've tested. If you are willing to spend just a tad more, then maybe you should consider the Xiaomi Pad 6, which has a better screen with an ambient light sensor, offers a more powerful chip and runs on the same software. Alternatively, the older Redmi Pad, the Oppo Pad Air and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ may be up your alley depending on your software preferences, but the overall experience and hardware are similar.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE
The Redmi Pad SE is currently going for just €150, a fairly good deal in our books. We liked the display, the build, the battery life and the speakers. The UI is highly customizable, albeit too heavy for the Snapdragon 680 SoC in some cases. However, consider some of the most prominent drawbacks we found. The most annoying thing is the lack of an ambient light sensor - you can't rely on the automatic brightness mode. And secondly, the charging could be faster. Sure, an argument can be made that this device will probably stay at home most of the time so it would never be far from an outlet. Still, this is one of the slowest charging tablets we've tested. If you are willing to spend just a tad more, then maybe you should consider the Xiaomi Pad 6, which has a better screen with an ambient light sensor, offers a more powerful chip and runs on the same software. Alternatively, the older Redmi Pad, the Oppo Pad Air and the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ may be up your alley depending on your software preferences, but the overall experience and hardware are similar.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
At a price of just £199 – and likely cheaper, given Xiaomi’s love of a sale – the Redmi Pad SE is one of the most affordable full-sized tablets on the market. It certainly looks and feels like a more expensive tablet, with a tidy all-metal build. Its display is big and fluid too, and together with good quad speakers, it’s a decent portable video streaming tool. Special mention, too, for the Redmi Pad SE’s stamina, which is capable of carrying you through multiple days on a single charge. However, hamstrung performance, sluggish charging, and mediocre software keep this tablet feeling its price tag whenever you try to do much beyond simple streaming. It’s useful, but in a very limited sense.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews EN→DE
At a price of just £199 – and likely cheaper, given Xiaomi’s love of a sale – the Redmi Pad SE is one of the most affordable full-sized tablets on the market. It certainly looks and feels like a more expensive tablet, with a tidy all-metal build. Its display is big and fluid too, and together with good quad speakers, it’s a decent portable video streaming tool. Special mention, too, for the Redmi Pad SE’s stamina, which is capable of carrying you through multiple days on a single charge. However, hamstrung performance, sluggish charging, and mediocre software keep this tablet feeling its price tag whenever you try to do much beyond simple streaming. It’s useful, but in a very limited sense.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
Overall, I’ve really enjoyed my experience with the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE. The powerful speakers mean that streaming sounds great, and the screen is also great to use indoors. Plus, it doesn’t run out of battery easily. Sure, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE makes compromises in some areas – all budget tablets do to keep the costs down. However, these shortcomings are all in the right areas, such as the cameras and charging speeds. If you want a tablet just for videos and day-to-day tasks and don’t want to spend a lot of money, then this is a stellar choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tech Advisor EN→DE
Overall, I’ve really enjoyed my experience with the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE. The powerful speakers mean that streaming sounds great, and the screen is also great to use indoors. Plus, it doesn’t run out of battery easily. Sure, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE makes compromises in some areas – all budget tablets do to keep the costs down. However, these shortcomings are all in the right areas, such as the cameras and charging speeds. If you want a tablet just for videos and day-to-day tasks and don’t want to spend a lot of money, then this is a stellar choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
Despite some of the compromises made to make it more affordable, the Redmi Pad SE is a decent budget tablet in the Philippines. This is made better with its use of MIUI 14 which has a better optimization for tablets.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.10.2023
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE
Despite some of the compromises made to make it more affordable, the Redmi Pad SE is a decent budget tablet in the Philippines. This is made better with its use of MIUI 14 which has a better optimization for tablets.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.10.2023
Quelle: Tech X Reviews EN→DE
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE has recently made its debut in the global market, presenting an enticing entry-level tablet option for consumers. Priced starting at $169, it offers an attractive package of an 11-inch 90Hz display, generous RAM and internal storage options, a sturdy metal build, and up-to-date software. In this full review, we will delve into the various aspects of the Redmi Pad SE to ascertain whether it lives up to Xiaomi’s claims and if it stands as a strong contender in the budget tablet arena. We will start by unboxing the device and then explore its design, display quality, hardware performance, software experience, multimedia capabilities, battery life, and overall value proposition. Additionally, we will compare it with other tablets in its price range to help you make an informed decision about whether the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE is the right tablet for your needs.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.09.2023
Quelle: Tech X Reviews EN→DE
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE has recently made its debut in the global market, presenting an enticing entry-level tablet option for consumers. Priced starting at $169, it offers an attractive package of an 11-inch 90Hz display, generous RAM and internal storage options, a sturdy metal build, and up-to-date software. In this full review, we will delve into the various aspects of the Redmi Pad SE to ascertain whether it lives up to Xiaomi’s claims and if it stands as a strong contender in the budget tablet arena. We will start by unboxing the device and then explore its design, display quality, hardware performance, software experience, multimedia capabilities, battery life, and overall value proposition. Additionally, we will compare it with other tablets in its price range to help you make an informed decision about whether the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE is the right tablet for your needs.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.09.2023
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE
From the specification point of view, this Redmi Pad SE continues the excellent workmanship of the previous generation. At a price of 1,000 yuan, it has 11 inches + stereo four speakers for audio and video. It is difficult to find a better tablet at the same price. With a relatively limited budget, we naturally cannot expect its performance to be as good as that of flagship products to meet the needs of daily use. In addition, it has a very high-quality metal body design with no breakpoints on the back. There is really no better product in its category. Good product too. We actually measured the performance of “Genshin Impact” with the default image quality + 60 FPS. It can reach the level of 33.3 FPS, and the temperature is only 40°C. With such results, the performance of games such as “QQ Speed” and “Honor of Kings” that do not require high screen load will be smoother than the hardware killer “Genshin Impact”.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.09.2023
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE
From the specification point of view, this Redmi Pad SE continues the excellent workmanship of the previous generation. At a price of 1,000 yuan, it has 11 inches + stereo four speakers for audio and video. It is difficult to find a better tablet at the same price. With a relatively limited budget, we naturally cannot expect its performance to be as good as that of flagship products to meet the needs of daily use. In addition, it has a very high-quality metal body design with no breakpoints on the back. There is really no better product in its category. Good product too. We actually measured the performance of “Genshin Impact” with the default image quality + 60 FPS. It can reach the level of 33.3 FPS, and the temperature is only 40°C. With such results, the performance of games such as “QQ Speed” and “Honor of Kings” that do not require high screen load will be smoother than the hardware killer “Genshin Impact”.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.09.2023
Quelle: Nextpit EN EN→DE
The Redmi tablet is an absolute entry-level tablet on the spec sheet, which is also underlined by the price tag. However, the Android 13 tablet turns out to be a real premium device in the hand and in daily use on the couch at home. The processor in the device is more mid-range, especially when it comes to graphics. This implies that demanding games like PUBG or Fortnite might not run optimally on the Redmi tablet. However, for all other regular activities and daily tasks, there are no limitations. The 6 nm SoC is not only compact but also quite contemporary. Nevertheless, there is no LTE feature. Neither is stylus nor keyboard support. Too bad, Xiaomi, because you almost convinced us with the audio jack and the microSD card support and got the full score. Thus, there are still deductions in the B score in the last meters, and it is only enough for 4.5 stars—but from the heart!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit EN EN→DE
The Redmi tablet is an absolute entry-level tablet on the spec sheet, which is also underlined by the price tag. However, the Android 13 tablet turns out to be a real premium device in the hand and in daily use on the couch at home. The processor in the device is more mid-range, especially when it comes to graphics. This implies that demanding games like PUBG or Fortnite might not run optimally on the Redmi tablet. However, for all other regular activities and daily tasks, there are no limitations. The 6 nm SoC is not only compact but also quite contemporary. Nevertheless, there is no LTE feature. Neither is stylus nor keyboard support. Too bad, Xiaomi, because you almost convinced us with the audio jack and the microSD card support and got the full score. Thus, there are still deductions in the B score in the last meters, and it is only enough for 4.5 stars—but from the heart!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Computerhoy ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Zona Movilidad ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Xataka ES→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 88% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Long battery life. Negative: Average performance; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2023
Quelle: Canaltech PT→DE
Positive: Long battery life. Negative: Average performance; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.09.2023
Quelle: Mister Gadget IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Mister Gadget IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.11.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Multiplayer IT IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Multiplayer IT IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Evo smart IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Evo smart IT→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 60% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 70%
Quelle: Nerd-mobile FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.12.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Nerd-mobile FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.12.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Nextpit France FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.08.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: ITHardware.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: ITHardware.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.01.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.09.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 73% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Techno Senior PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; waterproof IP68; powerful hardware; long battery life; quick charging; support 5G; good speakers. Negative: Poor display; no headphone jack; no AoD mode; no inductive charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.10.2023
Quelle: Techno Senior PL→DE
Positive: Beautiful design; waterproof IP68; powerful hardware; long battery life; quick charging; support 5G; good speakers. Negative: Poor display; no headphone jack; no AoD mode; no inductive charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.10.2023
Quelle: GSM Online PL→DE
Positive: Decent performance; great speakers; stylish design; nice display. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.09.2023
Quelle: GSM Online PL→DE
Positive: Decent performance; great speakers; stylish design; nice display. Negative: Poor cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.09.2023
Quelle: Unite4buy PL→DE
Positive: Attractive design; solid workmanship; metal case. Negative: Thick frames; weak hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.09.2023
Quelle: Unite4buy PL→DE
Positive: Attractive design; solid workmanship; metal case. Negative: Thick frames; weak hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.09.2023
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.12.2023
Bewertung: Preis: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: MobilArena HU HU→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.12.2023
Bewertung: Preis: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Compact size; nice selfie camera; decent processor; high performance; 128GB ROM; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.11.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Compact size; nice selfie camera; decent processor; high performance; 128GB ROM; large battery capacity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.11.2023
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; powerful processor; good price; premium design; decent performance.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.10.2023
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; nice display; powerful processor; good price; premium design; decent performance.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.10.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; bright display; powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Elegant design; bright display; powerful processor; high performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 11.10.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Compact size; light weight; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.10.2023
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE
Positive: Compact size; light weight; large battery capacity; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 06.10.2023
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.09.2023
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE
Positive: Big screen; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.09.2023
Kommentar
Xiaomi:
Die 2010 gegründete Xiaomi Corporation ist ein chinesisches multinationales Elektronikunternehmen und produziert Unterhaltungselektronik und verwandte Produkte, darunter Smartphones, Fernsehgeräte, Fitnessbänder, Power Banks, Kopfhörer, intelligente Geräte und Zubehör. Xiaomi bietet seine Produkte unter den Marken Mi, Redmi und POCO an.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
ARM Mali-G57 MP2: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 2 Kernen / Clustern (MC2 oder MP2) basierend auf die Valhall Architektur.
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoC. Die Performance ist vergleichbar mit dem alten Adreno 512 und daher in der unteren Mittelklasse.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Mediatek Mediatek:
Helio G99: ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC (2x Cortex-A76, 6x Cortex-A55) mit 64-Bit-Unterstützung und bis zu 2,2 GHz Taktrate für Smartphones und Tablets. Integriert ein Cat-13 4G LTE Modem. Im Unterschied zum MediaTek Helio G96, wird der G99 im moderneren 6nm Prozess gefertigt und taktet höher.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 680: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 265 Kernen (vier ARM Cortex-A73 basierte Kerne mit bis zu 2,4 GHz und 4 ARM Cortex-A53 mit bis zu 1,8 GHz) und einem X11 LTE Modem.
» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.445 kg:
Most smartphones and only a few tablets fall into this weight category. Only a few smartphones are heavier and should rather be considered tablets.
0.481 kg:
78.71%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.