, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i9-9900T vs Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

Der Intel Core i9-9900T ist eine High-End-CPU mit acht Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 vorgestellt wurde. Im Vergleich zum deutlich schneller getakteten Core i9-9900K, ist der 9900T mit einem deutlich niedrigeren TDP spezifiziert. Der Prozessor taktet mit 2,1 - 4,4 GHz und kann dank Hyperthreading bis zu 16 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i9-9900T im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Durch die acht CPU-Kerne bietet die CPU trotz der geringeren Taktung eine ordentliche Multi-Threaded-Leistung. Die Single-Core Leistung ist aufgrund des relativ hohen Turbo von bis zu 4,4 GHz relativ schnell. Wie immer ist die Leistung aber stark von der Kühlung abhängig. Im Idealfall hällt der 9900T mit den schnellen 6-Kernern der Vorgängergeneration mit.

Grafikeinheit

Die nun als Intel UHD Graphics 630 bezeichnete iGPU taktet mit 1.200 MHz genauso schnell wie zuvor. somit ist kein nennenswerter Performancevorteil zu erwarten. Als Low-End-Lösung können aktuelle Videospiele, wenn überhaupt, lediglich in verminderter Detailstufe flüssig wiedergegeben werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power auf 35 Watt und damit deutlich unter den 95 Watt des 9900K. Dadurch kann man deutlich kleinere und schwächere Kühllösungen nutzen.

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

Der Intel Core i3-9100F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,2 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i3-9100F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i3-8100 konnte die Leistung etwas gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um 10 bis 15 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit auf kleine Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-9100F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i3-9100 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

ModelIntel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i3-9100F
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
» Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 812 MB
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 69 MB
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 69 MB
» Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 46 MB
Clock2100 - 4400 MHz3600 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 4
TDP35 Watt65 Watt
Technology14++ nm14 nm
Die Size178 mm2126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$439 U.S.$122 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Coffee Lake i9-9900T

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
40.3 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
38.2 pt (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
440 Points (57%)
414 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2626 Points (11%)
1175 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1112 Points (11%)
06012018024030036042048054060066072078084090096010201080Tooltip
634 Points (7%)
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
185 Points (65%)
171 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.4 Points (23%)
5.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (60%)
2 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6758 Points (60%)
6509 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31357 Points (43%)
18118 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (52%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
162 s (2%)
346 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.9 s (1%)
11.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6109 Points (39%)
4052 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
35084 MIPS (25%)
17150 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4894 MIPS (70%)
4682 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
70.3 fps (32%)
44.4 fps (20%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
173 fps (47%)
218 fps (59%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
5.5 fps (12%)
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
6.1 fps (13%)
01234567891011Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (19%)
0.3 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (17%)
0.5 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (17%)
3 GB/s (11%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
422 Seconds (3%)
687 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.9 sec (41%)
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10259 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.6 s (1%)
21 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
481 s (2%)
495 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4080 Points (14%)
8742 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
12668 Points (8%)
68492 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12727 Points (11%)
68473 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13200 Points (12%)
68727 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3268 Points (8%)
6295 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13365 Points (34%)
8958 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5870 Points (32%)
4218 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5381 Points (62%)
5301 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
23223 Points (29%)
15937 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1193 Points (61%)
1146 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5875 Points (19%)
4060 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1206 Points (59%)
1152 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5888 Points (20%)
4074 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
878 ms (1%)
866 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
197 Points (56%)
204 Points (58%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.2 Watt (11%)
139 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57 Watt (15%)
102 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.5 Points per Watt (22%)
6.3 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 125% n=39

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 20:36:51

#0 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#19 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.026s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.028s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0s ... 0.028s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#31 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.006s ... 0.035s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.036s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.042s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.047s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.068s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.078s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.08s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.085s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.087s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.088s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.093s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.095s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.097s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.098s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.099s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.1s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#119 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.102s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#121 return log +0.004s ... 0.106s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)