, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

Der Intel Core i3-9100F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,2 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i3-9100F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i3-8100 konnte die Leistung etwas gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um 10 bis 15 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit auf kleine Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-9100F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i3-9100 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

Der Intel Core i5-9400F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit sechs Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,9-4,1 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 6 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i5-9400F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-8400 konnte die Leistung nur leicht gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um bis zu 10 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit nur auf kleinen Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt. Aber auch Spiele zählen zu den Anwendungsgebieten, denn in Spielen schlägt der Intel Core i5-9400F den Intel Core i3-9100F deutlich. Hier zahlen sich die sechs Kerne inzwischen aus. 

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i5-9400F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i5-9400 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

ModelIntel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i5-9400F
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
» Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 46 / 6
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
14 nm14 nm100
Die Size126 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2LGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
$122 U.S.$182 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
38.2 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
41.8 pt (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (54%)
416 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (5%)
2378 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (7%)
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
984 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (60%)
173 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (10%)
11.3 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (56%)
2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (58%)
6490 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (25%)
31523 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (19%)
40065 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (52%)
8182 Points (51%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
346 s (4%)
199 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (26%)
5794 Points (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (12%)
25639 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (67%)
4678 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (20%)
64 fps (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (59%)
234 fps (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (13%)
01234567891011Tooltip
9.1 fps (19%)
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (11%)
0.5 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (10%)
0.9 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (11%)
5.2 GB/s (19%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
0.7 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495 s (2%)
500 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (31%)
11185 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (44%)
70546 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (61%)
70482 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (63%)
72413 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (23%)
12616 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (23%)
5777 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (61%)
5347 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (20%)
21830 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (58%)
1132 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (56%)
1139 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (14%)
5715 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (58%)
211 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
132 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
102 Watt (27%)
123 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (7%)
8 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 127% n=41

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 06:52:41

#0 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#18 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.007s ... 0.021s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.023s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.025s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0s ... 0.025s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#23 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.006s ... 0.032s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.039s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.043s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s ... 0.068s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.08s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#112 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.101s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#114 return log +0.004s ... 0.105s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)