Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Ausstattung / Datenblatt
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, Videos @1080p/30fps
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 20 Bewertungen (aus 60 Tests)
Testberichte für das Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Oppo will die Mittelklasse aufmischen und mit dem Reno3 Pro 5G ein Smartphone mit hoch auflösender Quad-Cam bieten, das auch mit gutem Bildschirm und ordentlicher Akkulaufzeit überzeugen soll. Ob das klappt, das klären wir im Test.
Quelle: Android Pit Archive.org version
Features wie Dual-Sim, Mehrfachnutzung und der zusätzliche Slot für die microSD-Speicherkarte machen das Oppo Reno 3 Pro zu einem sehr guten Firmen- und Alltagshandy. Begeistern konnte mich während meines Testes vor allem der Fingerabdrucksensor, der direkt mittig im Display integriert ist und so herrlich einfach – auch unterwegs – bedient werden kann.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Yugatech Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.09.2020
Quelle: Pokde EN→DE Archive.org version
Coming with a price tag of RM2,099, it’s hard to justify the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Don’t get me wrong, the device itself didn’t gave me a bad experience but with that price tag, there are a number of smartphones out there you can consider. If it was priced lower, I would easily recommend this to people.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Preis: 59% Leistung: 74% Mobilität: 77% Gehäuse: 78%
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
It's great that the Reno3 Pro 5G has that flagship feel, it offers 5G connectivity, and the overall camera performance is more than just good but it's just not enough to make it stand out. There has to be a dramatic price correction for the phone to stay relevant in this cut-throat upper mid-range market where even last year's flagships are well within reach.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78%
Quelle: Yugatech EN→DE Archive.org version
The Reno 3 Pro is an exceptional device that not only has great cameras, but also holds a respectable battery life, an intuitive user interface, and massive internal storage making it superb for day to day use. Although it does not boast any exceptional design construction, this device still packs a punch when it comes to performance and quality, making it the right candidate if you’re looking for something a little long-term.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.05.2020
Quelle: Hitech Century EN→DE Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno3 Pro is a bit on the pricey side but comes with a good Super AMOLED display, impressively fast 30W Vooc 4.0 Flash Charge fast charging, lots of storage and a decent camera array. .
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE Archive.org version
Oppo Reno 3 Pro is a mixed bag of the good and the bad. As we said before, the looks are good but do not stand out. A tall display and a good battery life are two key features that we loved about the device. The phone clicks selfies that are worthy of sharing on social media. The secondary lens on the front is the icing on the top. What may be a miss is the absence of a faster processor. This may affect the numbers on tables considering what the rivals offer in the same price segment.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.05.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Manila Shaker EN→DE Archive.org version
Oppo Reno 3 Pro is versatile, especially with its camera flexibility, mobile filmmakers will love it. A mid-range device that offers lots of features, it feels like a flagship phone. A 4000mAh battery with flash charge is an advantage together with a super AMOLED screen. This device will satisfy you in every way. Oppo Reno 3 Series will give you a premium feel and definitely worth the bucks. Reno 3 Pro is now up for pre-order in the Philippines for P28,990 while the vanilla version has an official price tag of P18,990. You can watch our full review video of Oppo Reno 3 Pro here.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.05.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
Usually, when we review a pro and non-pro variant of a new phone line, we almost always recommend getting the Pro variant because of the added features and better value for money. That isn’t the case for the Reno3 Pro.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.04.2020
Quelle: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
If Find X2 Pro is the Underrated Flagship, this Oppo Reno 3 Pro is our underrated Flagship Killer, and here's why. Oppo Reno 3 Pro is now official in the Philippines the price of P28,990. We reviewed some camera samples of the world's first phone with a 44MP dual selfie shooter then we tested some games: Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, and PUBG, in summary, this phone can really compete with other flagships.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2020
Quelle: Android Police EN→DE Archive.org version
The OnePlus 8 Pro merges great hardware with some of the best software you can get. As always, there are nits to pick when it comes to the camera (and, if you're really picky, the screen), but even on a more pessimistic device comparison, there's not a lot that's bad about the 8 Pro. Making a list of the things wrong with something rather than what's right is actually one of my favorite ways to compare devices, precisely because when things are good, you don't notice, it's just the things that bother you that stick in your mind, and the 8 Pro has very little working against it. And that's why we're giving it our Most Wanted accolade.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
To sum up my experience and the eventual reflection on the OPPO Reno 3 Pro – it’s an underrated conundrum. Offline buyers will feel it is underrated when they see all the negative feedback about the price and it is a conundrum for us tech enthusiasts because it is hard not to recommend to the enthusiastic buyer who doesn’t care about specifications or GPU performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.04.2020
Quelle: Team Android EN→DE Archive.org version
For our review, we will be listing some of the key components of Opppo Reno 3’s camera. These components can be software or hardware but, in our opinion, these are the major aspects which make up the whole Reno 3 camera experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.04.2020
Quelle: Pocketnow Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 3 Pro just might be a turning point for the once experimental line -- there's no pop up, no telescopic lens, but there's still plenty to love about this third generation Reno device.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2020
Quelle: Techradar EN→DE Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 3 Pro has stylish looks, a comfy form factor and competent cameras in an otherwise uninspired package. Performance is fair to middling and battery life is just okay. Factor in better priced rival smartphones, and the Reno 3 Pro becomes a hard phone to recommend.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Team Android EN→DE Archive.org version
Oppo has launched Reno 3 Pro in various regions, having had the unit with us for over a week a now, here is our complete review. Reno name kicked off last year when Oppo unveiled its shark-fin pop-up camera technology. Extending the series, Reno 3 series is what Oppo has developed for 2020. Featuring promising internals, a competitive price-point, read our complete Reno 3 Pro review ahead to find out whether this phone is the perfect buy for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.04.2020
Quelle: Neowin EN→DE Archive.org version
If the average camera performance the slow charging speeds are a deal-breaker for you, Xiaomi has a solution -- the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max. This is essentially the same device as the Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it comes with an improved primary 64MP camera that offers better low-light performance, a higher resolution selfie camera, and 33W fast charging support. Considering there is a very minor price difference between the two (Rs 2000/$28), buying the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max makes more sense than the Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: TechTablets Archive.org version
Oppo Reno 3 Pro 5G unboxing and full in-depth review. The SD765 6.5" 90Hz AMOLED phone with 48MP camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 26.03.2020
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
In comparison, the Oppo Reno 3 Pro does not offer the same kind of performance. Its relatively weak processor is evident in our benchmarks. However, it isn't terrible for everyday use, and if you aren't a power user, you won't really notice the difference. Camera performance is decent for the price, but this phone could do with a few tweaks to improve video quality in low light. You can consider the Reno 3 Pro for its camera capabilities, but if you are looking for the maximum value for your money, the Realme X2 Pro should be your pick.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
The first phone with a 44MP Dual Front Camera is coming to the Philippines. But due to coronavirus concern, phone availability will be delayed. For now, just watch our first impression to this midrange versatile Phone from Oppo.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.03.2020
Quelle: Unbox EN→DE Archive.org version
We don’t have prices for either device as of yet, as availability and the official launch will come in a few day’s time. But to give you an idea of how much the Reno3 Pro will be, it’s currently listed at Rs 29,990 in India, which works out to around 20.7K Php in our currency. Whether that would be the final price of the phone when it lands here is unclear.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2020
Quelle: Business Standard EN→DE Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 3 Pro is priced at Rs 29,990 for the 8GB + 128GB variant, and Rs 32,990 for the 8GB + 256GB storage variant. The phone impresses with its battery life, sleek design, and a decent performance. These make it an ideal smartphone for everyday use. However, its MediaTek Helio P95 processor doesn't live up to expectations when it comes to offering a smooth gaming experience.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.03.2020
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
Firstly, you should be an Oppo loyalist to be willing to spend Rs 30,000 on the Reno 3 Pro. Secondly, you get a great display and good cameras on the Reno 3 Pro. Thirdly, the battery on the Reno 3 Pro is worth appreciating. Fourthly, the design on the Oppo Reno 3 Pro is eye-catching and people around you will stare at it if they cannot be straightforward enough to ask you what phone this is. If these four points sound well to you, Reno 3 Pro is the one for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has impressed with its camera features, the display quality, and the super-fast VOOC charging. You may find Snapdragon 855 powered smartphones in this segment which might be great for performance enthusiasts. Unless you demand better performance, the OPPO Reno3 Pro can be a great multimedia device and a great daily driver altogether.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.03.2020
Quelle: Techniqued EN→DE Archive.org version
So summing up, the Reno 3 Pro camera performance is definitely good in almost all areas except the ultra wide angle camera where the clarity was not great, both in photos and videos, but it can be fixed with software update. Oppo, with Reno 3 Pro, once again proves that they are the selfie expert with 44MP shooter which gives impressive selfies. All in all, the Reno 3 Pro has a good quad camera set up which wont disappoint you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.03.2020
Quelle: GSM Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno3 Pro has all bases covered as great phones should. It's got a class-leading vibrant and bright OLED; a generous 4,025 mAh battery, which provides great battery life; the 3.5mm audio jack is still here; and the overall camera experience is impressive even on the pre-production software. This cameras on the Reno3 Pro punch above its class.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.03.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76%
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
Oppo Reno 3 Pro bets big on its camera capabilities and in our initial rendezvous it didn't disappoint us. Even the UI - Color OS 7 look polished. We will talk more about the smartphone in our review where we will talk about all the aspects that would matter to a consumer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 02.03.2020
Quelle: Igeekphone EN→DE Archive.org version
For OPPO, the landmark product of OPPO Reno3 Pro represents the first dual-mode 5G phone of OPPO to join the 5G battle in 2020. As a product with a starting price of 3999 yuan, OPPO Reno 3 Pro is generally worth the money. It is the best choice for year-end purchases and the strongest flagship of the Snapdragon 765G platform currently available.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.12.2019
Quelle: AndroidPit.fr FR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 01.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tabletowo PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.08.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Android.com.pl PL→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.07.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Antyweb PL→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; nice design; great cameras; high performance; good price. Negative: Marked case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 13.08.2020
Quelle: Inceleme.co TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 88%
Quelle: Chip Online TR TR→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail RU→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Hitech Vesti RU→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; elegant design; solid workmanship; good price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.04.2020
Quelle: Techtimes.vn VN→DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 13.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; great performance; decent cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.07.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful display; nice selfie camera; quick charging; excellent main camera. Negative: Plastic case; only 60Hz display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.06.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great cameras; high performance; fast charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.05.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Decent processor; nice gaming performance; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.05.2020
Quelle: VNReview VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive selfie camera; beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Weak hardware; average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; decent hardware; high performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 10.05.2020
Quelle: Cell Phones VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive selfie dual camera; excellent main camera; nice performance; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.05.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent selfie camera; nice quad main camera; stylish design; high performance; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.05.2020
Quelle: Genk VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent selfie camera; good price; decent hardware; long battery life; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.05.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; quick charging; decent performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; great selfie camera; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2020
Quelle: Genk VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Slim size; great built quality; light weight; nice quad cameras; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Great selfie dual camera; quick charging; good price; nice display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.05.2020
Quelle: Zing VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; impressive selfie camera; decent hardware; nice performance; quick charging.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.05.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Nice AI cameras; high gaming performance; great connectivity.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 30.03.2020
Quelle: The Gioididong VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging; attractive price. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.03.2020
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; decent hardware; nice performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 09.01.2020
Quelle: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; nice cameras; decent hardware; quick charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.01.2020
Quelle: Danviet VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; support 5G; elegant design; great built quality.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 28.12.2019
Quelle: FPT shop VN→DE Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive display; powerful processor; nice quad cameras; decent autonomy; fast charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.12.2019
Quelle: Unlimited Tech →DE Archive.org version
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.06.2020
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Arena IT →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Support 5G; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.06.2020
Quelle: Computerblog.ro →DE Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; decent hardware; nice performance; good autonomy; great cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.06.2020
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 620: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 765/765G SoC. Etwas schnellere Version der Adreno 618 (+20% laut Qualcomm für den 765G). Im 765G nochmals 10% schneller als im Snapdragon 765 (durch höhere Taktraten).
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 765G: Mittelklasse SoC mit 8 Kryo 475 Kernen (1x ARM Cortex A76 2,4 GHz Prime Core, 1x ARM Cortex A76 2,2 GHz Gold Core und 6x ARM Cortex-A55 1,8 GHz) und einem X52 5G Modem (bis zu 3,7 / 1,6 Mbps Down- und Upload, mmWave und Sub-6 Support). Im Vergleich zur Non-G Version ist der Prime-Core um 100 MHz höher getaktet und auch die GPU bietet einen nicht definierten höheren Takt (+20% mehr Leistung). Der Snapdragon 765 und 765G werden bei Samsung im modernen 7nm EUV Prozess gefertigt.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .
6.50": Es handelt sich um ein kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte nicht stark fehlsichtig sein und man wird wenig Details am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät klein und handlich sein, gut transportierbar.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.
0.171 kg:
In diese Gewichtsklasse fallen die meisten Smartphones und nur vereinzelt Tablets. Nur wenige Smartphones sind schwerer und eher als Tablets anzusehen.
Oppo:
OPPO Electronics Corp. ist ein 2004 gegründeter chinesischer Elektronikhersteller, der hauptsächlich Smartphones, Blu-ray-Player, Audiogeräte, Power Banks und andere elektronische Produkte produziert. Es ist ein Tochterunternehmen von BBK Electronic Corporation, einem riesigen chinesischen Elektronikkonzern, zu dem auch Oppo,Vivo und Realme gehören. Der gemeinsame Weltmarkt-Anteil bei Smartphones ist dadurch sehr hoch.
78.66%: Weltbewegend ist diese Bewertung nicht. Diese Bewertung muss man eigentlich als unterdurchschnittlich ansehen, denn es gibt etwa ebenso mehr Geräte mit schlechtere Beurteilungen als Besseren. Eine Kaufempfehlung kann man nur mit viel Wohlwollen darin sehen, es sei denn es handelt sich um Websites, die generell streng urteilen.
» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.