, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i9-10850K vs Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

Der Intel Core i9-10850K ist eine High-End-CPU mit zehn Kernen auf Basis der neuen Comet-Lake-Architektur, die Ende April 2020 bereits angekündigt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-5,2 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 20 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i9-10850K weiterhin im 14-nm-Prozess. Dank des freien Multiplikators lässt sich der Prozessor vergleichsweise einfach übertakten. Voraussetzung hierfür ist jedoch ein Mainboard mit Z490 Chipsatz.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-10900K ist der Intel Core i9-10850K nur minimal langsamer als ein Intel Core i9-10900K. Gleichwohl bietet der i9-10850K ebenfalls 10 Kerne und 20 Threads, was den Prozessor für intensive Workloads sehr attraktiv macht. Die schlechte Verfügbarkeit des Core i9-10900K war wohl einer der Hauptgründe, den Core i9-10850K ins Leben zu rufen. Neben der guten Systemleistung fühlt sich der Core i9-10850K auch beim Spielen pudelwohl.

Grafikeinheit

Wie schon das Top-Modell bietet auch der Intel Core i9-10850K mit der Intel UHD Graphics 630 eine iGPU. Aufgrund der geringen Leistung eignet sich diese allerdings nur für den 2D-Betrieb. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Bei der Leistungsaufnahme sind sich die beiden Core i9-Modelle sehr ähnlich, was auch kein Wunder ist, denn rein technisch sind diese beiden Prozessoren identisch aufgebaut. Somit hat auch der Intel Core i9-10850K eine TDP von 125 Watt (PL1). Doch richtig energiehungrig wird der Prozessor erst, wenn der Boost zum Tragen kommt. Hier können es dann auch schon mal bis zu 250 Watt sein, wenn die Rahmenbedingungen stimmen.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

Der Intel Core i5-10400F ist ein schneller Sechs-Kern-Prozessor auf Basis der neuen Comet-Lake-Architektur, die Ende April 2020 angekündigt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit einem Basistakt von 2,9 GHz und erreicht unter Last einen All-Core-Boost von 4,0 GHz. Bei Single-Thread-Anwendungen erricht der Intel Core i5-10400F sogar bis zu 4,3 GHz. Auch dieses Modell kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 12 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i5-10400F wie bekannt, im 14-nm-Prozess. Da es sich hierbei um eine non-K-CPU handelt ist der Multiplikators geblockt, sodass hier nicht viel Spielraum beim Übertakten zu erwarten ist.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-9400F bietet der Core i5-10400F nun endlich Hyper-Threading, was sonst nur den Topmodellen vorbehalten war. Damit steigt die Zahl der logischen Prozessoren auf 12, was im Test mit einem ordentlichen Leistungsplus bei den Multi-Thread-Aufgaben belohnt wird. Die verbesserte IPC sorgt unterm Strich ebenfalls für eine bessere Single-Core-Performance. Beim Core i5 wird auf den TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost) verzichtet. Bei Belastung aller Kerne sind aber immerhin noch 4,0 GHz möglich. Aufgrund der sehr hohen Single-Thread-Leistung ist der Intel Core i5-10400F für Videospiele bestens geeignet.

Grafikeinheit

Die in der Nomenklatur mit "F" gekennzeichneten Prozessoren bieten keine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Alle anderen non-F-Prozessoren können auf die Intel UHD Graphics 630 zurückgreifen und ermöglichen auch einen Betrieb ohne eine dedizierte Grafikkarte.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP fällt mit 65 Watt relativ gering aus. Dies ist der PL1-Wert. Für den Turbo bietet der Intel Core i5-10400F mit dem PL2 eine höhere TDP von bis zu 134 Watt. Diese dürfen aber nur maximal 28 Sekunden anliegen (Tau). Ein guter Luftkühler sollte mit der entstehenden Abwärme zurechtkommen, sodass bei diesem Prozessor keine AiO notwendig ist.

ModelIntel Core i9-10850KIntel Core i5-10400F
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
» Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock3600 - 5200 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 206 / 12
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
Socket1200LGA 1200
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$453 U.S.$155 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
61.1 pt (72%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
46.6 pt (55%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
15538 Points (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
1314 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
511 Points (67%)
438 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5961 Points (25%)
3201 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2457 Points (25%)
0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
1332 Points (14%)
07014021028035042049056063070077084091098010501120119012601330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (75%)
180 Points (63%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.1 Points (52%)
14.4 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.5 Points (70%)
2 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6829 Points (61%)
6719 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58453 Points (80%)
36564 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76123 Points (68%)
47901 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6828 Points (42%)
8849 Points (55%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
68.1 s (1%)
135 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9424 Points (60%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
70932 MIPS (50%)
36731 MIPS (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5914 MIPS (85%)
5064 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
147 fps (67%)
81.2 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
286 fps (78%)
229 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20.3 fps (44%)
051015202530Tooltip
11.2 fps (24%)
012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (52%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (52%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (54%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
181 Seconds (1%)
332 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
0.6 sec (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.9 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420 s (2%)
470 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
22639 Points (80%)
14539 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72388 Points (47%)
62086 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72353 Points (64%)
61795 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
73572 Points (67%)
62883 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19764 Points (50%)
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28058 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14278 Points (77%)
7548 Points (41%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6425 Points (74%)
5587 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44146 Points (54%)
25403 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1412 Points (72%)
1217 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11426 Points (36%)
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1401 Points (69%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (60%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11436 Points (40%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (22%)     max: 6372 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
717 ms (1%)
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
253 Points (72%)
215 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
302 Watt (52%)
136 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
259 Watt (69%)
126 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.5 Points per Watt (11%)
10.6 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 79% n=36

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 21:35:10

#0 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#17 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.011s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#21 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.024s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.026s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0s ... 0.027s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#26 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.006s ... 0.033s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.04s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.045s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.066s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.077s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.078s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.08s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.085s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.092s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.095s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#115 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.098s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#117 return log +0.004s ... 0.102s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)