Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i3-10320

Intel Core i5-10600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10600K

Der Intel Core i5-10600K ist ein sehr schneller Sechs-Kern-Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Comet-Lake-Architektur, die Ende April 2020 bereits angekündigt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 4,1-4,8 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 12 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i5-10600K weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess. Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit Z490 Chipsatz.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-9600K bietet der Core i5-10600K nun endlich auch Hyper-Threading, was sonst nur dem Topmodellen vorbehalten war. Damit steigt die Zahl der logischen Prozessoren auf 12, was im Test mit einem ordentlichen Leistungsplus bei den Multi-Thread-Aufgaben belohnt wurde. Auch die Single-Core-Performance konnte dank der höheren Taktraten gesteigert werden. Beim Core i5 wird auf den TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost) verzichtet, was im Umkehrschluss bedeutet, dass der Boost mit 4,8 GHz etwas geringer ausfällt. Bei Belastung aller Kerne sind aber immerhin noch 4,5 GHz möglich. Aufgrund der sehr hohen Single-Thread-Leistung ist der Intel Core i5-10600K für Videospiele bestens geeignet.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i5-10600K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP wurde von 95 Watt (i5-9600K) auf nun 125 Watt erhöht. Intels Turbo-Boost-Technology 2.0 erlaubt dem Prozessor unter bestimmten Bedingungen noch mehr Leistungsaufnahme. Beim Intel Core i5-10600K sind dies beim PL2 (Power-Limit) 182 Watt, welche für maximal 56 Sekunden (Tau) anliegen dürfen. Aufgrund der hohen Leistungsaufnahme sollte der Prozessor mit einem leistungsstarken Kühler betrieben werden.

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

Der Intel Core i3-10320 ist ein Einstiegs-Desktop-Prozessor der Comet Lake-S Serie und wurde im 2. Quartal 2020 vorgestellt. Er bietet vier Kerne und acht Threads mit 3,8 - 4,6 GHz Taklung. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i3-10320 weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess.

Performance

In vielen Bereichen kann der kleine i3 mit dem alten Spitzenmodell, dem Core i7-7700K mithalten. Dieser bietet zwar einen etwas geringeren Maximaltakt, aber einen etwas höheren TDP.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon zuvor bietet auch der Intel Core i5-10600K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU, welche sich aber aufgrund der geringen Leistung nicht für aufwendige Spiele eignet. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP ist mit 65 Watt (Pl1) spezifiziert und daher für Desktop-CPUs relativ gering. Für 28s kann die CPU auch 90 Watt nutzen (PL2).

ModelIntel Core i5-10600KIntel Core i3-10320
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
» Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock4100 - 4800 MHz3800 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache12 MB7.9 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA 1200
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$262 U.S.$162 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i3-10320

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10600K
49.7 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
42.8 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10475 Points (17%)
5986 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1385 Points (69%)
1185 Points (59%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
464 Points (60%)
458 Points (59%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3443 Points (15%)
2320 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1452 Points (15%)
07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
949 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
205 Points (70%)
188 Points (64%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15.8 Points (29%)
10.5 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (63%)
2.1 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7343 Points (66%)
7164 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40074 Points (55%)
28383 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
51816 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9594 Points (59%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
113.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6536 Points (38%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
40379 MIPS (29%)
25864 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5289 MIPS (76%)
4899 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.2 fps (40%)
58.8 fps (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
251.5 fps (68%)
218 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.2 fps (26%)
05101520Tooltip
8.2 fps (18%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (28%)
0.5 GB/s (18%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (29%)
0.9 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8 GB/s (30%)
5.3 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
302.4 Seconds (2%)
469 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.7 s (2%)
516 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15961 Points (55%)
10518 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68275 Points (44%)
63063 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68908 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
70668 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13014 Points (33%)
9675 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20040 Points (49%)
13564 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8290 Points (44%)
4368 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5821 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28391 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1281 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1286 Points (63%)
1217 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7248 Points (25%)
4846 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
760 ms (1%)
784 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
239 Points (63%)
224 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
204.4 Watt (35%)
115 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
172.5 Watt (46%)
96.3 Watt (25%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.4 Points per Watt (10%)
9.9 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10600K → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 80% n=31

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 02:26:48

#0 checking url part for id 12212 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 12212 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#21 got single benchmarks 12212 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.023s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.025s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0s ... 0.025s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#27 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.032s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.038s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.042s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.01s ... 0.06s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.07s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.095s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.1s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#111 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.101s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.126s

#113 return log +0.004s ... 0.13s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)