Intel Core i9-12900HX vs Intel Core i5-10500H
Intel Core i9-12900HX ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HX ist eine High-End-Notebook-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-S Desktop-Chip und bietet alle 8 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 24 Threads) und takten von 2,3 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,7 - 3,6 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die CPU bietet einen freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12950HX, bietet der 12900HX kein vPro oder ECC Support.
Performance
Durch die zwei zusätzlichen P-Kerne und den höheren TDP sollte der i9-12900HX deutlich schneller sein als der i9-12900HK . Dadurch eignet sich die CPU hervorragend für anspruchsvolle Anwendungen und Spiele.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HX sind alle 32 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,55 GHz. Der schwächere 12900HK Mobilchip bietet 96 EUs.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800 und DDR4-3200. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt 48 PCIe Lanes, davon 16 PCIe 5.0 (x16 oder 2 x8).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HX ist mit 55 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 157 Watt). Gefertigt wird der 12900HX im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Intel Core i5-10500H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-10500H ist ein Hexa-Core-SoC für Notebooks, der auf der Comet-Lake-Architektur (4. Generation der Skylake Architektur) basiert. Er taktet die sechs Prozessorkerne mit 2,5 - 4,5 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und kann wahrscheinlich vom Notebookhersteller auf 35 Watt heruntergesetzt werden (configurable TDP = cTDP Down).
Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Comet Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und auch die Fertigung ist im Vergleich zu Coffee Lake die selbe (14nm++). Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt nun DDR4-2933.
Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der i5-10500H am besten für große und schwere Notebooks, per "configurable TDP-down" kann die CPU auch mit 35 Watt betrieben werden, bei geringerer Leistung (Turbo wird nicht so lange gehalten).
Model Intel Core i9-12900HX Intel Core i5-10500H Series Intel Alder Lake-S Intel Comet Lake Codename Alder Lake-HX Comet Lake-H Serie: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H Clock 1700 - 5000 MHz 2500 - 4500 MHz L1 Cache 1.4 MB 384 KB L2 Cache 14 MB L3 Cache 30 MB 12 MB Cores / Threads 16 / 24 6 / 12 TDP 55 Watt 45 Watt Technology 10 nm 14 nm max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket BGA1964 BGA1440 Features DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HX
48.3 pt (67%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10500H
32.9 pt (46%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 18337 avg: 22529 median: 23150 (21%) max: 23482 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 78% 100% 98% 98% 96%
min: 6820 avg: 7104 median: 7103.5 (7%) max: 7387 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 29% 31% 78% 100% 98% 98% 96%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1897 avg: 1917 median: 1912.5 (81%) max: 1936 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100%
min: 1158 avg: 1160 median: 1159.5 (49%) max: 1161 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 60% 60% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 728 avg: 738 median: 739 (82%) max: 745 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 99% 100% 100% 99% 100%
min: 446 avg: 448 median: 448 (50%) max: 450 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 60% 60% 99% 100% 100% 99% 100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 7037 avg: 8602 median: 8842.5 (22%) max: 9042 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 78% 100% 98% 96% 94%
min: 2842 avg: 2919 median: 2919 (7%) max: 2996 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 33% 31% 78% 100% 98% 96% 94%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2830 avg: 3493 median: 3566 (23%) max: 3652 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 77% 100% 98% 98% 96%
min: 1209 avg: 1249 median: 1249 (8%) max: 1289 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 35% 33% 77% 100% 98% 98% 96%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 274 avg: 278 median: 278 (84%) max: 282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 98% 100% 99% 99% 99%
min: 184.5 avg: 186.3 median: 186.3 (56%) max: 188 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 67% 65% 98% 100% 99% 99% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.5 Points (54%)
13.8 Points (18%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 33% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (83%)
2.1 Points (52%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 63% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9509 Points (57%)
7109 Points (43%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 75% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
64621 Points (47%)
37125 Points (27%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 57% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
245.7 s (3%)
281 s (3%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.8 s (2%)
9.1 s (2%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
9993 Points (16%)
6194 Points (10%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 62% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 69778 avg: 84614 median: 86541 (50%) max: 88128 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 79% 100% 99% 98% 98%
min: 33075 avg: 33445 median: 33445 (19%) max: 33815 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 38% 39% 79% 100% 99% 98% 98%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6165 avg: 6293 median: 6336 (76%) max: 6358 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100%
min: 4874 avg: 4886 median: 4885.5 (58%) max: 4897 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 77% 77% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
185.5 fps (65%)
77.8 fps (27%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 42% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
313.7 fps (72%)
227.5 fps (52%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 73% 100%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.6 avg: 25 median: 26 (46%) max: 26.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 75% 99% 99% 97% 97%
min: 9.31 avg: 9.5 median: 9.5 (17%) max: 9.73 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 35% 37% 75% 99% 99% 97% 97%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 34% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.2 GB/s (55%)
0.9 GB/s (16%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 29% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.4 GB/s (45%)
4.1 GB/s (11%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 24% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 261 avg: 277.5 median: 267 (3%) max: 358 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 144 avg: 154.4 median: 148.6 (1%) max: 201 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 382 avg: 385.5 median: 385.5 (3%) max: 389 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 102% 100% 100% 101% 102% 102% 102% 102%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4159 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4242 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 0.634 avg: 0.6 median: 0.6 (14%) max: 0.645 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 106% 100% 100% 106% 106% 106% 106% 106%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17459 avg: 17668 median: 17668 (38%) max: 17877 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 100% 98%
11157 Points (24%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 62% 98%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
8.6 s (2%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
19.1 s (1%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
379.6 s (2%)
485.6 s (2%)
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
88577 Points (78%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20782 avg: 23514 median: 22972 (62%) max: 26386 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 88% 87% 86% 90% 87% 100%
min: 11219 avg: 12299 median: 12299 (33%) max: 13379 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 88% 51% 43% 87% 86% 90% 87% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 100525 avg: 101928 median: 101928 (83%) max: 103331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W 97% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 100362 avg: 101890 median: 101890 (83%) max: 103418 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W 97% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 96923 avg: 99059 median: 99450 (84%) max: 100413 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W 97% 100% 98% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18927 avg: 20662 median: 19881 (50%) max: 23351 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W 94% 81% 83% 100% 85%
min: 10881 avg: 11086 median: 11085.5 (28%) max: 11290 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W 94% 48% 47% 81% 83% 100% 85%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29204 avg: 32485 median: 32071 (57%) max: 36791 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 90% 81% 81% 90% 84% 100%
min: 16551 avg: 17052 median: 17051.5 (30%) max: 17552 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 90% 48% 45% 81% 81% 90% 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12600 avg: 14855 median: 14895 (63%) max: 17144 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 85% 79% 99% 88% 100%
min: 6016 avg: 6390 median: 6389.5 (27%) max: 6763 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 43% 38% 85% 79% 99% 88% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1874 avg: 1909 median: 1906.5 (80%) max: 1949 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 98% 98% 98% 100% 99% 96%
min: 1181 avg: 1202 median: 1205.5 (51%) max: 1214 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 88% 62% 61% 98% 98% 100% 99% 96%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15116 avg: 16247 median: 16311.5 (29%) max: 16925 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 92% 99% 100% 99% 100%
min: 5550 avg: 6139 median: 6332 (11%) max: 6340 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 85% 38% 34% 92% 99% 100% 99% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1821 avg: 1848 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1875 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 97% 100%
1200 Points (5%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 97% 64% 100%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16305 avg: 16488 median: 16487.5 (52%) max: 16670 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 100% 98%
6233 Points (20%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 37% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8112 avg: 8182 median: 8182 (82%) max: 8252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 98% 100%
5501 Points (55%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 98% 67% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 58195 avg: 58846 median: 58845.5 (65%) max: 59496 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 100% 98%
25696 Points (28%)
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 110 W 100% 43% 98%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 488 avg: 492.5 median: 492 (1%) max: 498 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 813 avg: 819 median: 818.5 (1%) max: 824 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
77.4 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 94901 avg: 95303 median: 95387 (86%) max: 95620 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 136 W 99% 100% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 268 avg: 279 median: 275 (79%) max: 290 Points
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 95% 92% 94% 100%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 293 avg: 317.2 median: 317.5 (66%) max: 341 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 90% 96% 94% 93% 86% 100%
min: 218 avg: 223.5 median: 223.5 (47%) max: 229 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 90% 67% 64% 96% 94% 93% 86% 100%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2108 avg: 2147 median: 2150.5 (82%) max: 2170 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 99% 99% 100% 100% 97% 98%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 139.4 avg: 168.5 median: 161.6 (28%) max: 204 Watt
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 117% 112% 111% 107% 100%
min: 93.3 avg: 99.2 median: 99.2 (17%) max: 105 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 126% 129% 117% 112% 111% 107% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 113.7 avg: 187.6 median: 207 (38%) max: 225 Watt
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 115% 134% 106% 103% 100%
min: 105.9 avg: 115.5 median: 115.5 (21%) max: 125 Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 131% 137% 115% 134% 106% 103% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
25.6 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
17.7 Watt (20%)
7.8 Watt (9%)
CPU TDP 71 W TDP 100 W 114% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.6 avg: 19.5 median: 16.6 (12%) max: 32.1 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 50% 100% 54% 52% 49%
min: 10.3 avg: 10.9 median: 10.9 (8%) max: 11.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 71 W TDP 86 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 125 W TDP 136 W 32% 36% 50% 100% 54% 52% 49%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HX → 100% n=39 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10500H → 61% n=39
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.27
log 16. 06:56:23
#0 checking url part for id 14401 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 13217 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14401 +0.023s ... 0.048s
#7 got single benchmarks 14401 +0.032s ... 0.079s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13217 +0.02s ... 0.099s
#9 got single benchmarks 13217 +0.016s ... 0.115s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.466s ... 0.582s
#12 return log +0.068s ... 0.65s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)