Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T612 vs UNISOC T618

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison T612

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T612 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T612 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

UNISOC T618

► remove from comparison T618

Der Unisoc T618 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 2 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (32, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1866 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelUNISOC T612UNISOC T618
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 « 2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz2000 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T618
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -6%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4601 -3%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -2%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -2%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -1%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4687 -1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4702 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 0%
UNISOC T618
0.475
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 1%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 9%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 12%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 15%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 174%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T618 +
22763 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T612 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
102%
T618 +
min: 2526     avg: 2954     median: 3004.5 (35%)     max: 3202 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T612 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
101%
T618 +
min: 2611     avg: 2910     median: 2961 (34%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T612 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (15%)     max: 347 Points
110%
T618 +
min: 365     avg: 380.2     median: 382 (16%)     max: 393 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T612 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
100%
T618 +
min: 1229     avg: 1332     median: 1325.5 (2%)     max: 1461 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T618 +
1911 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T618 +
5744 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T612 +
2973 ms (3%)
100%
T618 +
min: 2762     avg: 2962     median: 2874.2 (3%)     max: 3432 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T612 +
12581 Points (11%)
min: 10787     avg: 12599     median: 12356.5 (11%)     max: 14722 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
T612 +
46 Points (13%)
126%
T618 +
58 Points (17%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
T612 +
73 Points (15%)
102%
T618 +
min: 68     avg: 75.7     median: 74.5 (16%)     max: 93 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T618 +
min: 38514     avg: 46604     median: 40597 (34%)     max: 60702 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T618 +
min: 31976     avg: 38448     median: 40494 (33%)     max: 42875 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 32932     avg: 39187     median: 40289 (7%)     max: 44339 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 62476     avg: 65538     median: 66592 (24%)     max: 67546 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 173051     avg: 189777     median: 192320 (19%)     max: 203961 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
T612 +
196368 Points (12%)
109%
T618 +
min: 201310     avg: 218309     median: 213115 (13%)     max: 240502 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
T612 +
68374 Points (19%)
100%
T618 +
min: 67085     avg: 69141     median: 68306 (19%)     max: 72033 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T612 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
T612 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
min: 9058     avg: 10105     median: 10105 (16%)     max: 11152 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T612 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (35%)     max: 7776 Points
109%
T618 +
min: 7404     avg: 7980     median: 8273 (38%)     max: 8414 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T618 +
5739 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 T618 +
min: 82     avg: 3510     median: 3509.5 (23%)     max: 6937 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 T618 +
12638 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
T612 +
365 Points (14%)
102%
T618 +
min: 359     avg: 372.3     median: 372.5 (14%)     max: 385 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T612 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
100%
1 T618 +
min: 4.22     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 6.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T612 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt
100%
1 T618 +
min: 1.179     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T618 → 103% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 21:15:53

#0 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12997 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.094s ... 0.095s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.095s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.003s ... 0.098s

#7 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.017s ... 0.115s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12997 +0.015s ... 0.13s

#9 got single benchmarks 12997 +0.029s ... 0.159s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.159s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.13s ... 0.289s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.31s

#13 return log +0.024s ... 0.334s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)